Cazenove Multi-Manager Diversity

To print fund fact sheets, please use the print option in the Factsheet Tools section in the top right corner:

http://citywire.co.uk/fund/factsheet/c12436

Factsheet Tools

reset

No results found


Glossary

  • Fund

    A way for individual investors to pool their money together, allowing them to invest in assets that would otherwise be unobtainable

  • Fund manager

    The person who decides where the fund's money should be invested. As such, finding a talented manager (such as those with a Citywire rating) is of paramount importance

  • Sector

    Funds are grouped together into sectors, allowing fund managers to be judged against their benchmarks and peer group. Each sector has rules about what assets funds are allowed to invest in

  • Assets

    A generic term meaning 'what you own'. If you can buy it, it's an asset. In the world of investments the most common assets are shares, bonds, property and cash.

  • Asset class

    A group of assets with similar properties. For example, while shares will rise or fall in price individually, economic factors can affect all shares similarly. The same economic factors might affect bonds very differently – so shares and bonds are separate asset classes.

  • Asset allocation

    The process of deciding which asset classes to invest in. Successful asset allocation is often more important than selecting individual assets (for example deciding whether to invest mainly in shares, rather than which shares to invest in). Since most fund managers are tied to their sector rules, you need to either do your own asset allocation or buy a managed fund.

  • Benchmark

    A measure of how different areas of the markets are performing, against which funds can be compared. For example, a fund in the UK All Companies sector might be compared against the FTSE All-Share index of every company traded on the London Stock Exchange. A good fund manager will be able to beat the benchmark most of the time, but very few can.

  • Securities

    A contract representing something of financial value. Shares and bonds are the most common types of securities.

  • Managed funds

    Unlike most funds, which are restricted to investing in particular markets by the rules of their sector, managed funds can invest in just about anything. While they can have subtly different objectives, they are split into 'Active Managed', where the manager is given free reign; 'Balanced Managed', where the manager can invest a maximum of 85% in shares to reduce risk; and 'Cautious Managed' with a 60% maximum in shares.

  • Shares

    A share in a company represents part ownership of its assets (e.g. its buildings, intellectual property and so on) and its future income (paid out as dividends). The value of a share depends largely on other investors' expectations of the company's future growth and income.

  • Bonds

    Companies can issue bonds as a way of raising money. When you buy a bond, the company is agreeing to pay you a fixed income (hence the alternative name 'fixed income securities') for a certain time period, after which your money is repaid. If investors suspect a company may be unable to repay, they will demand a higher income or 'yield' - hence 'high yield bonds'.

  • Risk

    In investing, 'risk' can refer to different things, but essentially means the possibility that your objectives won't be met. In this context, risk is a calculation of the 'standard deviation' of returns each month – in otherwords, a measure of how rocky the returns are. The higher the rank, the less risk the fund takes with your money.

  • Sharpe Ratio

    This is a way of calculating 'risk adjusted returns' – i.e. how much value the fund is adding above the risk it takes to generate its returns. The higher the number the better.

  • Return

    A measure of how your investments have performed, relative to your initial investment. For example if you invest £1,000 in a fund, and a year later your investment is worth £1,100, you've made a 10% return.

  • Maximum loss

    Comparing the maximum loss for different managers (or between a manager and their benchmarks, as on these factsheets) over a given period is a good way of seeing who's doing the best job of safeguarding investors' money. Otherwise known as maximum 'drawdown', this is a measure of how much you would lose if you bought an investment at its most expensive and sold at its cheapest. For example if a fund was worth £1 a unit at one point but then fell to 50p – regardless of what happened in the meantime – the fund's loss would be 50%.

  • LATEST PRICE

    updated on 17/05/2013

  • £0.96
  • CHANGE IN PRICE

    from 16/05/2013

  • 0.11%
  • TOTAL RETURN

    over 3 years to 17/05/2013

  • 24.1%
  • Benchmark

    23.7%

Citywire Selection

Cazenove Multi-Manager Diversity

Register or Sign in to receive email alerts for items in your favourites whenever we write about them
Share Class: A Acc
Ranked 61/128 in Mixed Invt 20-60% Shares over 3 years

TOTAL RETURN over 1 month to 17/05/2013

Key:

 Cazenove Multi-Manager Diversity  Benchmark

Who runs this fund?

Cazenove

Go to website

The Cautious Managed sector

A mixture of shares, bonds and cash to deliver steadier returns with lower risk

How this fund has performed over

View full chart tool

Maximum loss on £1000

How Cazenove Multi-Manager Diversity compares to the sector over

How has Cazenove Multi-Manager Diversity performed?

  • Fund Performance
  • Return
  • Discrete performance
  • Change time period
  • £ or %

    Currency or Percentage

  • Reset

How Cazenove Multi-Manager Diversity compares to the sector over

Sectors: What is this fund investing in? Updated 31-03-2013

Top 10 holdings Updated 31-03-2013

News about: Cazenove Multi-Manager Diversity

  • Fund information

    • Launch Date 22 May 2002
    • Fund size (A Acc) £1101.5m
    • Base Currency GBX
    • ISIN GB0031549263
  • Purchase Info

    • Minimum initial investment £5000
    • Minimum additional investment £500
  • Charges

    • Annual management charge1%
    • Initial charge5%

Cazenove Multi-Manager Diversity

by Matthew Goodburn on Apr 15, 2013 at 15:30

Hoarding Cash

Cazenove Multi-manager Diversity  manager Marcus Brookes has taken the cash weighting in his £1 billion fund to its highest ever level at 29%.

Brookes and co-manager Robin McDonald are in capital preservation mode after a strong start to the year and with a mandate to beat cash plus 4% Brookes has been looking to bank some profits and await the next buying opportunity.

He told Citywire Selection: ‘Assets have run quite hard with so much stimulus in place and with CPI inflation at around 2.8% we have effectively returned a year’s return in the first three months.

‘Whether the correction coming is 5% or 25% I have no idea but we are in risk reduction mode because it is hard to fund any assets at cheap prices.

Three weeks ago the cash level in the fund had stood at 22% with half of that amount denominated in US dollars but after 18 months in which the duo have been increasing their dollar exposure on expectations of further dollar strength the exposure has now been reduced to 7%.

‘We thought the dollar was starting to form a bottom again. If it strengthens again we will take that exposure down to 3%.

The fund of funds is split into equally weighted thirds of fixed income and cash, equities and alternatives, and has the flexibility to take the alternatives and equities weighting 5% over or underweight the 33% level.

Currently the portfolio is at its lowest possible equity and alternative level of 28.3% apiece but Brookes said that if stock markets came off by at least 10% he would look to add exposure again.

With cash at 29% the fund has a further 15% in fixed income with the biggest position Richard Woolnough’s M&G Optimal Income Sterling fund which makes up almost 8.5% of the portfolio while in the alternatives portion, Philip Gibbs’ Jupiter Absolute Return fund has a 7.7% weighting.

In the equities segment the largest position is an 8% stake in Sanjeev Shah’s Fidelity Special Situations fund which Brookes bought after selling out of Neil Woodford’s Invesco Perpetual fund in mid-2012.

The biggest activity in equities over the past six months however has been a steady increase in exposure to Japan through dollar hedged exposure to GLG’s Japan CoreAlpha fund.

Reducing Japan

Brookes had taken the position up to almost 6.5% of the portfolio but has recently been reducing as he thinks the main uplift for Japanese equities has already happened, along with the main leg down in the value of the Yen.

‘We started to get bullish on Japan at the end of 2011 because it looked so cheap but we probably went overweight three or four months too early. We had seen massive asset inflation around most global markets which left Europe and Japan looking very cheap.’

 

‘Whatever the Japanese did to stimulate the economy we knew that they would try to weaken the currency so we avoided yen exposure and hedged into dollars. We went overweight Japan when Abe came to power and added QE and the 2% inflation target.

Brookes admits to being ‘shocked’ by the sheer scale of the money printing being carried out in Japan however.

‘They are printing $75 billion every month but when you consider the US is printing $85 billion a month and Japan’s economy is a third the size of the US economy,  it is the equivalent of QE1, QE2 and QE3 all put together and the biggest potential money easing ever.

Brookes’ decision to hedge his Japan exposure back into dollars has been vindicated by the aggressive weakening on the yen, which has seen it go from 76 to the dollar three months ago to around 100 today.

‘The Topix is up around 30% year to date but if you had bought your exposure in yen, you would have made just 18%.’

GLG Japan Core Alpha was originally added because it was exporter heavy, holding the large tech and autos stocks most likely to benefit from the weakening yen, but Brookes has now reduced the stake to 4% as he believes most of the gains have been made for now.

‘The big move has happened and the yen has weakened by about a third compared to the dollar. We still think Japan is a cheap market but in the near term the yen cannot go much further and a lot of global hedge funds are very short the yen.

Brookes believes it is much harder to find defensive assets than it was in 2008 with high yield bonds ‘trading tight’ and high yield returns ‘nowhere near the 13% they were at in 2008’.

‘We are not calling the end of the fixed income market but we currently see little value there.’

Over the five years to the end of March, the fund has returned 35% compared to the LCI FTSE AS/WexUK/Govt/ML Non-Gilt benchmark return of 23.7%.

Citywire Selection Verdict: Marcus Brookes Robin McDonald have consistently delivered, returning comfortably more than their inflation plus 4% target. This has been achieved with low volatility and drawdowns that have been among the lowest in the sector. They invest in funds that reflect their macroeconomic view and have profited from backing areas when they are out of favour. They are currently backing a strengthening dollar while shunning government bonds and commodities including gold. With stock markets having being on a strong run they have over a quarter of the portfolio in cash.

A consistently sound investment for those looking to diversify their holdings.

For more information view the latest fund factsheet .

What is Citywire Selection?

Citywire Selection is an investment guide containing around 150 of the best ways to invest in a range of areas, as chosen by our research team using a rigorous and transparent process.

We don't sell funds, so you can trust the independence of our recommendations.

Find out more or download the new Selection iPad App for free

Citywire Selection Updates

Latest updates on how the funds in Citywire Selection are investing

Sorry, this link is not
quite ready yet