Liontrust Special Situations

To print fund fact sheets, please use the print option in the Factsheet Tools section in the top right corner:

http://citywire.co.uk/fund/factsheet/c101869

Factsheet Tools

reset

No results found


Glossary

  • Fund

    A way for individual investors to pool their money together, allowing them to invest in assets that would otherwise be unobtainable

  • Fund manager

    The person who decides where the fund's money should be invested. As such, finding a talented manager (such as those with a Citywire rating) is of paramount importance

  • Sector

    Funds are grouped together into sectors, allowing fund managers to be judged against their benchmarks and peer group. Each sector has rules about what assets funds are allowed to invest in

  • Assets

    A generic term meaning 'what you own'. If you can buy it, it's an asset. In the world of investments the most common assets are shares, bonds, property and cash.

  • Asset class

    A group of assets with similar properties. For example, while shares will rise or fall in price individually, economic factors can affect all shares similarly. The same economic factors might affect bonds very differently – so shares and bonds are separate asset classes.

  • Asset allocation

    The process of deciding which asset classes to invest in. Successful asset allocation is often more important than selecting individual assets (for example deciding whether to invest mainly in shares, rather than which shares to invest in). Since most fund managers are tied to their sector rules, you need to either do your own asset allocation or buy a managed fund.

  • Benchmark

    A measure of how different areas of the markets are performing, against which funds can be compared. For example, a fund in the UK All Companies sector might be compared against the FTSE All-Share index of every company traded on the London Stock Exchange. A good fund manager will be able to beat the benchmark most of the time, but very few can.

  • Securities

    A contract representing something of financial value. Shares and bonds are the most common types of securities.

  • Managed funds

    Unlike most funds, which are restricted to investing in particular markets by the rules of their sector, managed funds can invest in just about anything. While they can have subtly different objectives, they are split into 'Active Managed', where the manager is given free reign; 'Balanced Managed', where the manager can invest a maximum of 85% in shares to reduce risk; and 'Cautious Managed' with a 60% maximum in shares.

  • Shares

    A share in a company represents part ownership of its assets (e.g. its buildings, intellectual property and so on) and its future income (paid out as dividends). The value of a share depends largely on other investors' expectations of the company's future growth and income.

  • Bonds

    Companies can issue bonds as a way of raising money. When you buy a bond, the company is agreeing to pay you a fixed income (hence the alternative name 'fixed income securities') for a certain time period, after which your money is repaid. If investors suspect a company may be unable to repay, they will demand a higher income or 'yield' - hence 'high yield bonds'.

  • Risk

    In investing, 'risk' can refer to different things, but essentially means the possibility that your objectives won't be met. In this context, risk is a calculation of the 'standard deviation' of returns each month – in otherwords, a measure of how rocky the returns are. The higher the rank, the less risk the fund takes with your money.

  • Sharpe Ratio

    This is a way of calculating 'risk adjusted returns' – i.e. how much value the fund is adding above the risk it takes to generate its returns. The higher the number the better.

  • Return

    A measure of how your investments have performed, relative to your initial investment. For example if you invest £1,000 in a fund, and a year later your investment is worth £1,100, you've made a 10% return.

  • Maximum loss

    Comparing the maximum loss for different managers (or between a manager and their benchmarks, as on these factsheets) over a given period is a good way of seeing who's doing the best job of safeguarding investors' money. Otherwise known as maximum 'drawdown', this is a measure of how much you would lose if you bought an investment at its most expensive and sold at its cheapest. For example if a fund was worth £1 a unit at one point but then fell to 50p – regardless of what happened in the meantime – the fund's loss would be 50%.

  • LATEST PRICE

    updated on 23/05/2013

  • £2.55
  • CHANGE IN PRICE

    from 22/05/2013

  • 1.08%
  • TOTAL RETURN

    over 3 years to 23/05/2013

  • 91.6%
  • Benchmark

    67.4%

Citywire Selection

Liontrust Special Situations

Register or Sign in to receive email alerts for items in your favourites whenever we write about them
Ranked 1/277 in UK (All Companies) over 3 years

TOTAL RETURN over 1 month to 23/05/2013

Key:

 Liontrust Special Situations  Benchmark

Who runs this fund?

Fund Group

Liontrust

How this fund has performed over

View full chart tool

Maximum loss on £1000

How Liontrust Special Situations compares to the sector over

How has Liontrust Special Situations performed?

  • Fund Performance
  • Return
  • Discrete performance
  • Change time period
  • £ or %

    Currency or Percentage

  • Reset

How Liontrust Special Situations compares to the sector over

Sectors: What is this fund investing in? Updated 28-02-2013

Top 10 holdings Updated 28-02-2013

News about: Liontrust Special Situations

  • Fund information

    • Launch Date 10 Nov 2005
    • Fund size () £661.7m
    • Base Currency GBX
    • ISIN GB00B0N6YF70
  • Purchase Info

    • Minimum initial investment £1000
    • Minimum additional investment £1000
  • Charges

    • Annual management charge1.8%
    • Initial charge5%

Liontrust Special Situations

by Saleem Shivji on May 21, 2013 at 17:00

Anthony Cross and Julian Fosh are not planning on a rotation of stocks in their Liontrust Special Situations fund despite recent underperformance relative to the UK market.

The fund has an excellent long-term track record, outperforming the FTSE All Share almost four-fold over five years, but has not fully particiapted since last summer's rally. Excess liquidity from quantitative easing is blamed, as low-quality companies with stretched balanced sheets have made sharp upward moves. 

‘We are facing increasing headwinds as the quant factors that explain the rally are low quality balance sheets which are heavily geared. This style factor has done very well,’ they explained.

The duo prefer not to speculate on how long the stockmarket rally will last. They are aware that there is a disconnect between the market and economic data, adding that, ‘These headwinds will run as long as they are going to run.’

Investment process unaffected

The AAA-rated managers acknowledge that some of their stock picks have done badly recently. Over one year to the end of April, electronic payment provider NCC and temporary power generation company Aggreko fell 22% and 20% respectively.

However they are keen to point out that of the 49 stocks that they hold, only two were down near the 20% mark over one year whereas 32 were up by around 20% over the same period. Several were up considerably more.

‘Hargreaves [Lansdown] is up 100%, Smart Metering Systems up 99% and Savills up 77% over one year,’ they said.

In addition, Cross and Fosh were clear that recent stock performance would not alter their ‘economic advantage’ investment process, which requires the companies invested in to have at least one of the following characteristics: intellectual property, strong distribution networks, or a high level of recurring income.

‘There is structurally no question that Agrekko will continue to deliver higher growth. Their forecast is double digits growth for the next 5 years,’ they said. ‘NCC also stated that their growth trends would remain intact and that this year’s downgrade reflects individual operational difficulties’ which do not affect the long-term investment strategy of the fund.

The pair have also recently initiated a position in Spectris, which they believe possess an economic advantage through the intellectual property associated with the precision control instruments it manufactures.

Another recent buy is telecommunications company Spirent which has significant intellectual property in the cyber security solutions and automotive industry systems spheres, as well as strong recurring revenues.

In keeping with their investment philosophy, the pair maintain a 9% cash holding, preferring to ‘invest on red days rather than blue.’

Increased fund size reduces available small cap universe

The fund has grown significantly in size, increasing by almost 2 and a half times over the past year to £880 million at the end of April. Cross and Fosh note that the stocks available to them within the small cap universe has diminished as a result, though the process they apply remains the same.

‘We now have to invest in companies with a £150 to £200 million market cap, which is bigger than three to four years ago,’ they said.

However, this has not prevented them holding more than quarter of the fund in stocks from the AIM pool. In this universe, the two managers are particularly bullish on mobile payments company Bango and patent translation business RWS, both of which have significant intellectual property and strong distribution networks.

Long term view on pharma

 

Despite disappointing Q1 earnings figures from GSK and AstraZeneca, and an imminent ‘patent cliff’, Cross and Fosh remain positive on pharmaceuticals. They claim that it is not the profit test that matters but the return-on-capital tests.

‘Pharmaceutical companies are able to shrink capital through R&D overhauls and employ share buy backs, enabling them to deliver the return on capital over the long term,’ they said.

Global and emerging markets exposure is by-product

The duo do not take a macro view in their bottom-up investment process and the fund is underweight the index in terms of its global exposure. A new Indian CEO at Diageo and Unilever’s increased stake in Indian company Hindustan Unilever suggests increased future exposure to emerging markets from the fund’s two largest holdings. However, Cross and Fosh are clear that this is not an explicit part of their strategy.

‘Emerging markets is a key strategic driver, although exposure is a by-product of global distribution networks,’ they explain. ‘Engineering companies also have emerging market exposure. Companies like [our holding] Sparax-Sarco have a nice spread around the world.’

Over five year to the end of April 2013, the Liontrust Special Situations fund has returned 114.7% versus the FTSE All Share return of 31.1%.

 Citywire Selection verdict: Cross and Fosh look primarily for out-of-favour UK large and mid-sized companies. However, their stock-picking approach also leads them to draw from the pool of AIM stocks, which comprise around a quarter of the fund's holdings. The portfolio has a heavy tech weighting which has aided recent performance. Conversely, telecoms, utilities and basic materials sectors are avoided, whilst financials are also given a relatively wide berth. The duo are not averse to placing ten per cent of the fund in cash, which does not detract from their outstanding risk-adjusted returns.

What is Citywire Selection?

Citywire Selection is an investment guide containing around 150 of the best ways to invest in a range of areas, as chosen by our research team using a rigorous and transparent process.

We don't sell funds, so you can trust the independence of our recommendations.

Find out more or download the new Selection iPad App for free

Portions of the information contained in this factsheet were derived by Citywire Financial Publishers Ltd using content supplied by Lipper, a Reuters Company.

Sorry, this link is not
quite ready yet