View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/money/article/a596302
Banking reforms: Osborne supports 'robust ring fence'
In a white paper published today the government has set out how it intends to make the banking industry safer and more compeitive.
Chancellor George Osborne has committed to enforce the separation of banks’ risky investment activities from more traditional personal and business lending in a bid to prevent a repeat of ‘the worst crisis in a generation’.
In a white paper today the government explained that ring-fenced banks will be prohibited from conducting the vast majority of international wholesale and investment banking. This will not stop a bank from failing, but will ensure the essential parts of the banking system – deposits and overdrafts – can continue without the need for a taxpayer-funded bailout.
Osborne has, however, agreed to widen the range of activities allowed within the ring-fenced operations to include ‘simple hedging products’ – such as protection against interest rate and currency fluctuations – to ensure small businesses have access to essential banking services. However these products must be provided in a way that does not expose the bank to increased market risk.
This is a significant concession to the banking lobby, which has fought hard to dilute the ring fencing proposals made by the Independent Commission on Banking (ICB) in its final report last September.
Mark Hoban, financial secretary to the Treasury, meanwhile, added that smaller banks, with under £25 billion worth of deposits, will be exempt from the ring fence requirements.
'Large, systemically important banks have a competitive advantage from the perceived implicit guarantee. Our targeted reforms remove that advantage, helping smaller banks and new entrants,' he explained.
The government has, however, raised the question as to whether ring fenced banks should be allowed to offer simple retail investment products. Many of the structured investment products, which are supposed to be a simpler alternative for high street investors, currently offered by banks are complex and risky in nature, which would go against what the government is trying to achieve by splitting retail and investment banking.
In its white paper the government also confirmed that savers will be given greater protection should a bank fail. At present bondholders are first in line for compensation, but the ICB’s proposals will see individual deposit holders ranked above bondholders in the event of a collapse.
The banking industry argues the move will lead bondholders to demand higher interest rates and result in increased borrowing costs for both individuals and businesses.
Richard Lloyd, executive director of Which?, however, said: 'Never again should consumers have to foot the bill for a banking bailout that last time cost every man, woman and child £2,000'.
The government also confirmed its support for:
- making it easier and quicker for customers to switch current accounts;
- improving transparency across all retail banking products;
- ensuring the sale of Lloyds’ 632 branches leads to the emergence of a strong 'challenger' bank;
- and increasing banks’ loss absorbing capacity.
New liquidity rules will require large banks to have at least 10% equity capital – some 3% more than the new international 7% minimum – as a safety net for future crises.
News sponsored by:
The Citywire guide to investment trusts
In association with Aberdeen Asset Management
What can SLI bring to the table for those who want to put their money into investment trusts?
More about this:
More from us
- Q&A: Why are retail banks being 'ring-fenced'?
- Independent Commission on Banking: Vickers defies the lobby
What others are saying
Tools from Citywire Money
From the Forums
Weekly email from The Lolly
Get simple, easy ways to make more from your money. Just enter your email address below
An error occured while subscribing your email. Please try again later.
Thank you for registering for your weekly newsletter from The Lolly.
Keep an eye out for us in your inbox, and please add firstname.lastname@example.org to your safe senders list so we don't get junked.