Citywire printed articles sponsored by:
View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/money/article/a584848
Barclays’ profits hit by extra £300 million PPI bill
Overall, however, Barclays said its first-quarter results were 'an encouraging start to the year’.
Markets
Barclays’ pre-tax profits fell £475 million in the first quarter of this year, partly because of an unexpected additional £300 million PPI bill.
The banking giant (BARC.L) had originally put aside £1 billion to cover the cost of paying compensation to customers who had been mis-sold the controversial insurance policy, but said an increase in claims in the past couple of months meant the bank had to increase its provision accordingly.
This puts Barclays’ total payment protection insurance (PPI) bill at £1.3 billion – with banks expected to pay out more than £6 billion in total.
Barclays' main explanation for the dip in profits, which compare with a £1.65 billion profit in the same period last year, however, was a ‘£2,620 million credit reversal’ – an accounting measure which shows the impact on Barclays’ profits if it had to buy back all of its debt now.
Barclays’ adjusted profit before tax – which ignores the additional PPI provision and accounting measure – increased 22% to £2.445 billion, which the bank said was driven by strong performances in both retail and business banking and corporate and investment banking.
Bob Diamond, chief executive of Barclays, said the first-quarter results were ‘an encouraging start to the year’, but he stressed that the banking environment remains unpredictable.
Looking forward, Barclays said: ‘The continued challenging market conditions mean it is too early to establish trend for the year’.
Barclays' credit card business, Barclaycard, meanwhile, reported a strong first quarter, with profits up 18% to £349 million from £296 million in the same quarter in 2011.
Barclays' share price was up 0.94% or 2p, to 213p after the results.
Sponsored By:
More about this:
Look up the shares
More from us
- PPI scandal continues to fuel bank complaints
- Chart of The Day: PPI victims paid £2 billion but owed billions more
What others are saying
Archive
Today's articles
FTSE dips below 6,800, Lloyds boosted by regulator by Gavin Lumsden
Nationwide: we are not the Co-op! by Gavin Lumsden
The Accumulator: 'Reduce bonds, buy Asia' by Gavin Lumsden
The Expert View: Marks & Spencer, Carnival and G4S by Harry Brooks
Pibs & perpetual bonds: latest rates & prices by Michelle McGagh
Tools from Citywire Money
Weekly email from The Lolly
Get simple, easy ways to make more from your money. Just enter your email address below
An error occured while subscribing your email. Please try again later.
Thank you for registering for your weekly newsletter from The Lolly.
Keep an eye out for us in your inbox, and please add noreply@emails.citywire.co.uk to your safe senders list so we don't get junked.
Read more...
FTSE dips below 6,800, Lloyds boosted by regulator
by Gavin Lumsden on May 22, 2013 at 11:42







3 comments so far. Why not have your say?
Scottino
Apr 26, 2012 at 13:31
I hate the duplicity of some companies' results. Either Barclays made a humungous profit or a statutory loss. The share price is massively below book which tends to support the loss scenario and that historically the ROA is extremely poor. Coupled with no movement in interim dividend it suggests that they cannot afford any increase for shareholders. Even a token change to 1.1p would help. The share price appears to be tracking the dividend level. It certainly does not track eps potential or book value. They do not even explain adequately the so-called credit reversal which is a massive amount of money. Is it reversing the similar gain booked last year to enhance results? All in all a very very poor statement by Barclays.
report thisRazzgox
Apr 26, 2012 at 17:08
And with these figures I now completely understand why Bob Diamond so justly deserves his fab salary package.
Please forgive me Robert for thinking that you were not worth it. How could I have been so stupid!!!!!!!!!!!
report thisRob Morrison
Apr 26, 2012 at 23:20
Beggars belief that banks were prepared to sell a product which I am sure they knew was not completely professional & on which the FSA had no opinion at the time.
Share holders & customers of banks have been taken for fools! Unfortunately, shareholders are paying throught the nose again, as PPI impacts on share value and dividends.
FSA requires a complete reorganisation.
report thisleave a comment
Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.