Citywire for Financial Professionals
Stay connected:

View the article online at

City grandee says HBOS crisis 'worst moment' of his career

Former Lloyds director Jan du Plessis has given evidence in the case brought against the bank by shareholders seeking £550 million in compensation for its disastrous purchase of HBOS in 2008.

City grandee says HBOS crisis 'worst moment' of his career

‘I felt this could be a tremendous opportunity to create value for shareholders,’ said Jan du Plessis, concerning Lloyds’ 2008 bid for HBOS which is now the subject of a law suit.

Du Plessis, now chairman of BT, served as audit committee chairman at Lloyds during the financial crisis.

According to the Times, he said that attending the audit committees of the two organisations as losses spiralled was ‘one of the worst moments’ of his professional life.

He made the statement during an appearance at court on behalf of Lloyds, though he is not accused of anything.  

He gave evidence during the case brought against Lloyds by shareholders seeking £550 million in compensation who are alleging that they were misled over the ‘disastrous’ purchase of HBOS back in 2008.

The class action of around 6,000 shareholders alleges that five former Lloyds directors, including ex-CEO Eric Daniels, failed in their due diligence duties by advocating the deal.

Former chairman Victor Blank, ex-finance director Tim Tookey, Helen Weir, who was head of retail and ex-wholesale banking boss Truett Tate are the other defendants. They all deny any wrongdoing, as does Lloyds as a company.

Du Plessis defended the bank’s decision to offer a premium to buy HBOS in his statement. He added that neither Lloyds’ management team nor the market appreciated the seriousness of problems in mid-October 2008 when the government told banks they would need to raise billions of pounds in new capital to ‘bullet-proof’ themselves.

He said that the government told Lloyds that if it decided to remain independent and backed out from the HBOS deal, it would have to raise £7 billion, which an adviser told the bank that was not possible.

'I felt this could be a tremendous opportunity to create value for shareholders' in a deal that was 'low-risk, considering the potential opportunity,' he said. 

'I recall feeling that the risks were manageable after hearing the executive team’s reports during the course of that meeting [on September 17, the day before the deal was announced].'

1 comment so far. Why not have your say?

richard tomkin

Nov 21, 2017 at 23:14

Talking about " grandees ",where are Gordon Brown and Lord Stevenson of Coddenham now ? Of course,they had nothing to do with the debacle,did they ?

report this

leave a comment

Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.

News sponsored by:

The Citywire Guide to Investment Trusts

In this guide to investment trusts, produced in association with Aberdeen Asset Management, we spoke to many of the leading experts in the field to find out more.

Watch Now

Today's articles

Tools from Citywire Money

From the Forums

+ Start a new discussion

Weekly email from The Lolly

Get simple, easy ways to make more from your money. Just enter your email address below

An error occured while subscribing your email. Please try again later.

Thank you for registering for your weekly newsletter from The Lolly.

Keep an eye out for us in your inbox, and please add to your safe senders list so we don't get junked.


MPs and fund groups pile pressure on Aviva over prefs

by Daniel Grote on Mar 21, 2018 at 10:54

Sorry, this link is not
quite ready yet