Citywire for Financial Professionals
Stay connected:

Citywire printed articles sponsored by:


View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/money/article/a561376

Citywire Selection Review: 10 funds we're adding and dropping

Citywire's head of research Jonathan Miller reveals which funds have been added – and dropped – from our Selection investment recommendations. 

Schroder Corporate Bond has been highly exposed to financials and shorting government bonds that rallied. Although there are no peripheral European bank holdings and manager Adam Cordery (pictured) thinks ‘the strongest banks are being run for bondholders’, we prefer the Invesco Perpetual Corporate Bond fund as a way of playing a recovery in financial bonds and a move to positive sentiment.

The Allianz RCM BRIC Stars fund has suffered during steep market falls and although it is likely to outperform during a strong rally, the choppy nature of this theme has seen the passive iShares FTSE BRIC 50 fare better.

Stock selection and sector allocation have been affecting Blackrock UK Dynamic. Although we have dropped the fund, its manager Mark Lyttleton believes the defensive nature of the core holdings, along with stock picks further down the portfolio, have strong potential for outperformance to return.

The underperformance of Martin Currie North America shows the difficulty in finding managers who can consistently beat the S&P 500 index. This is highlighted by our North America picks now being down to just two funds, one of which is a passive option.

Baring Absolute Return Global Bond was shorting government bonds throughout the whole of last year and concerns on performance contributed to the fund being closed.

Funds under review

We have also placed 11 of our fund selectons under review. Here we have seen underperformance for a longer period than we like which means we might drop them in our next half yearly review. But with markets displaying such irrational swings, it would be wrong to write them off just yet. Many of these have the potential to make a big rebound, making a decision difficult.

Among them is the £1.9 billion JPM Natural Resources fund which is going through a manager change, with Citywire AA-rated Ian Henderson passing on management to Neil Gregson. Henderson’s 20 years at the helm have seen stellar returns in this volatile asset class. We are currently taking a prudent view as the transition takes place and will keep readers updated with our analysis.

Also under review is the £2.2 billion Fidelity Special Situations fund. Manager Sanjeev Shah had the huge task of following Anthony Bolton when he took on the fund in 2008. His value style has fallen on hard times in the past two years. His continued belief that there will be a turnaround in banks has hit performance hard, along with stock specific issues with BSkyB, Yell and more recently Ocado. We have put the portfolio under review, but what remains certain is that if we have even a hint of a recovery this fund will prosper.

The other Selection funds under review are:

Find out more: see the complete list of Citywire Selection funds.

Sign in / register to view full article on one page

4 comments so far. Why not have your say?

Redundant (Old Timer?)

Jan 27, 2012 at 13:38

We have also placed 11 of our fund selectons under review.

Citywire I only counted 3 - links for the others appear to be missing

report this

Franco

Jan 28, 2012 at 14:07

Rubbish Jonathan Miller.

Your fund selections are based on past performance, which as you very well know has no influence on future performance. If you had the investor's interest at heart you would be advising them to invest in index trackers and for managed funds to cut their exorbitant charges by half, to bring them in line with those in the US.

For some one investing a lump sum to help his income in 40 years, a fund with TER 2.5% and there are plenty of them, the fund managers will take 65% of the assets. It beats high way robbery any time.

report this

banjofred

Feb 11, 2012 at 07:08

Franco, right on.

I think as people vote with their feet, the funds will get the message.

I have taken the view that I dont care about charges of up to 2%, as long as I am making a big percentage too.

They can charge what they like as long as they make me big bucks

But we know thats not the case dont we children?. Shall we look in the box and find out how much they are taking whilst making no money at all.??

No wonder Jesus kicked over the tables of the usurers outside the temple. I am not religious, but there is a message from 2000 years ago.

Time for change thats for sure.

report this

jones the spy

Feb 14, 2012 at 17:38

I agree with Franco on charges, I like the Lion Trust but with annual charges of 1.8% they likely to take cream off most benefits.

I would also like to see investors vote with their feet, but likewise is it not time for the FSA to state the maximum charge which in my opinion should be no more .75%

Come on Jonathan Miller lets have your support on this!!!

report this

leave a comment

Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.

Tools from Citywire Money

Today's articles

From the Forums

+ Start a new discussion
Sorry, this link is not
quite ready yet