Citywire printed articles sponsored by:
View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/money/article/a426927
Company pensions to be scaled back to meet cost of reforms
Many companies will reduce the benefits they offer in pension schemes for employees as they seek to claw back the money they will have to spend to meet government reforms.
Markets
Many companies will reduce the benefits they offer in pension schemes for employees as they seek to claw back the money they will have to spend to meet government reforms.
Companies will have to ‘auto-enrol’ all of their employees into a pension scheme from 2012. But according to research from actuaries, 41% of companies will reduce the benefits provided to existing and future company pension scheme members.
More than two thirds of the large companies surveyed by the Association of Consulting Actuaries said they fear that the scheme appears complex.
The actuaries’ report also found that three quarters of employers think that employees who have less than three months’ service should not be auto-enrolled.
Criticisms
The requirement to get all workers saving for a pension comes as fears grow about the toll an increasing ageing population will have on the state. Many people aren’t prepared for retirement, and currently some 750,000 of employers don’t offer any pension provision.
The Nest scheme, formerly known as Personal Accounts, has been introduced to help solve the lack of savings. But it has come under fire for the high charges that the scheme will incur which include a 0.3% annual management charge as well as a temporary 2% contribution charge which would help the scheme repay government loans. But this ‘temporary’ charge could be levied on savers for 20 years, pensions minister Angela Eagle has said.
The Confederation of British Industry has warned that workers – particularly those in their 40s and 50s – will realise that putting money into Nest will leave them worse off when compared with saving into a workplace pension with significantly lower average charges.
There are also concerns that low income families could lose means tested benefits.
How will Nest work?
The plans to auto-enrol workers, (put them automatically into a pension scheme, but then give them the option to opt out) is part of a scheme to encourage low to middle earners to save more for retirement. To qualify jobholders must be aged between 22 and State Pension Age and earning more than £5,034 and not more than £33,540 a year.
The total minimum contribution to all jobholders’ retirement savings pots will have to equal 8% of earnings. Of this the employer will have to contribute a minimum of 3% while the rest will be made up of tax relief and the jobholder’s contribution. There will be a £3,600 per year limit on how much can be paid into each member’s retirement savings pot.
The ‘Nest’ scheme has been created for employers to use to meet these new requirements, but employers can choose Nest or another qualifying workplace pension scheme to meet their new duties.
Tools from Citywire Money
More about this:
More from us
- High charges could force millions out of Nest pensions scheme
- Steve Bee: Finally, some clarity on the future of pensions saving
- Morning Line: Will Clegg and Cameron provide a better retirement for us all?
- A charge akin with toll bridges to pay for pensions
- Morning Line: Population growth and scorched public services – an explosive mix?
Archive
Today's articles
- 5 reasons you should worry about Greece and the euro
- Market blog: FTSE inches up as G8 leaders eye growth
- Smart Investor: not even the euro crisis makes me like gold
- Investment trusts: 10 great dividend growers
- Pension saving hits new low but 'unrealistic expectations' persist
- Diary of a Dumb Investor: bigger, badder… dumber?
- Asian equities gain as China turns focus towards growth
- Citywire Top Stocks Daily News Digest





3 comments so far. Why not have your say?
Keith Snell
Aug 31, 2010 at 09:59
As the civil service will have had a hand in the rule making by definition the scheme will be over complicated. No automatic opt out for staff with less than 3 months service is just plane daft.
report thisA Donald
Aug 31, 2010 at 10:06
Will Civil Service pensions be funded in the same manner?
Will Civil Service pensions be subject to market forces or still gauranteed a percentage of their retirement wage?
report thisjoe stalin
Aug 31, 2010 at 13:06
Things might have been very different if the Labour Government had not done a Robert Maxwell on the pensions industry.
report thisleave a comment
Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.