Citywire printed articles sponsored by:
View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/money/article/a634724
Credit card insurer fined £10.5m for six years of mis-selling
CPP pressured customers to take out insurance that was worthless.
by Michelle McGagh on Nov 15, 2012 at 09:53
Credit card insurance company CPPGroup has been slapped with a record fine by the City regulator for mis-selling insurance policies to the public over a six-year period
CPP (CPPG.L) has been told to pay £10.5 million in fines and pay around £14.5 million compensation to customers. The total cost to the firm of the Financial Services Authority's investigation will exceed £33 million.
Shares in the York-based company have plunged 75% this year but bounced 10% or 2.5p higher to 26.75p today as investors saw the fine drawing a line under the scandal.
Between January 2005 and March 2011, CPP sold its card protection policy by telling customers they would receive £100,000 of cover, which they already received from their banks, at a cost of £35 a year.
When selling its identity protection plan, which cost £84 a year, CPP overstated the risks and consequences of identity theft.
The products were sold through the company’s own sales channels or partners, such as high street banks, which referred customers to CPP.
CPP sold 4.4 million policies and generated £354.5 million gross profit from the sales. In the six years investigated by the FSA 18.7 million policies were renewed generating an income of £656.5 million.
The FSA found the CPP process was sales-focused and sales agents were encouraged to be ‘overly persistent’ in persuading people to purchase products even after they said they did not want them.
It also gave sales people targets for successfully dissuading customers who wanted to cancel their policies and did not prevent sales people telling customers to buy the product on the basis that they could then cancel during the cooling-off period.
The FSA found CPP renewed and took payments from customers without reminding them when it did not have current addresses and could not send renewal documents.
CPP has now improved its renewal process and extended its cooling-off period from 14 to 60 days. It has also agreed with the FSA requirements to stop new sales of products and trying to prevent customers from leaving.
The FSA said it was concerned about insurance that offered ‘little or no value to the customer’ and customers do not generally need insurance for fraudulent transactions on lost or stolen cards.
Charles Gregson, non-executive chairman of CPP, said the board ‘clearly recognises the seriousness of past failings’ and ‘is deeply sorry for any customer detriment’.
CPP chief executive officer Paul Stobart, who joined in October 2011 to develop a customer-led strategy, said ‘there were significant failings in the systems and controls environment within CPP in the UK’.
He added: ‘Many things have changed and are changing at CPP…The transformation programme covering people, customers, products and governance is well advanced.’
More about this:
Look up the shares
More from us
- Former HBOS executive banned and fined £500k
- RBS boss Hester warns of FSA fine over Libor
- Ex-UBS advisers to pay £1.3m FSA fines after court battle
- Advice firm fined £58k for investing pensions in risky funds
- Queen's bank fined £8.75m for three years of failings
Archive
Weekly email from The Lolly
Get simple, easy ways to make more from your money. Just enter your email address below
An error occured while subscribing your email. Please try again later.
Thank you for registering for your weekly newsletter from The Lolly.
Keep an eye out for us in your inbox, and please add noreply@emails.citywire.co.uk to your safe senders list so we don't get junked.
Latest from The Lolly
The six cash ISAs beating inflation by Michelle McGagh
Why you need to work a day a week for your pension by Michelle McGagh
Investors race to grab unregulated Jockey bond by Michelle McGagh
Newcastle woos regular savers with 3% ISA by Michelle McGagh
Our 'wake-up' call from longer, sicker lives by Michelle McGagh




6 comments so far. Why not have your say?
Anthony Tinslay
Nov 15, 2012 at 12:16
Have I read the figures correctly?
TOTAL income of £656m resulting in a gross PROFIT of £354m of which the total fine/compensation cost to company is estimated to be just £33m. Sounds to me as though it was a very worthwhile and profitable operation for the company to get away with a 10% of gross profit fine. The shareholders must be over the moon.
report thismo khan
Nov 15, 2012 at 14:36
and guess who gets this £10.5m... FSA of course, they may if they feel like it, even pay out tiny to the victims they have no legal jurisdition to do so, so , I doubt that will pay instead. it will not go any where other than to themselves and who owns FSA....The Banks of course..so still a nice earner for Finance, trickery...
I doubt if shareholders would benefit as, on the other side they banks will use the fine as an excuse to mark shares down etc..etc. so its win...win for the know in the Banx......Too Big to fail .....
report thispeter montgomery
Nov 15, 2012 at 14:58
Why are people not in jail for this? I really cannot see such excesses being curtailed by mere fines(on the corporate bodies) alone. In Singapore ,miscreants would be awarded a dozen strokes of the Rattan(cane) in addition to any custodial or financial penalty.While I am not in favour of capital punishment,I think something along the singapore line for financial demeanours would work wonders in behavioural improvement!
report thisT Smith
Nov 15, 2012 at 15:37
I think the leading miscreants (the directors and managers responsible, rather than the sales staff) should be put in the stocks, which would be set up in prominent public places.
Prison sentences, too, for principal offenders. After all, it sounds fraudulent to sell something that people already have.
report thisAnonymous 1 needed this 'off the record'
Nov 16, 2012 at 13:08
How do we get compensation?
report thisDEZ
Nov 17, 2012 at 18:06
As stated above the penalty/impact on these rich "barrow boys" is a joke and no repercussions on their directors being barred for a very long time. The FSA
must get tougher on these wide boys otherwise nothing will ever change. Why did it take FSA so long before anyone woke up tin their sleepy towers! Still it was good to know that the honest john banks who acted as their agents, drawing commission, were still looking after their bank customers by making sure they only sold them crap policies ie business as usual. What a total shower of low lives and sleeping policemen ... not sure who is worse . !
report thisleave a comment
Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.