Citywire printed articles sponsored by:
View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/money/article/a609198
Earnings gap hits women's pensions
Women are relying on their partners' pensions to support them as the impact of the gender earnings gap creeps into retirement.
by Michelle McGagh on Aug 06, 2012 at 09:38
The average 50-year-old woman is earning 60% less than a man of the same age, pushing a third of women to rely on their partner’s pension to fund their retirement.
A study by MetLife, an insurer, found an £11,000 average earnings gap between men and women at 50 years of age. Men take home an average of £30,000, compared to £19,000 for women.
The gap can be blamed partly on the number of older women in full-time work: just 44% of 50-year-old women work full time compared with 71% of men.
The impact of the gender earnings gap hits women not just when they are employed but also when they retire. The research showed a third of women were relying on their partner’s pension to provide income in retirement, and just 22% of women said they were the main income earner.
Both men and women, however, were struggling for financial security and have been dubbed the 'Uncertain Generation' by MetLife. The average 50-year-old said they would need an annual income of £38,600 to feel secure, and just a third of them believed their earning power has not yet peaked.
Dominic Grinstead, managing director of MetLife UK, said the Uncertain Generation were being forced to make decisions about their financial future in the context of economic uncertainty and volatility.
‘The average 50-year-old may feel they are a long way from retirement, but they are unfortunately also a long way from feeling financially secure, and just one in three is optimistic about their earning power.’
A survey by MGM Advantage earlier this year showed more people were returning to work after retiring for financial or social reasons.
A total of 9% of the retired population, one million people, are still in work. The retired population racks up 300 million hours a year in part-time work, worth £46.2 billion a year.
Many have had to return to work, and others have had to delay retirement, as a result of a combination of factors. People are saving less and being hit by faltering annuity rates when they reach retirement, and also have to cope with poor savings rates as the interest rate remains at an all-time low of 0.5%.
More about this:
More from us
- Five pension pitfalls women need to know about
- Women and pensions: won't save or can't save?
- Pressure grows on govt to help women save for pensions
- Why women cannot afford to put off pension saving
- My financial life: why I have to work in retirement
- Pensioners return to work as poverty and boredom take their toll
Archive
Weekly email from The Lolly
Get simple, easy ways to make more from your money. Just enter your email address below
An error occured while subscribing your email. Please try again later.
Thank you for registering for your weekly newsletter from The Lolly.
Keep an eye out for us in your inbox, and please add noreply@emails.citywire.co.uk to your safe senders list so we don't get junked.
Latest from The Lolly
A new look at fund charges and why they matter by Gavin Lumsden
Flood pact between insurers and government in danger by Michelle McGagh
Friday Five: times when you need financial advice by Michelle McGagh
Government mulls CTF tax-free extension by Michelle McGagh
Number of over-65s in work jumps 10% in a year by Michelle McGagh
Read more...
A new look at fund charges and why they matter
by Gavin Lumsden on May 17, 2013 at 13:49





1 comment so far. Why not have your say?
Rob Walker
Aug 06, 2012 at 14:51
What the survey tells us is that most pensions are held in the Spouse's name that's all. If the wife with her husband then she's proportionately no better or worse off than when the husband is earning and presumably in most cases the income is family income whether pension or salary. However, if the couple split up before retirement there are now adequate methods of compensation and for splitting pensions so the wife is not disadvantaged. So what's the big deal Met Life? Or are you just upping the anxiety to generate a bit more pensions business?
report thisleave a comment
Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.