Citywire printed articles sponsored by:
View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/money/article/a403089
Ending Child Trust Funds won't stop parents saving for children
It would appear that the axing of Child Trust Funds by George Osborne, the new chancellor, has been vindicated.
Prev Close:
More FTSE charts & pricesPrev Close:
More FTSE charts & pricesPrev Close:
More FTSE charts & pricesby Lorna Bourke on May 29, 2010 at 00:01
It would appear that the axing of Child Trust Funds by George Osborne, the new chancellor, has been vindicated. New research commissioned by F&C Investments indicates that 70% of parents of under-eights would continue to save for them even although the Child Trust Fund is to be abolished. A further 16% were undecided, while just 14% said the abolition of the CTF would stop them from saving for their children.
The research revealed that free money is not the biggest factor in investing for children. Overall 74% of those surveyed saved for at least one of their children, with 50% of those saving having one or more child born before the CTF eligibility start date of 1st September 2002.
It proves what we all know – the middle classes will always save for their future – and it could point the way to a cut in pension tax relief to the basic rate of 20%. How many responsible adults would stop saving for their retirement just because tax relief had been reduced? The benefits of CTFs, apart from the giveaways of £250 or £500, were largely illusory anyway given that very few children are taxpayers and would gain little or nothing from the ‘tax free’ status of CTFs.
CTF vouchers will be reduced from £250 (£500 for low income families) to £50 (£100 for low income families) from 1st August this year, and no new vouchers would be issued after 1st January 2011. Parents with vouchers issued before January next year will still be able to open a CTF and top up their child's account with up to £1,200 a year, which will grow tax-free until the child reaches 18.
But it must be galling for an investment house like F&C to find that bank and building society accounts remain the most popular choice, with 68% of parents who save saying they use such an account already, while a further 15% would consider doing so. There was considerable reluctance among parents to take risk with their children's investments. Just 7% said they used a children's investment product based on investment trusts or OEICs.
You will be able to continue investing in CTFs after the vouchers are abolished and for cautious parents who want the highest return - with only the risk of inflation eroding the buying power - the best CTF savings account comes from Hanley Economic Building Society which is paying 5% on sums of £250 and upwards. However, you can only open an account at a branch which means you have to live locally. There is a big drop in the return paid on the next best account from Yorkshire Building Society which is offering just 3% on sums of £250 or more and the rate includes a bonus of 0% for the first 12 months. You can open an account by post at or at a branch.
These rates are so low you might want to listen to Jason Hollands, a director of F&C: ‘Parents' reluctance to take risk with their children's investments means they may be missing out on the chance of superior returns. An investment period of 18 years should be enough to ride out short term ups and downs in the equity markets, though of course returns are not guaranteed.’
Most private client stockbrokers offer a self-select CTF wrapper and Citywire provides performance figures and ratings for all mutual funds eligible for CTF investment or you can consult an IFA for advice on suitable investments.
Tools from Citywire Money
Today's articles
- The Friday Five: lessons from Dickens about money
- Barclays: the figures to make you – but not Bob – weep
- GlaxoSmithKline: why I like this 'big and boring' share
- The week in numbers: loans, bills and funny money
- Week Ahead: a ‘pleasant interlude’ and a mighty market mover
- Saturday Papers: Cameron calls for truce on bonuses
- Britain’s biggest savers: who they are and where they invest
- Tesco profit warning shows vulnerability of defensives, Steve Cordell says





4 comments so far. Why not have your say?
john
May 29, 2010 at 11:44
Absolute rubbish. F&C has a vested interest in people saving for their children/grandchidren.
The points about CTfs was the encouragement and discipline it gave to people to save for children and the fact that the child could not touch the money until age 18.
A cheap alternative to a trust fund. Now all is gone.
And F&C sales a will drop dramatically.
report thisSteve P
May 29, 2010 at 12:14
AFAIK child's income on cash derived from parents is taxed on parents, so the article is wrong to say:-
"The benefits of CTFs, apart from the giveaways of £250 or £500, were largely illusory anyway given that very few children are taxpayers and would gain little or nothing from the ‘tax free’ status of CTFs."
Why not just let children have ISAs?
report thisStephen M
May 29, 2010 at 14:48
Giving 18 year olds a wad of cash they haven't earned? Great if you run a pub but not much else. Unless it was ring fenced for things like education it was always a recipe for disaster.
report thissybil
Jun 04, 2010 at 16:38
At long last, if the government want 18yr olds to have further education,
please send direct to an educative establishment or pay an education bill.
Unearned money in teenagers' pockets,is likely to go on fast motorbikes or cars or the "offy" .
Storing up trouble for a few years time.
report thisleave a comment
Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.