Citywire for Financial Professionals
Stay connected:

View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/money/article/a647911

Fiscal cliff Q&A: what does it mean for investors?

Markets appear ecstatic with last night's deal to avoid sweeping tax rises in the US. Job done?

 
Fiscal cliff Q&A: what does it mean for investors?

What has been achieved?

After long negotiations US democrats and republicans have finally found a compromise to prevent sweeping tax rises that threatened pushing the US economy into recession.

A bill was passed first in the Senate and then in the House of Representatives. Only President Barack Obama’s signature is now needed.

This is a victory of sorts for Obama as wealthy Americans will pay more tax – as George W Bush era income tax cuts will expire for top earners, but not for other workers – among myriad other measures.

What’s left to do?

Lots. This is far from the ‘grand bargain’ Obama had hoped for.

While seeing off tax hikes, the threat of spending cuts has not been overcome, merely delayed. The so-called sequester has been postponed for two months, allowing Congress more time to strike a deal to prevent automatic spending cuts.

Is that it?

No. Congress also must soon raise the ‘debt ceiling’ after the US hit its debt limit of $16.4 trillion on New Year’s Eve. Treasury secretary Timothy Geithner has taken ‘extraordinary measures’ to create ‘headroom’ (his own words) which would keep a theoretical default at bay for another couple of months.

Congress has never failed to raise the debt limit – actually it has done so more than 70 times in the past half decade – but the last-minute negotiations of Summer 2011 were tense enough for Standard & Poor’s to strip the US of its AAA credit rating.

But that’s not all. The US hasn’t actually passed a law for a 2013 budget, even though the fiscal year began in October. If a ‘continuing resolution’ that expires in March is not extended the government could be partially shutdown; literally suspending operations. And this has happened before.

Obama last night said he hopes future negotiations will entail ‘less drama, a little bit less brinkmanship, not scare the heck out of folks quite as much’. But the world’s most powerful man may not get his wish.

Why did it take so long?

The drawn-out negotiations over the deal reflect a fundamental political divide between republicans and democrats over the size of government, entitlements and tax rates. It also reflects just how polarized US congress has become.

According to US press reports, neither party was entirely happy with the result. However, as Republican Lou Barletta told the Washington Post: ‘I don’t know if playing chicken with the American people at this point is in the best interest of the people.’

What does it mean for investors?

The response from markets was unequivocal: the deal is good.

Markets around the world rose, with Britain’s FTSE 100 finally breaking out of a narrow range to climb above the 6,000 mark for the first time since July 2011.

Emboldened investors sought out riskier assets such as bank shares, the euro and commodities.

Yet weary market commentators say the deal (which most of them had expected) resembles the sort of political fudges achieved by bickering eurozone politicians: markets typically enjoy a relief rally – such as they are today – before the reality sets in that this-isn’t-over-yet.

Read this morning's market report: FTSE breaks through 6,000 after US averts dreaded fiscal cliff

Where does this leave the US economy?

Well, at least not in a deep recession. 

However, the bill will do little to tackle America’s growing debt pile. In fact the legislation adds nearly $4 trillion to US fiscal deficits over the next decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

Crucially, the ratings agencies are yet to cast judgement, but no doubt they’ll maintain a sceptical eye on the outstanding budgetary issues.

While not spectacular in 2012, pitched against its developed world counterparts, the US economy doesn’t look so bad.

The housing market has started to turn around, unemployment is falling (though still high) and the Federal Reserve stands ready to do whatever it takes to encourage both of these trends.

Today’s news removes a significant source of uncertainty for consumers, investors and businesses.

What else should investors be worried about this year?

While an important hurdle has been removed, US fiscal policy will remain a concern for global investors. Among commentators responding to today's news, Mike Turner, head of global strategy and asset allocation at Aberdeen Asset Management, was among the most gloomy: 'The tax rises agreed by the House of Representatives last night may have averted a near-term recession, but an economic crisis induced by the deteriorating credit worthiness of the United States, still looms,' he said.

Like this time last year, politics remains at the top of investors’ list of threats in 2013.

Elections in Italy and Germany will remind investors what is at stake in the stuttering eurozone. Likewise the growing debate in the UK about EU membership will keep the focus on European fracturing.

Spain meanwhile continues to keep markets guessing about whether it will finally seek a full bailout. As in other austerity-ridden European nations, enraged Spaniards could take to the streets again and in turn spook investors.

Global growth prospects remain weak, but sluggish growth wasn’t enough to prevent strong stock market rises in 2012. Most investment houses and banks are remarkably upbeat about the prospects for markets in 2013. At least the Chinese economy appears to have avoided a ‘hard landing’ while we don’t have a 2012-style string of major elections and leadership changes to rock markets.

Watch 'What investors can look forward to in 2013':

I want more detail: where should I go?

The BBC’s Mark Mardell explains why Obama has developed a relish for the fight:

BBC News: Shoving the battle down the road

The New York Times provides more detail on how the relief rally could peter out:

NYT: Even With Fiscal Agreement, Investors Facing Imminent Obstacles

The newspaper also gives a taste of the debate among Republicans:

NYT: Lines of Resistance on Fiscal Deal

Try this for more detail on what has been agreed:

CNNMoney: Fiscal cliff deal stops many tax hikes, but leaves big issues pending

And the White House has this (decidedly partisan) explainer on the Bipartisan Tax Agreement:

What You Need to Know About the Bipartisan Tax Agreement

10 comments so far. Why not have your say?

snoekie

Jan 02, 2013 at 17:15

Just looking at today, not thinking about tomorrow and addressing pressing issues.

The chickens are getting ready to come home to roost.

report this

tough enough

Jan 02, 2013 at 20:41

Well all they have to do now is drag the debt mountain up mount doom and throw it into the flames of Mordor .........shouldnt be too difficult for a bunch of idiotic Americans if a bunch of socialist elves ,hobbits and dwarfs aided by a wizard can do it with a gold ring.......

.

report this

Anonymous 1 needed this 'off the record'

Jan 02, 2013 at 20:52

Parhaps they can call in Bush ,Cameroon and Osborn as consultants ..that would firm up the team..

report this

Anthony O' Grady

Jan 02, 2013 at 22:14

Ironic isn't it? Us treasury yields are the lowest in over 30 years, and yet the US was far more credit worthy in 1982 than it is now. Treasuries are still perceived to be a safe haven, but why? Crazy world, and when treasuries do bomb which they will higher interest payments will kill the US stone dead.

report this

derek farman

Jan 03, 2013 at 09:39

Spend, spend, spend, spend . Why don't the political lame brains of the USA and EEC get it ?. The fiscal recklessness has to stop.

report this

fatcat

Jan 03, 2013 at 10:38

At least "Osborn and Bush" have and had a plan to cut debt. Why an African backward country is sticking its nose in beats me!

report this

madmitch

Jan 03, 2013 at 11:13

Bush! Debt! Cut! Plan!

Enlighten us.

report this

Pagoda

Jan 03, 2013 at 11:45

Private investors looking for reliable sources of income on the markets will feel relief rather than euphoria. If printed 'money' was in future funnelled directly into aspiring industry via a new UK Business Bank this would help to relieve economic stagnation in this country.

report this

tony williams

Jan 04, 2013 at 10:55

can you imagine lending in the usa mortgages to people who had no collateral or any intention or ability to ever pay it back. i had a property in the states, disaster, opted out. usa seems like the history of the mark, too many fat cats with big mouths

report this

derek farman

Jan 04, 2013 at 11:42

TONY WILLIAMS ....... Agree it is beyond comprehension.

When I tried for my mortgage many years ago, the questions were rigorously geared to ensure I had the ability to pay it back.

Latterly we entered the era where all of us were being constantly bombarded by banks to borrow on credit cards irrespective of whether we were good credit risks or not .

Additionally the granting of huge mortgages to people under self certification had to be one of the stupidest things ever. But the banks and their so called regulators could not see it. I call it gross negligence.

Now governments are the main borrowers, and they look less and less as if they will be able to pay back. What a reckless incompetent world we live in.

report this

leave a comment

Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.

News sponsored by:

The Citywire guide to investment trusts

In association with Aberdeen Asset Management

Fund managers from Standard Life Investments quizzed on investment trusts


What can SLI bring to the table for those who want to put their money into investment trusts?

Today's articles

Tools from Citywire Money

From the Forums

+ Start a new discussion

Weekly email from The Lolly

Get simple, easy ways to make more from your money. Just enter your email address below

An error occured while subscribing your email. Please try again later.

Thank you for registering for your weekly newsletter from The Lolly.

Keep an eye out for us in your inbox, and please add noreply@emails.citywire.co.uk to your safe senders list so we don't get junked.

Read more...

4 reasons why savings rates aren't rising

by Michelle McGagh on Aug 29, 2014 at 15:13

Sorry, this link is not
quite ready yet