Citywire for Financial Professionals
Share this page:
Stay connected:

Citywire printed articles sponsored by:


View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/money/article/a407239

Government promises swift end to age 65 default retirement age

Pensions minister promises 'vigorous' early action on the default retirement age of 65 in company pension schemes.

by William Robins on Jun 16, 2010 at 10:38

Government promises swift end to age 65 default retirement age

The default retirement age for pension schemes will be repealed much sooner than initially suggested by the coalition government, pensions minister Steve Webb has revealed.

Speaking to an audience of pensions professionals at the International Longevity Centre (ILC), Webb (pictured) said the coalition government’s plans to phase out the default retirement age (DRA), would be pursued ‘vigorously’.

‘The first thing we want to get rid of is the DRA, which, it seems to me, is an anomaly. The coalition document said it would be phased out, but you should understand that as a vigorous burn,’ said Webb.

DRA rules allow employers to retire employees, both male and female, at 65 regardless of their ability to work longer. The previous government had promised to review the rules but had made no firm committment to abolish them.

‘It will be vigorously phased out and while that also depends on my colleagues at the business department they have been very keen to get on the job.’

Webb repeated his claim that he would try to avoid ‘the curse of instrumentalism’ and bring in sweeping reforms to UK pensions.

‘What I hope to do, while fire-fighting, is look at the bigger picture. There is a disjunction of responsibility between the Treasury team members and we will need to work together.’

‘At the top of the pile is the state pension. When answering questions at conferences I only need one answer and that is reform of means testing and the state pension. It must be made simple and a strong foundation on which people can build pension savings.’

Webb repeated his support for early access to pension funds, arguing that many home repossesions could have been avoided by not locking away assets, and promises a 'speedy and thorough review' of the National Employment Savings Trust (Nest).

4 comments so far. Why not have your say?

Bernard

Jun 16, 2010 at 15:07

SInce local authority employees have a 35-hour week and, as I understand it, retire at 60, how will such a move affect their workiing conditions, that are so much more favourable than those of the private sector?

report this

whitegates

Jun 17, 2010 at 11:44

Bernard,

LA employees work a 36 hour week and although some do retire at 60 (they need 40 years employment to recive a full penson) the default retirement age is moving towards 65. The real scandal is that you can't continue to work after 65 if you wish to and perfectly able to and they won't accept an application for employment after your 64th birthday.

Talk about discrimination.

report this

ian grieve

Jun 19, 2010 at 20:34

Only an unimaginative idiot would want to carry on working after 65 or someone foolish enough not to have started planning for retirement years ago,

report this

June Smith

Jun 21, 2010 at 13:55

Why shouldn't one have the opportunity to continue working after the age of 65 if the job is interesting, challenging and remunerative. The trend in Europe is to extend retirement age, for example, Germany to 67. A longer working life is certainly in line with longer life expectancy.

report this

leave a comment

Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.

Sorry, this link is not
quite ready yet