Citywire for Financial Professionals
Stay connected:

View the article online at

Hargreaves Lansdown angers tracker investors with platform fee

(Update) Hargreaves Lansdown has defended its monthly platform fee on tracker funds saying it complies with forthcoming regulation and is a prelude for more passive funds in its Vantage range.

Hargreaves Lansdown angers tracker investors with platform fee

(Update) Hargreaves Lansdown has attempted to explain why it is introducing a new monthly platform fee on all tracker funds - and some others - on its Vantage platform.

Platform fee is not anti-tracker

Hargreaves Lansdown customers have complained that the decision to levy a £1-£2 monthly fee on affected funds from 31 December will make it more expensive to invest in popular, low-cost tracker funds such as the HSBC FTSE All Share Index fund.

However, Mark Dampier, head of research at the discount broker, denied the accusation from some customers that the move was 'anti-tracker'. He said Hargreaves had seen an explosion of investor interest in tracker funds - both exchange traded funds (ETFs) and passively run unit trusts - in the past three years and that it would use the extra money raised from the platform fee to extend its range of such funds on Vantage.

Dampier added that platform fee was in line with a recent change of policy by the Financial Services Authority. Over the summer the regulator announced it was minded to ban investment platforms, such as Hargreaves Lansdown, from receiving rebates from fund managers.

More fees could follow

Traditionally, actively run unit trusts - whose managers attempt to pick the best stocks - have carried an annual charge of between 1% and 1.5%. Platforms such as Hargreaves have taken a kickback, or rebate, of some of this charge, giving its customers the impression that they were getting access to the funds platform for nothing.

However, tracker funds - which eschew stock picking in favour of passively following a stock market index, such as the FTSE All Share, by buying all the shares listed on that index - have always thrown a spanner in the works. These funds carry a much lower annual management charge, typically around 0.5%, which leaves no room for the rebate to Hargreaves.

The new monthly platform fee will apply to all funds (mostly, but not exclusively, trackers) where Hargreaves currently does not receive its cut of the annual management charge from fund managers.

Dampier said Hargreaves was the first platform to respond to the FSA's policy and suggested explicit fees like this could become more prevalent on Vantage once the regulator's ban on commission and rebates took effect at the end of next year.

'If we're going to go to a pure fee charging business then there will be more of this,' he said.

Confusion over who is affected

Ben Lundie, head of Vantage development, sought to counter the impression that the cost of investing in tracker funds through Hargreaves, would go up.

Lundie said that Hargreaves already applied a 0.5% annual levy on top of the fund manager annual management charge on 130 funds where it did not receive a rebate. This was in line with the 0.5% annual charge appplied to ETFs and investment trusts and shares in its three main accounts (Sipp, ISA and fund account). These charges are capped at £45 in the ISA and £200 for the Sipp.

The only change, said Lundie, was that this additional annual charge on funds was being replaced by the monthly platform fee.

Sign in / register to view full article on one page

75 comments so far. Why not have your say?

Benjamin Fabi

Nov 21, 2011 at 10:54

'However, the service required to buy, hold and administer these funds remains the same as for other funds. Investors do not expect to compromise on service, functionality, administration and secure custody of their funds.’

So why doesn't HL charge all investors a flat fee to represent the service it provides and negotiate rebates with all external managers where it doesn't get a cut of the annual charge?

report this

Ian Hawkes

Nov 21, 2011 at 11:47

"Hargreaves Lansdown says the fee will apply to less than 3% of the funds on its Vantage service and that the remaining unit trusts (or open-ended investment companies) will remain free to hold."

They're only free in the same way as bank advice is free, i.e. paid for out of commission. Hargreaves Lansdown have largely fallen behind in the run-up to RDR, with other companies already offering full rebates of the initial and trail commission in exchange for a one-off fee. The HSBC trackers were one of their last good deals, now they're more expensive than their rivals for all but the smallest portfolios, and even then only where those portfolios are entirely made up of managed funds.

I suspect this move will lose them a lot of business that they could otherwise have kept by setting a single percentage based portfolio charge and accessing institutional units for their clients (i.e. no trail commission and no hidden platform commission either).

report this

Paul Stocks

Nov 21, 2011 at 12:41

I suspect there will be plenty more of this to come as the unbundling begins to result in people realising nothing is given for free - be it advice, ongoing service or, for that matter, the IT required to run fund platforms.

I suspect that those who have perpetuated the myth that such services are free are those most likely to feel the wrath of disgruntled clients!

report this

Anonymous 1 needed this 'off the record'

Nov 21, 2011 at 12:59

I can't understand why anyone would want to use Hargreaves. The range of funds available is so poor. Their range of Alernative funds (even those with a UCITS version) is virtually non-existent

report this

Anonymous 2 needed this 'off the record'

Nov 21, 2011 at 13:01

Maybe HL just want to "loose" unprofitable clients

report this


Nov 21, 2011 at 13:03

I'm glad I ditched Mr HL many (12?) years ago and have been with a Discount Broker that provides a better deal AND appreciates it's clients.

Stay clear of HL !

report this

The Pensioner

Nov 21, 2011 at 13:14

It was the sneakiness with which they've done it .. I happened to look at the 'At a glance' overview yesterday .... and there it was!!!

Is this the 'New Face' of Hargreaves Lansdown?

report this


Nov 21, 2011 at 13:40

The list provided doesn't actually cover all the funds that they now apply a new charge to.

RippedOff may be you'd like to say who you use instead

report this

Anonymous 3 needed this 'off the record'

Nov 21, 2011 at 13:54

Why people use H.L. is beyond comprehension. Discount brokers such as iii charge peanuts (£10 per trade for instance) and give a great service. Why would you wish to pay top rate commission to the likes of HL for little or no extra services. Financial service charges are becoming more transparent, as is the methods by which certain brokers have made fabulous profits over the years (IMO).

report this

Anonymous 4 needed this 'off the record'

Nov 21, 2011 at 14:14

Low cost tracker funds have proven time and time again to outperform managed funds. I have just set up for my children regular savings plans to help them save towards a property. I am now faced with paying £2 charges on each £50 invested. I only went with HL as I hoped that eventually they would invest funds of their own and would have a ready made platform for their activities. Will be writing to HL and no doubt will arrange something with charges of less than 4% WITH ANOTHER COMPANY. HL you are shooting youself in the foot.

report this


Nov 21, 2011 at 14:30

Well I am in the process of moving my SIPP from HL, the mgmt fees are too high and service is average at best. I have been with them for 15+ years and when they thought I was not clear as to the benefits of their SIPP, I made it clear that cost and service to me was the important factor (seems they think they can carry on as normal without anyone noticing the competition). What is that poor loyalty bonus all about as well???

report this

charlie 12

Nov 21, 2011 at 14:32

I might invest in some HL shares as it is now possibly going to become a more profitable company.

report this

Anonymous 1 needed this 'off the record'

Nov 21, 2011 at 14:38

@Charlie 12 - Either that or they are doing this because their business model is in trouble!!

report this

Anonymous 5 needed this 'off the record'

Nov 21, 2011 at 14:48

I bet Mr H and Mr L won't be that bothered at this forore - they've both made their (significant) millions and can probably walk away !

report this

Mystery X

Nov 21, 2011 at 14:55

I think this is a total rip off by H-L. They charge £200 per annum to run a SIPP, £45 to run an ISA PLUS all the other commission they receive from funds. I think everyone should look at Alliance Trust. I am contemplating moving all of my accounts + those of my wife and daughter away from H-L if this decision of charging £2 per month for index trackers is not reversed.

report this

Ana S

Nov 21, 2011 at 15:23

I find this outrageous and I am considering moving my account to another SIPP provider and have expressed this to Hargreaves Lansdown. They will not only lose my account but my husband's and my daughter's as well. At a time when we are having to cope with our assets being nearly wiped out by the recklessness of those in higher positions in financial intitutions to think very carefully about their continuous exploitation of customers who are always having to pay the price for their blunders!

report this


Nov 21, 2011 at 15:27

The justifiable course of action for HL would be to treat these index funds like they do ETFs and shares, namely to charge 0.5% pa capped at £45 for ISAs.

The fact that they haven't suggests to me that this is the way they will be going post-RDR for all of their funds.

report this

The Pensioner

Nov 21, 2011 at 15:37

SSJ - I think you've hit the nail on the head ... and I wonder if the other brokers will go the same way post-RDR ?

report this


Nov 21, 2011 at 15:55

You could always use your loyalty bonus rebates from your actively managed funds to pay for your tracker fee (if you must have a passive fund).Personally,I prefer actively managed funds and so this thread is a rather tedious issue.

report this


Nov 21, 2011 at 16:21

I must admit that my initial response was to feel outraged at the new platform fee and immediately set about looking for alternatives. What allowed me to get a better perspective on this, was when I reviewed my current portfolio properly and saw that my trackers would still cost me less (as a percentage) than anything else. My average TER is 1.33% without the platform fee and will be 1.41% after it's introduced (an increas of 0.08%) - though the percentage will lower as I invest more, as the platform fee is "capped" at £24. If you have more than £4,800 invested in a tracker and are paying their 0.5% fee, the cost will actually go down!

I do have a problem with my wifes ISA, as this has a very small investment in both the HSBC 100 and 250 funds, so will workout at a fee of 8.61%!!! I have no option but to rethink that investment and will have to move to another fund or transfer.

I'm sure that the management team at HL will review this new fee and come up with a better proposal e.g. a 0.5% fee, capped at £24 would seem like a fairer approach. They are going to lose smaller investors and fail to attract "beginners", if they don't.

report this


Nov 21, 2011 at 16:57

Why is it everyone thinks they deserve something for nothing? The one thing HL know how to do is arithmetic, so do you not think HL has thought through all these issues?

If you honestly believe you can save money elsewhere, you should move. I have quite a lot with HL, and would definitely move if I thought I was being ripped off, but I don't; yet.

I think The Pensioner has it right. I suspect HL is leading the way and all brokers will agree that this is the best way for them, thus delivering 'consumer consistency'. Let's have the discussion in a year's time and see if other brokers are doing anything radically different to HL.

report this


Nov 21, 2011 at 17:10

What nonsensical comments!

Ian Hawkes: I pay H-L a capped £200 for my SIPP. I have lots of investments (diversity) and only a small % of managed funds. If it was much larger it would still cost me £200

Anonymous 1: I transferred my SIPP from Standard Life where every thing seemed to incur a fee and I was limited to 8 or 10 investments TOTAL (I forget which). Now I have over 30 investments and the list of possible funds is vast.

Anonymous 3: H-L charge £5.95!

The courtesy, helpfulness and efficiency of H-L on the phone surpass any other British company I can think of in any field and I use their website every day without any difficulty.

MysteryX: I have followed your advice and Alliance Trust fees look pretty similar.

ShareCrazy: I think you are suffering from ‘the grass is greener’ syndrome

To Gavin Lumsden: Quoting £432 sounds expensive, but this man holds 18 trackers so not so surprising.

H-L provide a platform for investors who want to do the investing themselves. For this they are very convenient. Also their website has lots of balanced advice (the best sort!) My guess the reason that tracker funds do relatively well is that some fund managers are so bad. Surely the best approach is to look at H-L’s comprehensive list of managed funds and pick out a good one. The data is there. And if it starts doing badly move your money (for free!) to a better one. What could be easier!

PS my only relationship with H-L is client.

report this

Paul Wilkinson

Nov 21, 2011 at 17:15

I can't believe H-L....they don't appear to come we keep receiving mail about lower commission rates when in fact they have took me 4 years pleading for limit they are not interested in Alternative Investments in SIPPS for customers....I think my wife and I will be changing our Accounts together with friends before long..(after 12 yrs)

report this


Nov 21, 2011 at 17:51

I am pleased to read that I am not the only one wgo has complained to HL. Its bully boy tactics. They are forcing us from investing in trackers and moving into funds where they make more money. I had an assortment of trackers across a number of accounts and the fees would be ridiculous now. Today I have started consolidating and switching my trackers ,

i am really surprised at HL. Until now I have had a great respect for them.

report this

gggggg hjhjkl;'

Nov 21, 2011 at 18:18

ShareCrazy - I have my SIPP with HL £200 pa Maximum who have you moved to who charges less than 0.5% per annum per a/c????

report this


Nov 21, 2011 at 18:55

@gggggg hjjhkl

I have my Sipp with SIPPDEAL and their management fee is ZERO. Investments are company shares, investment trusts and ETFs.

Same investments with H_L would incur £200/year management fee.

Sippdeal only charge transaction fees for these type of investments which are cheaper than H_L as well. Over 5 years my saving is £1000 on annual fees alone.

report this


Nov 21, 2011 at 20:01

I doubt HL will be too worried by tracker holders leaving the platform, it's a commercial service and they can't make much if anything from providing all the IT etc that enables the service to work. Anyone wanting low cost trackers can get them for free (almost) by going direct to L&G etc, beats me why they expect others to subsidise them on the HL platform.

report this


Nov 21, 2011 at 20:11

Lundie of HL is being disingenuous - the platform fee does not count to the £200 SIPP cap. So most users of trackers will see a substantial increase in fees. The best bet (aside from moving) looks to be using the equivalent ETFs from HSBC. Accept the inevitable commision but buy in big chunks and keep the holding then provided you are already at the £200 cap there should be no further increase. I suppose we are starting to learn who pays for the barrage of letters and doubtful advice. Overall this really undermines trust in HL to play straight.

report this

Al Kemist

Nov 21, 2011 at 20:20

Thanks to George Benson for bring HL's platform charge to everyone's attention. I for one was ignorant. I have HSBC Trackers but have not been told about the changes by HL. Its this sort of high handed behaviour that puts people's back up, even if in the end the fee may possibly be justified.

report this


Nov 21, 2011 at 20:51

Many people find that Hargreaves are a by word for greed and double talk and I am not surprised at all by their action now.

For index funds it is much better to deal with the fund managers directly and for managed funds there are other better IFAs who give better rebates.

report this


Nov 21, 2011 at 21:53

Rustie, Mr HL WROTE to me in the same vein. This was the last straw. He actually did me a big favour.

PL if I said who I am now with I could be accused of touting. I will leave this tactic for the HL agents on this site cammoflaged but transparent.

As I have repeated for many months on this site STAY CLEAR OF HL.

report this


Nov 21, 2011 at 22:03

If you have no interest in fixed interest securities, say corporate bonds, then the likes of HL may not be particularly attractive.

On the other hand, if in low interest rate times, corporate bonds seem attractive then:

1. you want them in an OEIC not a unit trust where they have upfront loads and not in an investment trust where, ridiculously, they receive no ISA tax relief.

2. you don't want ISA charges to eat away at your interest distributions

And this is where HL scores

Also managed oiecs where you can get some specialist emphasis eg higher yielding stocks can be attractive.

So, in short it depends on the type of investing you wish to follow.

I do see the irony however that funds created to be cheap will now be expensive. They seem to pick on HSBC, L&G and M&G. Whilst I was considering absorbing my M&G ISA into HL, I am not any more!

report this


Nov 21, 2011 at 22:05

I am a fan of HL as a service, as having intelligent and knowledgeable human beings at the end of the phone line and at being efficient.

But they have made a mess of announcing this. They buried the announcement on p17 of Investment Times after a mention in the covering letter and explained it very poorly, so that I had to read and re-read it to to find out if it affected me - it doesn't (I think),

In the tabulation of individual funds and charges and loyalty bonuses the extra charge is shown as a footnote to the column headed 'Loyalty Bonus'. All-in-all a muddle and a suggestion of something to hide.

I don't expect to get all this service for nothing but it is a pity to see HL going down the route of the banks and utility companies in making their charges so complex and baffling that the consumer gives up trying to understand what is going on but suspects that they are being led up the garden path.

What has not been explained is the reason for the switch from a comprehensible 0.5% charge to this involved system . That is what is suggesting to so many people that there is more to the switch than meets the eye.

report this

George Benson

Nov 21, 2011 at 22:07

Wow, I didn't realise this would snowball like this! The power of the web...

Glad I may have helped/opened some eyes.

I've been reading and digesting all the responses all over the web (here, SME, Monevator etc) and I think Hl could do one thing -

'Protect the small investors'

To do this all they need to do is either wave the cost for people with fund values of less than £4000 or as suggested above reduce this to a percentage.

From 4k up the difference is about 0.3% to the TER which as can be seen by the people with large pots and calculators doesn't start to affect things as much.

Whether that would ever happen though, well we'll see....

Anyway, time to hide everything under the mattress and hold onto your gold as the world markets explode!

Take it easy.

report this


Nov 21, 2011 at 22:34

'To do this all they need to do is either wave the cost for people with fund values of less than £4000 . . . '

And punish anyone who has dared to do better?

report this

Anonymous 6 needed this 'off the record'

Nov 21, 2011 at 22:59

I am a small investor I just opened an ISA which contains 7 HSBC trackers I was about to add HSBC UK gilt index which HL keep well hidden, but 2% charges for a monthly £50 investment in a a gilt fund is a total joke! I am a novice investor but I'm not daft see you later HL. The rest of the family are joining me.

report this


Nov 21, 2011 at 23:07

Good bye HL I'm off to ii

report this


Nov 21, 2011 at 23:33

It does rather seem that the investors HL are going to lose are those with small portfolios of tracker funds who expect a free service! They are no doubt the same disgruntled brigade who last week held HL responsible for the poor performance of their own investment decisions. I feel sure that HL management know exactly the profile of client investor they are going to lose, and will sleep easy in their beds with the knowledge!

report this

Knowledgable insider

Nov 22, 2011 at 00:05 right HL will have thought it through and will probably be delighted to lose the small investors who are the ones who are moaning the most. In my experience they provide the most problems and expect everything for RDR they will have nowhere to go and can thank the FSA for it

report this

gggggg hjhjkl;'

Nov 22, 2011 at 01:25

John r - thanks for the information.

report this

Anonymous 7 needed this 'off the record'

Nov 22, 2011 at 08:04

HL does not have a monopoly on the market. If you are unhappy, vote with your feet. I can't stand all this whinging. A business can introduce whatever terms it likes and I can guarantee the decision makers have a better idea of what is good for them than the low level tracker holders!

report this

Jonas Cord

Nov 22, 2011 at 08:58

The above list of funds affected is not comprehensive. I have already identified two other funds where a £1/month fee will be levied, viz

Unicorn Mastertrust

IFDS Frontier MAP Balanced

So how does HL justify the fee on these funds ?

report this


Nov 22, 2011 at 09:07

It must be taking an inordinate amount of time for people to plough through the HL site to identify funds with charges. If you are serious about losing money, compare the cost of your time Vs what extra fees you will be charged by HL (and I would suggest many complaining here don't hold affected funds!). By the way, I am not an 'agent' of HL. I will pay a fair price for great customer service. Just think on everyone who believes other brokers can continue to provide services at no charge and why would they?

report this

Jonas Cord

Nov 22, 2011 at 09:14


I am not "ploughing through the HL site to identify funds with [platform] charges"

The two funds I mentioned above are both held in my Vantage ISA.

report this


Nov 22, 2011 at 09:25

What a discussion !!!!What a write up !!!!

Having paid sky high charges at varous other platforms over last 15 years

i changed to H-L 10 months ago for my ISA management ---Vow !!! the

charge was £ 200.00---way down from £3000.00 that Brewin Dolphin

charged me ----and now !!!! it is only £45.00-- H-L is good despite

aforementioned comments...

report this

Nigel gardiner

Nov 22, 2011 at 11:05

Of course Hargreaves will try and defend their actions just as Killik & Co defended their recent 1000% increase in the cost of paying from my pension once per annum. I also found out they were calculating incorrectly, weighed in their favour surprisingly and so they had to refund me.

They also charge me for two accounts as some of my money is protected rights, all the others I have contacted since dont. so if anyone thinks of moving to Killik from HL I suggest you do more groundwork.

I did contact HL once about depositing money, what a joke, talk about having your cake and eat it so I kept well clear of them. They receive all the interest and pay you the depositore some paltry percentage

Im moving from Killik in the new year when my deposit matures. I cant get out fast enough, never ever will I use them again. I consulted the Financial Ombudsman, nice people but a bit toothless really, awarded me £200 for Killiks lethargy in replying to me about the dreadfully poor and vague statements they sent me.

Tthe FSA is closing down isnt it? Anyway they dont deal directly with the individual and I guess they are busy so what real protection do we have with these companies doing a poor job....very little in reality

There are many more like HL and Killik and the Industry needs a radical shake up and disciplines enforced as they are not now. These companies dont offer value for money and seem focussed like many, in extracting as much as they possiblly can without giving in return.. whats new I suppose

report this

alec hargreaves

Nov 22, 2011 at 12:32

I dont know what Mr Gardiner does, or did for a living, but whatever it was no doubt he provided his services for little or no cost and if he didnt perhaps he could stop bleating about the low cost service he seems to enjoy. If your clever enough to invest your own money successfully? then surely its not rocket science finding a no thrills low cost servicer?

report this


Nov 22, 2011 at 12:48

So, if you don't like what HL offers, manage your own investments or transfer them elsewhere, and stop bleating on about how badly you are being treated.

Better to focus your efforts on the utilities companies. Now they really do rip-off EVERYONE (not just low volume users) for £00's seemingly without recourse.

report this

Ana S

Nov 22, 2011 at 14:14

I have a feeling that those defending HL and attacking the criticism made at the proposed charges have a personal relationship to the company.

report this

Anonymous 7 needed this 'off the record'

Nov 22, 2011 at 14:36

Ana, I suspect we are just realists in fact. No one expects a free service in any other walk of life. I suspect the furore around this owes much to the recent demonisation of the industry by the press among others.

report this


Nov 22, 2011 at 14:44

Ana, In my case I have no relationship other than that of client and very modest shareholder, and a satisfied one at that. However unlike the whingers on this thread I take credit for when I get my own decisions right, responsibility for when I get them wrong, and I don't expect a service provider to provide a service for nothing or at a loss.

report this

Colin Gregg

Nov 22, 2011 at 14:45


Well of course you'll be saving money with HL if you were paying £3000+ with B/Dolphin!!

However, the arguments lodged here still stand:

Why pay more than you have to, more than it actually costs a broker to handle your account and still make a profit?

I give you....

No annual management fees on ISAs or SIPPs

No annual charge for holding shares/investment trusts in an ISA or SIPP

Annual fee %age rebate on holding unit trusts/OIECS

£4.25 flat-rate dealing charge on shares (£5.75 as a non-member)

The usual FSA "protection" ( there's a misnomer, perhaps?!) on clients' money

This newly-launched brokerage service offers the usual execution-only service now associated with online dealing and is pledged to breaking the exorbitant fees structure that has grown up around our brokerage services, HL being a prime example.

Now of course, bwanakuba, you are welcome to go on thinking you've got a good deal with HL...

......but please, look a little wider!!

report this

Jonas Cord

Nov 22, 2011 at 14:55


Thanks, but this issue has already been dealt with (appears you have some difficulty differentiating between "bleating" and stating facts).

Having been a PI for over 25 years I also do not feel in need of your "advice" - neither investment nor utilities companies.

report this

Henry Barlow

Nov 22, 2011 at 15:20

Despite being a 'grumpy old man', I have been absolutely delighted with HL and their service.

If a charge I don't like arises for something, I will hopefully switch to something else that will restore my overall state of happiness.

Please stop moaning ... that's my job.

report this

Ana S

Nov 22, 2011 at 15:49

I would like to know why is it that the realists are the ones defending HL and the complainants are out of touch with reality. It would be more sensible and fairer if HL simply phased out such funds which it feels are unprofitable for new customers and let the old customers who hold index trackers to keep them and pay a flat rate. I have been helping my two daughters to begin building a pension for their future and it will make no sense for them to carry on with these funds under such circumstances, given the fact that they hold a very small kitty at present. We followed advice from members of our family who work in the industry and suggested what in the long term could be a good investment overall. Not anymore!

report this

Peter Dixon

Nov 22, 2011 at 18:04

Dear LouisV-W4 et al, please stop bleating about people you say are bleating.

If you don't want to read their opinions then use the mouse buttons to take you somewhere else.

report this

Kirsteen Mackenzie

Nov 23, 2011 at 09:25

No more to add really...I still challenge Citywire to investigate HL properly....Clear charging please and an improved cash interest rate.HL v new model advice...which is best? But hey, you boys love HL.

report this

Ian Hawkes

Nov 23, 2011 at 10:40


If you're paying the £200 capped, then presumably you aren't holding any of the affected investments. If you were, you might be more sympathetic to those affected (which I am not, in case anyone's wondering, I recently left HL for a cheaper broker), who are in some cases now facing total fees on trackers in excess of fees on the most expensive managed funds.

In any case, my point was not in relation to SIPP charging, which is another matter entirely, but rather the fact that HL are no longer the cheapest in any of the areas they were once market leading in. For managed funds, they continue to retain some of the trail commission in spite of numerous rivals rebating more (or even all) of that commission. For tracker funds, they now charge either 0.5% with a cap or £2 per month without a cap, seemingly arbitrarily, which has a huge effect on their use as part of a portfolio's core. For other investments (ETFs, shares, ITs, etc), they charge a percentage based holding fee where many other brokers charge solely on transactions (i.e. no charge while holding them).

In short, my comment was that they are no longer the cheapest supplier in any area, therefore they have lost their competitive edge. On top of that, the new charges aren't even consistent with their previous method of offsetting the cost of administration on trackers, which was to levy a percentage fee with a cap.

report this


Nov 24, 2011 at 09:11

@Colin Gregg !!

Sure, I shall take up your suggestion and look wider............

report this

Colin Gregg

Nov 24, 2011 at 19:41

@ bwanakuba...

Try - costings as mentioned above. I moved over in stages: Share A/c, ISAs, SIPP and have been delighted with the service so far.

However, be aware that a full range of trading ETFs etc is not yet in place - the company is in a rapid growth phase and developments are being added all the time.

report this


Nov 26, 2011 at 10:29

Ian Hawkes

I feel I should belatedly answer your comment to me, by apologising for putting your name right next to my heading of ‘nonsensical comments’. On re-reading I see that your comments were quite sensible but my reason for commenting in the first place was that the general tone of the various contributors was so different from my experience of H-L. I do not dispute that they are no longer as cheap as some but they have always been extraordinarily polite and helpful on phone and email even when I have asked some dumb questions and to one of the contributors who made certain allegations I have no vested interest in making my comments. (You’d think that by now H-L would have waived my fees, but no such luck.) When I first changed to H-L several years ago they were so much cheaper and more flexible and with a much better and more helpful web site than the large well known company a financial advisor had lodged me with that I was astonished to read such aggressive comments on this discussion.

You are right I don’t have any of the trackers; well, I have one Deutsche Bank 'db x-trackers’ ETF which doesn’t pay me anything, just goes up and down in value, and I don’t think I am being charged anything extra for that!

report this


Nov 26, 2011 at 10:50

To Ian:

If you found HL 'extraordinarily polite and helpful' then you won't have spoken with Peter Hargreaves. He's a bombastic, hectoring thuggish bully.

report this

Anonymous 5 needed this 'off the record'

Nov 26, 2011 at 20:03

To Rustie:

Perhaps that's why he has made so, so much money (aka commission).

Sadly, I have a stinking (and I mean stinking) rich brother-in-law - the adjectives you choose would equally apply to him.

Perhaps nice people don't get rich?

report this

Village Rascal

Nov 27, 2011 at 08:27

I can't say the HL platform would be my personal choice, but these sums are PEANUTS. Completely irrelevant. People who use these open architecture arrangements want flexibility to swap and change, to make investment decisions themselves. There is far far more to be lost by making poor decisions than any piffling charge. Again, I stress I wouldn't use HL, but really, get over yourselves.

report this


Nov 27, 2011 at 09:18

I have been with HL for over 3 years with SIPP and Vantage and have no complaints about them, platform is stable, easy to use and the service they provide is exactly as expected, charges are not as cheap as some of the bucket operators but you get what you pay for, they offer plenty of research and advice if that's what you are interested in and finally the ability to place limit orders valid for 30 days is a massive time saver!

Cheap does not always mean better, far safer to place your money with a solid UK based stock broker than some place which may not be around in 2 years.

report this


Nov 27, 2011 at 10:43

@ Red_Dragon

I agree with you fully; I have been with H-L last 10 months only.

H-L is excellent. It just dpends what you want from these platforms and

at what cost.

Why all this belley aching ??? You have a choice and you are free to

use whatever platform suits you. One does not have to like what i like.

report this


Nov 27, 2011 at 13:48

I get my 16 year old Toyota valued at £125 serviced by a mechanic in his spare time. When I buy(if) I buy a new/newish car valued in region of £12/15000 I will probably get it serviced by a 'proper' garage. In doing this I will have first considered cost/benefit. As previous comments have highlighted there is no free lunch.

report this


Nov 27, 2011 at 16:13

All credit to HL, following my complaint about these tracker charges I have received a very nice letter back explaining the rationale. An excellent piece of customer service.

I feel happier now and am adjusting the tracker part of my portfolio so it makes sense in the context of the new fees. i.e. No tracker fund holding will have less than £5K except Emerging Markets where it will be £2.5K - so problem solved.

However, I hope they realise that they made a complete mess of this announcement and need to be more careful in the future.

Time to move on.

report this


Nov 27, 2011 at 20:39

Here we have the most profitable company on the stock market, whose meteoric rise over the last few years has put them into the FTSE100, telling us they need to charge £24 per year to hold a few index trackers...Ha, ha, ha !

report this


Nov 27, 2011 at 21:14

Why the heck are people going to HL to be fleeced when they can hold index trackers at the issuing company for nothing?

I hold all my stocks and shares with a stock broker on his platform with all the trading facilities, limit orders etc for nothing. An IFA holds my UT and OEIC and rebates all his initial and annual commision, for a one off £25 fee. I do not know how he does it. I am perfectly satisfied with both of them and have no wish at all to make HL any richer than he already is.

Incidentally, I get all the HL so called research reports in my email and I find them of completely one sided and of very low standard, nothing more than sales bulletins masquerading a research. If you have any doubts on this, just look up the performance of their own funds. Second rate.

report this


Nov 27, 2011 at 22:32

@ Franco !!!

I agree to disagree with you.

H-L is good. That is in my view.

Of course! You are entitled to your views ......

report this


Nov 28, 2011 at 09:52

This discussion has been useful to see what platforms or brokers people use and the experience/costs. It is about time HL and others like Killik made it clear how much they receive from fund managers. In addition all transactional/dealing costs should be made clearly available. One can then decide if they wish to pay more for what may be a better service.

HL charging £1-2pm is probably the beginning for them and many others. Fund manager kickbacks will stop in a year or so and these firms who heavily relied on this commission will have to start charging the client. The worst of all will be those firms who got the kickback but did nothing for it, i.e. charged a dealing fee to buy the fund (maybe an ongoing admin fee as well) and then gave no ongoing service. How would these firms suddenly justify charging a client up to 0.75% per annum ?

It will be interesting to see in the run up to RDR the changes to come.

report this

Mystery X

Nov 28, 2011 at 12:36

Very interesting comments but I have great sympathy and agreement with Ana S.

Has anybody thought of putting their next ISA with Alliance Trust or any other provider and purchase all their Trackers in that ISA. I am sure no one is going to be as outrageous as HL has been. Alliance Trust has a complete portfolio of Vanguard trackers - the cheapest. When I was setting up my SIPP I opened an account at Alliance but in the end opted for HL. I am now going to activate my AL account.

report this

william parry

Dec 01, 2011 at 11:00

we should never forget that H/L are first and foremost a sales organisation.

"putting our customers first" is balony! H/L has secumed to pure greed and everything they print is solely in the interests of H/L.-- including the 'wealth

150 funds' many of which provide a rake-off for the company!

report this

Richard Levett

Mar 31, 2012 at 03:54

I just checked I never realised I was being charged! I was never informed and only realised when I googled "platform fees" to find out as nothing on HL website that I could find. What a bunch of B*******!

I know they never made money from my SIPP, so a fee I expected one day but not hidden away and never informed. And with my rebate pension as well although that will soon merge it's costing me a lot more than other platforms. So will look to move. I reckon they have tried hiding it on purpose so that investors would never realise

The government need to regulate the finance industry properly if people are to have confidence to save for retirement without being ripped off.

report this

leave a comment

Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.

News sponsored by:

The Citywire Guide to Investment Trusts

In this guide to investment trusts, produced in association with Aberdeen Asset Management, we spoke to many of the leading experts in the field to find out more.

Watch Now

More about this:

Look up the funds

  • HSBC FTSE All Share Index Inc
    Register or Sign in to receive email alerts for items in your favourites whenever we write about them
  • Henderson UK Index Ret Acc
    Register or Sign in to receive email alerts for items in your favourites whenever we write about them
  • HSBC American Index Inc
    Register or Sign in to receive email alerts for items in your favourites whenever we write about them
  • HSBC European Index Inc
    Register or Sign in to receive email alerts for items in your favourites whenever we write about them
  • HSBC FTSE 100 Index Acc
    Register or Sign in to receive email alerts for items in your favourites whenever we write about them
  • HSBC FTSE 250 Index Inc
    Register or Sign in to receive email alerts for items in your favourites whenever we write about them
  • HSBC Japan Index Inc
    Register or Sign in to receive email alerts for items in your favourites whenever we write about them
  • HSBC Pacific Index Inc
    Register or Sign in to receive email alerts for items in your favourites whenever we write about them
  • Legal & General All Stocks Gilt Index Trust Inc
    Register or Sign in to receive email alerts for items in your favourites whenever we write about them
  • Legal & General European Index Trust I Acc
    Register or Sign in to receive email alerts for items in your favourites whenever we write about them
  • Legal & General Global Emerging Mkts Index I Acc
    Register or Sign in to receive email alerts for items in your favourites whenever we write about them
  • Legal & General International Index I Acc
    Register or Sign in to receive email alerts for items in your favourites whenever we write about them
  • Legal & General Japan Index Trust I Acc
    Register or Sign in to receive email alerts for items in your favourites whenever we write about them
  • Legal & General Pacific Index Trust I Acc
    Register or Sign in to receive email alerts for items in your favourites whenever we write about them
  • Legal & General UK 100 Index Trust E Acc
    Register or Sign in to receive email alerts for items in your favourites whenever we write about them
  • Legal & General UK Index Trust I Acc
    Register or Sign in to receive email alerts for items in your favourites whenever we write about them
  • Legal & General US Index Trust I Acc
    Register or Sign in to receive email alerts for items in your favourites whenever we write about them
  • M&G European Index Tracker (ex UK) A Euro Acc
    Register or Sign in to receive email alerts for items in your favourites whenever we write about them
  • M&G Index Tracker A Inc
    Register or Sign in to receive email alerts for items in your favourites whenever we write about them
  • HSBC Gilt & Fixed Interest Inc
    Register or Sign in to receive email alerts for items in your favourites whenever we write about them
  • IFDS Brown Shipley Sterling Bond A Inc
    Register or Sign in to receive email alerts for items in your favourites whenever we write about them
  • Legal & General Fixed Interest Trust R Inc
    Register or Sign in to receive email alerts for items in your favourites whenever we write about them
  • Legal & General Managed Income Trust R Inc
    Register or Sign in to receive email alerts for items in your favourites whenever we write about them
  • M&G Gilt & Fixed Interest Income A Inc
    Register or Sign in to receive email alerts for items in your favourites whenever we write about them
  • M&G Index-Linked Bond A Inc
    Register or Sign in to receive email alerts for items in your favourites whenever we write about them
  • Royal London Index Linked A
    Register or Sign in to receive email alerts for items in your favourites whenever we write about them
  • Templeton Global Total Return Bond A Inc
    Register or Sign in to receive email alerts for items in your favourites whenever we write about them

Look up the shares

  • Hargreaves Lansdown PLC (HRGV.L)
    Register or Sign in to receive email alerts for items in your favourites whenever we write about them

More from us

What others are saying


Today's articles

Tools from Citywire Money

From the Forums

+ Start a new discussion

Weekly email from The Lolly

Get simple, easy ways to make more from your money. Just enter your email address below

An error occured while subscribing your email. Please try again later.

Thank you for registering for your weekly newsletter from The Lolly.

Keep an eye out for us in your inbox, and please add to your safe senders list so we don't get junked.

Sorry, this link is not
quite ready yet