Citywire printed articles sponsored by:
View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/money/article/a561098
Hedge fund fined £7.2m for Punch Taverns insider dealing
A hedge fund and its boss have been fined £7.2 million for insider dealing on Punch Tavern (PUB.L) shares.
Markets
A hedge fund owner and his fund have been fined £7.2 million between them by the City watchdog for insider dealing on Punch Taverns shares.
David Einhorn and his hedge fund Greenlight Capital were fined for engaging in market abuse. Einhorn was privy to a conversation with a corporate broker on 9 June 2009 in which he found out that Punch Taverns (PUB.L), which has around 5,000 pubs across the UK, was at an advanced stage of significant equity fundraising – amounting to inside information.
The Financial Services Authority (FSA) said that in just ‘a matter of minutes’ after the call Einhorn had given the instruction to sell all of Greenlight’s holding in Punch, which amounted to 13.3% and held in underlying funds managed by Greenlight.
Over the next four days Greenlight reduced its holding from 13.3% to 8.89% and on 15 June 2009 Punch announced a fundraising of £375 million and shares in the company fell 29.9%. The sale of Greenlight’s Punch shares meant the hedge fund saved losses of around £5.8 million.
The FSA accepted that Einhorn’s trading was not deliberate as he did not believe he was privy to inside information, however the regulator said it expected investment professionals to handle information carefully.
Tracey McDermott, acting director of enforcement and financial crime at the FSA, said: ‘Einhorn is an experienced professional with a high profile in the industry. We expect someone in his position to be able to identify inside information when he receives it and to act appropriately.
‘His failure to do so is a serious breach of the expected standards of market conduct.’
Einhorn was fined £3,638,000 and Greenlight was fined £3,650,795.
Tools from Citywire Money
More about this:
More from us
- Two insurers fined £2.17 million for tampering with complaint files
- HSBC hit with record fine for mis-selling to the elderly
- Coutts fined £6.3 million for mis-selling AIG bond
- Credit Suisse fined £6m for structured product failings
- Mortgage fraudster's appeal backfires as fine increased
Look up the shares
Archive
Today's articles
- UK inflation drops sharply to 3%
- Eurobond hopes fuel more FTSE gains
- Henderson Asian Growth: 1bn new consumers can't be wrong
- Bank of England forced to accept credit crunch probe
- PPI becomes most complained about product ever
- Investment trusts: 2 resilient funds for troubled Europe
- The Expert View: Kingfisher, ITV and BTG
- Should financial firms live by these golden rules?





6 comments so far. Why not have your say?
Edmond Jackson
Jan 25, 2012 at 17:41
"He did not believe he was privy to inside information."
You have to laugh, most especially at the FSA.
report thisKeith Snell
Jan 25, 2012 at 18:19
Unfortunatly whilst the appaling lack of regulation dished out by the FSA is certainly risible I do not believe they will all be made redundant for failure to regulate with due diligence as no one in Government seems to care. As ever with government regulators they cast a great deal more than they are worth.
report thisAlasdair Lawrance
Jan 25, 2012 at 19:14
"....Einhom's trading was not deliberate as he did not believe he was privy to inside information"
Please do not treat me like a child - I and many others I suspect, did not come down with the last shower!
report thisChooglin'
Jan 26, 2012 at 02:46
With the amount of money the hedge fund makes, the fine means nothing to them, they'll just have a good laugh about it down at the club. Throw them in prison instead and set an example.
report thisjoe stalin
Jan 26, 2012 at 08:49
it is absolutely pathetic! I would venture most hedge funds look to get an "inside "edge at some ;point. They pay doctors in resarch programmes and lobby politicians etc. The fines imposed should be much much bigger and should coincide with a trading ban and or prison just like the small guy might face.
report thisEdmond Jackson
Jan 26, 2012 at 10:16
It would be interesting to know what is the FSA's test between insider trading that proceeds to a prosecution, versus this "slap of the wrists" under market abuse.
What is the difference between say, a secretary leaking documents of a planned takeover, a trader acquires and acts to buy, versus a trader hearing from a broker that a rights issue is proceeding - and not surprisingly is motivated to sell?
It amounts to one law for the capitalist elite, and another for everyone else.
The FSA being part of the problem.
report thisleave a comment
Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.