Citywire for Financial Professionals
Stay connected:

Citywire printed articles sponsored by:


View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/money/article/a473525

Homeowners can't move house because they can't get a mortgage

Even if your mortgage is portable and you don’t want to increase your loan, many people will find they are unable to transfer their existing borrowing to a new property.

Difficulties obtaining a mortgage mean that there is huge pent up demand from borrowers wanting to move house.

Even if your mortgage is portable and you don’t want to increase your home loan – and most will need to borrow more – many homebuyers will find they are unable to transfer their existing borrowing to a new property. 

People need to move house

This is becoming a big problem, as a significant proportion of homeowners need to move house. Research from Clydesdale & Yorkshire Banks shows that in the South East some 40% of homebuyers say they are planning to move. And for many families moving is not optional, with 14% needing to relocate and 10% expanding their family.

Much tougher lending criteria from the banks and building societies are to blame, with minimum deposits of 25% the norm along with a squeaky clean credit history.

The result is that home loans are running at less than half their average over the ten years before the credit crunch hit in 2007. Figures from the Council of Mortgage Lenders show that there were 529,300 loans advanced for house purchase in 2010 compared with an average of well over one million a year from 1997 to 2007.

Borrowers the lenders don’t like

There are a number of reasons why homeowners will have difficulty in getting a mortgage – even if they simply want to switch existing borrowing to a new property.

In most instances you will have to go through a full credit check again, as well as proof of income using much tougher affordability tests. 

If, for example, you and your partner originally raised the mortgage on joint incomes and you have since started a family and now have only one income, you may find that the lender is not prepared to even offer you the same mortgage that you have already – even if you have never been in arrears, have a perfect credit track record and are in secure employment. 

They take the view that you can no longer afford the loan now that the family income is lower and costs, as a result of having children, are higher.

David Hollingworth, of mortgage broker London & Country, said: ‘We have always said, that while lenders say loans are portable, don’t just assume that you can switch it to a new property. People are finding that they are locked into their current deal and cannot move.’

Hollingworth also cites a reduction in maximum age for older borrowers and withdrawal of interest-only loans by many lenders as reasons why lenders won’t transfer a mortgage to a new property.

There are also much tougher requirements for the self employed who must now produce two or three years audited accounts. And self-cert mortgages no longer exist.

Sign in / register to view full article on one page

7 comments so far. Why not have your say?

Chris

Feb 24, 2011 at 08:34

Shock, horror. People only able to borrow what they might actually be able to pay back. As we shut the stable door I see a horse in the far far distance.

report this

LANDLORD X

Feb 24, 2011 at 11:00

Great opportunity for landlords

If you can't sell or buy, rent instead

Renting is the new black

report this

Jonathan

Feb 24, 2011 at 18:48

The banks do need to sort something out so people in negative equity can take up to the same negative equity with them into a new house. The affordability rules should be the same as when they took out the original mortgage, with the exception of self-certified where proof of income should now be provided. This sort of transaction is probably open to more abuse than standard mortgages but it should the banks job to assess and monitor this.

report this

col lord

Feb 24, 2011 at 19:25

God help our young people... So called free market economy, strangled by more and more rules made by highly paid people who dont have to worry about having a house to live in!

Has this country and our people ever been less free...

report this

Anonymous 1 needed this 'off the record'

Feb 24, 2011 at 20:13

The problem is banks don't want to lend on property because many of them got badly burnt. Fair enough there have been irresponsible borrowers but at the same time their has been responsible borrowers.

The problem now is that the banks are too scared to lend even to responsible borrowers ! They may as well shut their doors for 5 years and save the emploment costs and pay back the government.

What a shambles !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

report this

roger

Feb 25, 2011 at 14:38

The Banks have no money to lend, therefore they are just cherry picking the applications. I agree with Lorna, many folk are now trapped which in turn will help stabilize the housing market.

report this

Jonathan

Feb 25, 2011 at 14:59

@Roger

Banks have plenty to lend but they don't want to lend to people who will be in negative equity. If the banks suspect house prices might fall 20% to 30% in the next 2 years it would be idiotic to lend to people with less than 20% deposit as they would be in negative equity in the near future so the bank would be putting their money at risk.

report this

leave a comment

Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.

Sorry, this link is not
quite ready yet