Citywire for Financial Professionals
Stay connected:

View the article online at

Investor complaints mount against Beaufort Securities

Collapsed City broker and investment manager facing US fraud charges has racked up 600 complaints at the Financial Ombudsman Service.

Investor complaints mount against Beaufort Securities

Collapsed City stockbroker and investment manager Beaufort Securities has racked up 600 complaints at the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS).

Last week Beaufort Securities, which held £850 million of client assets at the time, fell into administration. It came after the United States Department of Justice published an indictment in which Beaufort Securities and other companies and individuals were charged in relation to 'securities fraud and money laundering violations.’

The indictment revealed how an FBI agent worked undercover at Beaufort Securities to investigate a ‘pump and dump’ share scheme. The defendants also proposed the FBI agent could purchase a painting by Pablo Picasso as part of a money laundering scheme. 

The FOS has now revealed it has received around 600 complaints about Beaufort Securities. These complaints are understood to be completely separate to the FBI investigation. 

In one FOS decision published last March, which was upheld against Beaufort Securities, a complainant lost £71,000 in Alternative Investment Market-listed investments.

As Beaufort has now been declared insolvent these 600 FOS complaints may be later passed to the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS). When asked, a spokesman from the FOS said: ‘We still have the complaints at present’.

In a separate statement the FSCS said it was working with the firm’s administrators, PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) to ‘to understand what this [the firm’s collapse] might mean for these firms’ customers’.

The FSCS has not yet declared Beaufort in default. If it did, investors would need to claim via the compensation scheme rather than the FOS and any successful claims would result in payouts.

Financial advisers face claims

Financial advisers are also facing claims over their use of Beaufort Securities as a discretionary fund manager for their clients.

Last October Citywire's New Model Adviser® revealed Beaufort Securities had written to investors encouraging them to claim against their financial advisers over its own investment products.

The firm directed clients to use claims firm Legal Force to see if they had grounds for a compensation claim against their adviser for recommending they invest in Beaufort Securities.

Simon Helliwell, director of Legal Force, said he currently had around 200 complaints being made to the FOS and FSCS relating to six financial advice firms which were using Beaufort. Helliwell said these claims concerned the suitability of investments clients were placed in.

One of these advice firms is now-collapsed Welsh firm Grosvenor Butterworth which closed last November following a voluntary variation of permissions at the behest of the FCA.

Administration challenges

Last week administrators PwC said it had ring-fenced £50 million in client money accounts and frozen £850 million in client assets.

PwC added that with client assets ‘there are a number of open positions and transactions which need to be resolved and concluded. This may impact the total once a final reconciliation takes place’.

Nigel Rackham, joint administrator of Beaufort Securities said ‘this is a significant and complicated insolvency’ and as there were very little available funds at the firm the ‘costs of returning client money and client assets will in all likelihood be deducted from clients' recoveries’.

1 comment so far. Why not have your say?


May 09, 2018 at 23:29

How could they be allowed to carry on, with that level of complaints against them? If they had been suspended or wound up a year ago, perhaps we would have avoided the situation we now face, of having our ringfenced funds used to pay for the administrators! Instead, we find that in fact THERE IS NO PROTECTION FOR INVESTORS. We are treated like creditors, by the administrators who have no incentive at all to complete the job cost-effectively. Indeed if they string it out long enough, or were a bigger firm, the admins (PwC) could get their hands on almost all the investors' assets. It is a complete disgrace. As a result, we stand to lose half our life savings and the proceeds of the sale of our company last year. Unbelievable.

report this

leave a comment

Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.

News sponsored by:

The Citywire Guide to Investment Trusts

In this guide to investment trusts, produced in association with Aberdeen Asset Management, we spoke to many of the leading experts in the field to find out more.

Watch Now

Today's articles

Tools from Citywire Money

From the Forums

+ Start a new discussion

Weekly email from The Lolly

Get simple, easy ways to make more from your money. Just enter your email address below

An error occured while subscribing your email. Please try again later.

Thank you for registering for your weekly newsletter from The Lolly.

Keep an eye out for us in your inbox, and please add to your safe senders list so we don't get junked.

Sorry, this link is not
quite ready yet