View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/money/article/a881452
Investors granted appeal as Lloyds redeems bonds
Lloyds is going ahead with the redemption of its bonds despite investors being granted a Supreme Court appeal.
Lloyds bondholders have been granted a Supreme Court appeal but it could be too little too late as the bank is going ahead with the redemption.
In a last minute announcement, the Supreme Court has granted ‘enhanced capital notes’ (ECNs) investors the chance to appeal the redemption of their investments, despite Lloyds attempting to block a further court case.
However, the right to appeal has come too late for the thousands of bondholders who will see their bonds, some of which paid generous yields of up to 11%, redeemed from today.
Mark Taber, a fixed income expert who has been helping bondholders, said the investors are willing to fight the bank in the Supreme Court but the best they can hope for it compensation from Lloyds, which issued the ECNs as part of a bank rescue plan at the height of the financial crisis.
Taber said the compensation plan was unfair as investors – many of who are retirees – want income, not compensation.
‘[If they lose] Lloyds has said they’re going to compensate everyone,’ he said. ‘It is so unfair on people; how will [Lloyds] make sure everyone automatically gets compensation rather than have to fight for it?
‘How much will the compensation be? Who will determine it? Who will look into this? And will the bondholders have to go to court to get it?’
Taber added that some bondholders faced ‘huge tax bills’ due to the redemption and that if they were compensated after a Supreme Court win they would still be at a tax disadvantage because ‘if they get compensation it will not automatically go into their ISA or Sipp’.
Although the Supreme Court appeal will be expedited to speed up the process, the court battle is the latest in a long-running saga that has seen bondholders dragged through the High Court and Court of Appeal.
The High Court initially ruled in bondholders’ favour but the decision was over-turned by the Court of Appeal as Lloyds insisted it had ‘made a mistake’ in its contract with investors and should be entitled to redeem the bonds.
When the Court of Appeal handed down its verdict it said the bondholders would not be able to appeal in the Supreme Court meaning trustees had to gain permission from the Supreme Court for the hearing to take place.
Lloyds tried to block the application stating ‘the proposed appeal does not raise any arguable point of law of general public importance which ought to be considered by the Supreme Court at this time’ and that the ‘decision has no wider significance to anyone other than the issuers and holders of ECNs’.
Taber criticised Lloyds for continuing its fight against bondholders, believing it would be more cost-effective to pay the bond income than pay legal fees.
‘There is no reason or logic behind this,’ he said. ‘It is going to cost a whole lot more than to leave the bonds running and will be an almighty headache [for Lloyds] – they’re just annoying people even more.’
Lloyds confirmed it would go ahead with the redemption.
Background to the battle
The ECNs started life as permanent interest bearing shares (Pibs), a type of bond that were converted by the bank in 2009 when it urgently needed to boost its regulatory capital.
However, the problem arose over whether a ‘capital disqualification event’ (CDE) occurred that would allow the bank to buy back the bonds, which pay interest rates of up to 11% and are an expensive form of debt for Lloyds to service.
Lloyds argued that a CDE occurred last year when the Prudential Regulatory Authority (PRA) stress-tested the bank to see if it could withstand another crash but it did not include the ECNs as part of its reserves.
The High Court then ruled a CDE had not taken place as the regulator could include the bonds in a future stress test. Lloyds argued that it had made a mistake and had meant to insert a clause for a CDE into its contract that would have been triggered if regulators raised the amount of ‘tier one’ capital it had to set aside to above 5%.
At the time the Pibs were converted to ECNs the requirement was for 4% of capital, meaning the 5% trigger would have been easily reached as regulators forced banks to strengthen their balance sheets in response to the credit crunch.
Bondholders argued they had not been told about the 4% figure and that if they had, they would not have switched their Pibs to ECNs.
News sponsored by:
From Brazil and Mexico, to Vietnam and Nigeria, the rapidly developing economies of Latin American and frontier markets, which are some of the smaller, less developed economies in the world, provides investors with a wealth of potential opportunities. Discover why BlackRock's investment trust range is well placed to help you make more of these exciting regions.
In this guide to investment trusts, produced in association with Aberdeen Asset Management, we spoke to many of the leading experts in the field to find out more.
More about this:
More from us
- Hope for Lloyds bondholders as buyback postponed
- Treasury apologises for Lloyds bond blunder
- Lloyds bondholders turn to regulator as redemption looms
- Osborne delays Lloyds share sale after market slump
- Lloyds blocks investors' court appeal in bond battle
- FCA slated for 'standing by' in Lloyds bond battle
- Lloyds bondholders forced to sell as bank wins appeal
Tools from Citywire Money
From the Forums
Weekly email from The Lolly
Get simple, easy ways to make more from your money. Just enter your email address below
An error occured while subscribing your email. Please try again later.
Thank you for registering for your weekly newsletter from The Lolly.
Keep an eye out for us in your inbox, and please add email@example.com to your safe senders list so we don't get junked.
by Daniel Grote on Sep 23, 2016 at 17:01