Citywire for Financial Professionals
Stay connected:

View the article online at

Is a ‘tax on age’ the best way to help young voters?

Chancellor Philip Hammond is looking at Budget measures to help the young. Are cuts in stamp duty and pension tax relief the best way to do it?

Is a ‘tax on age’ the best way to help young voters?

Chancellor Philip Hammond is going all out in his campaign to get young people onside with a stamp duty cut for first-time buyers being considered for next month’s Budget.

Hammond is believed to be eyeing a cut in stamp duty for those trying to get on to the property ladder in a bid to restore ‘intergenerational fairness’, according to the London Evening Standard.

Currently, homebuyers have to stump up 2% on property between £125,000 and £250,000, rising to a marginal rate of 5% over £250,0001, then 10% over £925,001, and 12% after £1.5 million.

Those trying to buying a home in London would see the biggest benefit as the average home in the capital rises to £428,546, this means the average stamp duty bill is now a huge £11,427. Even the £2,500 due on a £250,000 property is a large chunk of money considering how difficult it is to scrape a deposit together these days.

While a stamp duty cut would ease the pressure on first-time buyers somewhat, there is a real concern property prices will rise and absorb the saving, meaning they will be no better off. The only way to provide young people with affordable homes is not to tinker around the edges of tax but to build more homes and push prices down.

The mooted stamp duty cut follows reports that Hammond also wants to cut national insurance for young workers paid through a cut to pension tax relief for older workers.

Tax relief, in which the government tops up individual pension contributions to encourage saving, has long been viewed by politicians as a source of potential funding. Tom Selby, senior analyst at investment broker AJ Bell, said the most obvious way for the pension plan to be put in place would be to scrap higher rate relief from a certain age.

Selby modelled two scenarios for cutting higher rate relief for those earning over £45,000: getting rid of the generous relief at age 40 and then at age 50.

A 40-year-old putting £500 a month into a pension – which has investment growth of 4% a year after charges – would have missed out on reliefs of £64,968 by the time they hit 65. A 50-year-old saving the same amount with the same growth rate up to age 65 would miss out on £31,237 in relief.

Although younger people may not have much sympathy with older workers able to save £500 per month, Selby said removing pension tax relief for high earning older employees was effectively a ‘tax on age’.

‘Removing higher rate tax relief is anything but simple when you factor in occupational and defined benefit pensions and how do you justify cutting pensions tax relief for a doctor earning £60,000 in order to provide a tax boost for a City worker earning £500,000?,’ he said.

Gary Smith, a chartered financial planner at Tilney, said implementing a radical change to the pension tax system was difficult to do, as proved by then chancellor George Osborne’s failed attempt in 2014.

He said the key issue was the £50 billion-plus cost of pension tax relief, 70% of which goes to higher rate and additional rate taxpayers.

‘The cost to the Exchequer is unsustainable and will need to be addressed,’ he said. ‘The big question is how you address the tax relief issue.

‘I can only assume that if Hammond does opt to reduce tax relief for older savers to reduce NI for young people, then this would be by reducing the annual allowance – currently £40,000 – for those above a certain age to, for example, £20,000.’

This way older people would be further restricted in the amount of money they can place into a pension and in turn reduce the amount of tax relief available to them.

However, Smith pointed out that young people – at the beginning of their careers and earnings potential – just cannot afford to save much into pensions and may need to save in later years when house purchases and student loans are out of the way.

By cutting relief for older workers, today’s young people could see themselves being restricted from saving into a pension.

‘I do feel that changes to the pension tax relief system are inevitable at some point, but there are other ways to achieve this without penalising older savings,’ said Smith. ‘The introduction of a flat rate of relief for all at 25% or 30% would provide an additional boost to contributions for basic rate taxpayers.’


6 comments so far. Why not have your say?

Law Man

Oct 18, 2017 at 18:33

Removal of HR tax relief or restriction of annual contribution limit for persons aged over 50:

This is unfair to many - we have lower incomes in our 20s, and until age 40/50 have to find money to pay for mortgage repayments, children, etc.

In our 50s we have a surplus to put into a pension

This applies particularly to those of us who are, or were,self employed.

report this


Oct 18, 2017 at 18:40

Allow tax relief at 30% regardless of age or income.

report this


Oct 18, 2017 at 19:38

I will not vote for Tories, if there is any type of tax retire people and pensions.

I stopped voting Labor when they taxed dividends.

report this

Roger Savage

Oct 18, 2017 at 21:22

Billions in state subsidies to house builders (who are reporting record profits) in the form of Help to Buy and considering stamp duty cuts - there's only one reason for this - rewarding the people you've been paid to serve. Clue - it isn't the taxpayer...

report this


Oct 18, 2017 at 21:28

The simple fact is that those who are comfortably off or wealthy will save towards their pensions whether the relief is 20%,30%,40% or 45% because it makes sense to do so. Therefore I think it is socially fair to equalise the tax relief at 20% this being the basic rate of income tax and the rate at which the highest proportion of taxpayers pay tax. We should also note the very generous tax concessions provided to the better off in terms of ISAs, VCTs etc. Yes, I know that they are available to all adults, but only the better off have the financial resources to take advantage of them.

report this

Mr J

Oct 20, 2017 at 00:48

Sonic, I might agree with you were it not for the fact that many 40% tax payers are not actually wealthy and struggle to live an ordinary life. Over the years governments have systematically and massively increased the numbers of people paying 40% income tax. It is no longer a tax rate for the rich it is tax rate for the ordinary person - the teacher, the shop manager, the junior accountant - indeed almost anyone that is actually a company employee and has progressed from inexperienced youngster to having a recognizable skill set be it an HR officer, an engineer, or whatever. I can assure you that many families will have one earner in a middling job paying 40% tax and the other earner in part time or lower paid work.

You need to remember this money belongs to the people that earned it. Tax relief is not not not a gift from the government. It is simply people being able to keep their own money to put in a pension.

By the way There is a massive level of tax avoidance by the self employed with people setting up shell companies, paying themselves in untaxed dividends, falsely paying family members through the company etc etc.

These days all governments have become deceivers seeking sneaky back door ways of raising tax. It is so so dishonest. I really wish we could go back to the simple truthful approach - if more money is needed put a couple of pence on income tax.All this hypothecating is nonsense. Doctors must pay for their own education but Alan sugar doesn't have to contribute to this even though he will benefit from their skills when they are fixing his hip or saving his life.

Taxes on business have been made so low and attractive that anyone with the opportunity to do it sets up as a company instead of an employee.

report this

leave a comment

Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.

News sponsored by:

The Citywire Guide to Investment Trusts

In this guide to investment trusts, produced in association with Aberdeen Asset Management, we spoke to many of the leading experts in the field to find out more.

Watch Now

Today's articles

Tools from Citywire Money

From the Forums

+ Start a new discussion

Weekly email from The Lolly

Get simple, easy ways to make more from your money. Just enter your email address below

An error occured while subscribing your email. Please try again later.

Thank you for registering for your weekly newsletter from The Lolly.

Keep an eye out for us in your inbox, and please add to your safe senders list so we don't get junked.


The Accumulator: FTSE see-saws on trade war fears

by Michelle McGagh on Jun 22, 2018 at 14:57

Sorry, this link is not
quite ready yet