Citywire for Financial Professionals
Share this page:
Stay connected:

Citywire printed articles sponsored by:

View the article online at

Mortgages: borrowers hit by double whammy of restrictions

Getting a mortgage has been made tougher by a gold-plating of affordability rules.


by Michelle McGagh on Aug 01, 2014 at 12:08

Mortgages: borrowers hit by double whammy of restrictions

Borrowers are being hit by a double whammy of hurdles as both the government and the regulator attempt to close down on risky mortgage lending.

In the space of three months borrowers have seen the mortgage rules tighten significantly. At the end of April the regulator introduced the ‘mortgage market review’ (MMR) which toughened up the affordability rules around mortgage lending and forced banks and building societies to ask more in-depth questions about borrowers’ spending habits.

This was followed in July by an announcement that chancellor George Osborne had given the Bank of England new powers to cap the loan-to-income ratios on new mortgage lending, meaning banks will have less scope to lend to those on smaller incomes.

It could be argued that the introduction of these stricter rules has managed to rein in an overheating property market, with growth in the London area slowing to just 0.1% in June after surging 16.4% over the last 12 months, while prices in the rest of the country have been flat since May, according to Land Registry data.

However, for those still trying to get a foot on the property ladder or even move home, the changes mean they have to navigate two lending obstacles.

Ticking the boxes

David Hollingworth of independent mortgage broker London & Country said the affordability test brought in by the MMR was the ‘primary test’ and the ‘one that will be of more concern to more borrowers’.

‘The MMR has affected the amount [people] can borrow because [lenders] ask about more areas of your finances; pension contributions and childcare costs, which were not previously a factor [when borrowers were asked about spending] are now being taken into account,’ he said.

However, he added that even though a borrower may be an ‘outstanding candidate’ who ‘sails through’ the affordability test ‘they may still find lenders putting a lid on what they can borrow because of the [loan-to-income] cap’.

Nationwide is the latest lender to announce a cap on lending at 4.75 times income, and Lloyds and Royal Bank of Scotland – both owned by the taxpayer – have set a limit of four times income for property over £500,000.

Hollingworth said borrowers needed 'to be aware [of the caps] when pushing the outer limits [of their loan-to-income ratios]’.

He said the use of income multiples on top of affordability rules was essentially ‘gold plating’ of the lending rules, although he did not predict lenders rushing to place income caps on their mortgages.

While the income cap will impact everyone, those who are stretching themselves to afford a home will be the most affected, particularly first-time buyers.

‘It depends on the individual. You may live in London [where house prices are very high] but you may be buying with substantial equity because you enjoyed house price growth from a current property – in those circumstances [an income cap of] four time income may still be achievable,’ he said.

‘Those who are pushing for more [mortgage] like first-time buyers are the ones that are having to stretch.’

This goes some way to explaining the worrying increase in the number of young people unable to leave the family home. A report by housing charity Shelter revealed 1.97 million working adults between the ages of 20 to 34 are still living with their parents.

Half of this ‘clipped wing’ generation live with their parents because they cannot afford to rent or buy their own home, the charity said.

Getting tougher

If the rules around borrowing weren’t tough enough, the MMR  has encouraged lenders not just to grill borrowers on their spending but introduce more rigorous stress testing of their ability to pay their loan.

This means that instead of calculating affordability on today’s historically low 0.5% interest rate, banks and building societies also have to calculate whether a borrower would be able to afford a loan at a higher rate.

It goes without saying that interest rates will rise at some point in the near future, and Bank of England governor Mark Carney has intimated the rate could reach 3% in 2017, but lenders are pushing way above this level when it comes to stress testing.

Nationwide has announced it will impose a 6.99% stress test, meaning a loan will be judged on whether it could be paid back if rates hit that level.

For example a loan of £200,000 with a mortgage rate of 3.5% would cost £626 a month but at a rate of 6.99% the cost jumps 40% to £883.

Hollingworth said affordability was the ‘key hurdle’ as it contained two challenges of day-to-day spending and stress tests.

‘The other challenge…is increasing stress rates,’ he said. ‘The rules require lenders to look at affordability today but if rates increase how does that affect your affordability in the future? Stress rates are getting higher.’

5 comments so far. Why not have your say?

Keith Cobby

Aug 01, 2014 at 12:16

What the first time buyer needs now is a significant tightening up of the tax advantages for buy to let as these people are the group they are directly in competition with.

report this

Aidan Williams

Aug 02, 2014 at 10:48

That won't change the supply-demand imbalance for housing. We urgently need drastically more building of affordable housing and/or drastically less immigration (especially in London); two things successive governments seem unable to achieve. Things can only get worse by tinkering around the edges without addressing these fundamental problems. And building properties in so-called "prime" London that no one can afford except overseas investors isn't exactly helping; especially when many are deliberately left empty.

report this

mark antrobus

Aug 02, 2014 at 23:50

House prices are unaffordable because demand exceeds supply. Supply cannot be significantly increased because we live in one of the most densely populated countries in the world and there is little building land left. That means our spineless politicians need to bring immigration to a virtual stop - including from their beloved EU - so that as people leave the UK population can decline. Until this happens they are condemning us to live in smaller and smaller rabbit hutches.

report this


Aug 03, 2014 at 21:35

The easier the credit the higher the house prices.

Banks giving people more money to buy houses doesn't mean there will be any more people with houses as all the houses are already occupied and they aren't created on demand. These are the fundamentals that the people who makes decisions about Help to Buy and low interest rates refuse to see.

report this

Clive B

Aug 04, 2014 at 10:06

There was an item on yesterday's BBC1 Countryfile TV programme about house building. The locals in some place said they weren't against more houses but did object to a road being put in, as it would spoil the view and bring more traffic to the area.

That's the problem with a lot of Brits right there. Claim they don't mind housebuilding as long as it's not next to them, doesn't "ruin" the countryside or spoil their views.

They ignore the fact that EVERY bit of building ever done, including the house they live in, "ruined" something that was previously green fields. How do they think any towns were built. Shades of "I'm OK, I live somewhere nice, you can do what you like as long as I'm not affected in any way, or any area I can see or visit or see on the TV"

Bottom line is we MUST build lots more houses.

report this

leave a comment

Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.

Sponsored By:

Weekly email from The Lolly

Get simple, easy ways to make more from your money. Just enter your email address below

An error occured while subscribing your email. Please try again later.

Thank you for registering for your weekly newsletter from The Lolly.

Keep an eye out for us in your inbox, and please add to your safe senders list so we don't get junked.

Latest from Investment Basics

See all headlines


The Accumulator: FTSE see-saws on trade war fears

by Michelle McGagh on Jun 22, 2018 at 14:57

Sorry, this link is not
quite ready yet