Citywire for Financial Professionals
Stay connected:

View the article online at

SFO drops investigation into foreign exchange rigging

Serious Fraud Office says it has not found enough evidence to secure convictions after investigation lasting more than 18 months.

SFO drops investigation into foreign exchange rigging

The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has dropped its investigation into rigging of the foreign exchange market, claiming it has found 'insufficient evidence for a realistic prospect of conviction'.

The SFO took on the case in July 2014 after a referral from the Financial Conduct Authority. But after scouring 'in excess of half a million documents' it has now closed the probe.

'Whilst there were reasonable grounds to suspect the commission of offences involving serious or complex fraud, a detailed review of the available evidence led us to the conclusion that the alleged conduct, even if proven and taken at its highest, would not meet the evidential test required to mount a prosecution for an offence contrary to English law,' the SFO said in a statement.

The dropping of the case represents a blow and follows the acquittal of six traders alleged by the SFO to have rigged the Libor interbank lending rate earlier this year.

'Coming hot on the heels of the recent Libor verdict this will be embarrassing to the SFO,' said Alison McHaffie, a regulatory partner with law firm CMS.

'However, it does show the difficult job the SFO has in demonstrating criminal activity by individuals for this type of market misconduct and without a change in the law on corporate criminal responsibility. This means it is always easier to impose regulatory fines against the firms themselves rather than criminal prosecutions.'

Regulators in the UK, US and Switzerland hit five banks with a total £2.1 billion fine for foreign exchange rigging in 2014. Citigroup (C.N), HSBC (HSBA), JPMorgan Chase (JPM.N), Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) and UBS (UBSG.S) were all hit hard, after regulators found ineffective controls allowed traders to collude with each other over a period stretching back nearly six years.

Barclays (BARC) refused to settle with regulators at that stage, as it faced a separate battle with the New York State Department of Financial Services.

But it was hit by a second round of fines, in 2015, coughing up £1.5 billion, alongside a second round of penalties for RBS, JPMorgan and Citigroup. 

1 comment so far. Why not have your say?


Mar 16, 2016 at 12:48

Some call them fines, others might call them bribes.

report this

leave a comment

Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.

News sponsored by:

The Citywire Guide to Investment Trusts

In this guide to investment trusts, produced in association with Aberdeen Asset Management, we spoke to many of the leading experts in the field to find out more.

Watch Now

More about this:

Look up the shares

  • HSBC Holdings PLC (HSBA.L)
    Register or Sign in to receive email alerts for items in your favourites whenever we write about them
  • Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC (RBS.L)
    Register or Sign in to receive email alerts for items in your favourites whenever we write about them
  • Barclays PLC (BARC.L)
    Register or Sign in to receive email alerts for items in your favourites whenever we write about them

More from us


Today's articles

Tools from Citywire Money

From the Forums

+ Start a new discussion

Weekly email from The Lolly

Get simple, easy ways to make more from your money. Just enter your email address below

An error occured while subscribing your email. Please try again later.

Thank you for registering for your weekly newsletter from The Lolly.

Keep an eye out for us in your inbox, and please add to your safe senders list so we don't get junked.

Sorry, this link is not
quite ready yet