Citywire printed articles sponsored by:
View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/money/article/a456998
Smart Investor: goodwill and the basics of share valuation
In my previous article I introduced the basics of how to value companies. In this second part I look at the topic of goodwill in further detail.
Markets
In my previous article I introduced the basics of how to value companies. In this second part I will look at the topic of goodwill in further detail.
Goodwill or future profit
Goodwill should be viewed as future profit based on past profit. In other words you are buying the net assets of the firm for their current value and are buying a certain number of years of future profit which these assets generate. Buy too much future profit (goodwill) and you may have to wait some time to see a return on your investment.
Measurement of future profit is of course subjective, but by looking at past performance it is possible to glean an idea of what future profit may be (all discussion of ‘profit’ refers to net profit). By taking a weighted average of profit over the previous five years (an average which places slightly more emphasis on the most recent years) it is possible to make a conservative estimate of future profit. Furthermore, when analysing past profit you should look for consistency as opposed to up and down figures which could indicate that future profit may be volatile.
Time value of money
The time value of money is a subject that I will return to in future, but a profit of £100 today will not have the same relative value in 10 years time for example. Thus a discount rate must be applied to the future net profit figure in order to bring it back to present value. I normally assume a compound rate of 5% per annum; over a 10-year holding period this reduces future net profit by around 20-25%. 5% is a conservative estimate and allows for a generous level of inflation in future years.
In addition a margin of safety must be applied to any future profit figure. This is because future profit is a known unknown and you should attempt to produce a conservative estimate so as to mitigate against potential future difficulties which the firm could experience. Furthermore a margin of safety will mean you buy the shares for a lower price, the flip side being that you may miss some golden opportunities. The application of a margin of safety is simple; reduce the future profit figure by a sensible amount. Sensible to me is in the region of 20%.
The above does not take into account any increase in future profit for a very good reason; the future is always uncertain and profits can fall or rise in future. Thus I prefer to factor in zero profit growth so as to ensure that in this scenario I would still likely see a decent return over the period.
The number of years of future profit you are willing to buy will largely depend on your investment horizon. I normally assume a holding period of 10 years for shares, so start off with a multiple of 10 before discounting and applying a margin of safety. The multiple of future profit is entirely up to you; returning to a previous comment: it is the consistent application of a method of valuation which is key. In other words if you apply the same method to all FTSE 100 companies then you will still spot the ones which are undervalued.
Two examples
For example the current share price of FTSE 100 listed cruise ship operator Carnival is £27.57. Its five-year weighted average profit is around £1.65 per share and net asset value per share is around £16.60, thus you would currently be buying 6.6 years of future profit. Whether you feel this represents good value or not will depend on your investment horizon, discount rate and margin of safety.
Similarly FTSE 100 listed technology company Autonomy currently has a share price of £15.46. Its five-year weighted average profit per share is around £0.25 and net asset value per share is around £4.55, meaning over 36 years of future profit are included in the price. Again, the holding period, discount rate and margin of safety applied to future profit will determine whether this company is deemed undervalued or overvalued.
In future articles I will discuss the price to earnings ratio (P/E) in detail and indeed the P/E is a useful tool. However, it does not take into account net assets, which I think is a crucial consideration in the valuation of any company.
So in my view you should buy the net assets of a company for their current value and in addition purchase a multiple of discounted future profit less a margin of safety; future profit being derived from a weighted average of the past five years' profit. The original multiple used will depend on your investment horizon and you will be more generous the longer your horizon.
Valuing companies may seem traditional and old hat but it is a means of consistently ensuring you are paying a fair price for shares. If a company is valued by the stock market at below your valuation, this does not necessarily mean it is a diamond in the dirt; there are many other factors to consider, which I will discuss in future. However it does mean that the business in question passes the first difficult test and can be further examined under the microscope.
Sponsored By:
More about this:
Look up the shares
More from us
- Inflation Manifesto: our 10-point plan to help you grow your money
- Smart Investor: understanding the basics of valuing shares
- Smart Investor: why is Mr Market often wrong?
- Smart Investor: thank goodness Mr Market is often wrong
- Smart Investor: how to spread your investments effectively
- Smart Investor: what to know before investing your cash
- Smart Investor: back to basics part 3 – bonds
- Smart Investor: back to basics part 2 – cash
- Smart Investor: back to basics part 1 – shares
- Smart Investor: how to spot stockmarket bubbles
- Smart Investor: Must you choose between growth and income?
- Smart Investor: where is UK economic growth going to come from?
- Smart Investor: the difference between investment and speculation
- Smart Investor: Profiting from big brands
- Smart Investor: don't get caught out by Osborne's cuts
- Smart Investor: why shareholders should wake up to gearing
- Smart Investor: what is the correct attitude for an investor?
Archive
Today's articles
No fools here: April’s batch of the best fund managers by Nisha Long, James Poulter
FTSE drifts lower as investors ponder next move by Gavin Lumsden
Long on active managers: more on this month's winners by Nisha Long
The Expert View: FirstGroup, Halfords and BTG by Harry Brooks
FCA plans to ban and fine mutual director over conflicts of interest by Jun Merrett
Tools from Citywire Money
Weekly email from The Lolly
Get simple, easy ways to make more from your money. Just enter your email address below
An error occured while subscribing your email. Please try again later.
Thank you for registering for your weekly newsletter from The Lolly.
Keep an eye out for us in your inbox, and please add noreply@emails.citywire.co.uk to your safe senders list so we don't get junked.
Read more...
No fools here: April’s batch of the best fund managers
by Nisha Long, James Poulter on May 24, 2013 at 13:57







5 comments so far. Why not have your say?
William Bishop
Dec 28, 2010 at 11:02
This is an interesting way to look at share valuation, but the semantics require some qualification. The use of the term "goodwill" here is quite different from that in an accounting sense. In the latter, it is normally a balance sheet item that reflects the premium over book value paid in making acquisitions, to be written off over a period, which is not the same thing at all.
report thisPhil Stevens
Dec 28, 2010 at 11:53
Dead right William Bishop - perfect example was Connaught, no wonder it failed - with its balance sheet stuffed full of fresh air (goodwill) from outrageously overpriced acquisitions that were funded by debt. It didnt stand a chance when the order book was under threat and the Bankers somewhat late in the day crunched the numbers.
report thisQuark
Jan 11, 2011 at 12:09
I don't arrive at the same 'years of future profit' as Robert, when using his figures; so I'd appreciate an explicit step-by-step calculation (based on either Carnival or Autonomy) in order properly to understand the methodology - thanks.
report thisSmart Investor (Citywire)
Jan 12, 2011 at 08:15
Hi Quark
Thanks for your question.
There is a typo in the article which may be why your figure differs from mine. The price of Carnival should be £27.57 to give 6.6 years of future profit in the price (price correct at time of writing article).
The ‘years of future profit’ is calculated by firstly subtracting the net asset value per share from the current price per share. In Carnival’s case this is 27.57 – 16.60 = 10.97.
This figure is the goodwill element of the share price and in order to give an estimate of how long it will take Carnival to earn this goodwill, divide goodwill by net profit per share: 10.97/1.65 = 6.6 years.
I have used a weighted average of net profit from the last 5 years because it smoothes out any unusual years and places more importance on the most recent years. You could quite easily use last year’s net profit or a simple average for the last X years if you prefer.
I hope that answers your question, if not please feel free to come back to me; I always read all comments.
Thanks
Robert
report thisQuark
Jan 12, 2011 at 17:28
That's great, thank you. I do like the simple clarity of the method.
report thisleave a comment
Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.