Citywire printed articles sponsored by:
View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/money/article/a534463
Smart Investor: reach for the low-hanging fruit
Accepting your limitations as a market analyst will allow you to focus on underlying value, says Smart Investor.
Prev Close:
More FTSE charts & pricesPrev Close:
More FTSE charts & pricesPrev Close:
More FTSE charts & prices
Accepting your limitations as a market analyst will allow you to focus on underlying value, says Smart Investor.
Surveying the field
The range of different attitudes to investing never ceases to amaze me. Investing is incredibly subjective, and there are a seemingly infinite number of ideas about which companies to buy and sell.
For instance, some people look at only one company at a time, focusing their attention in an effort to understand how the business works and what makes it special. They will often examine the products or services a company offers, the markets the firm operates in, and at what price they sell their offerings. They will try to make an assessment as to whether the business model is sound, whether they themselves would operate the company as it's currently being run, and whether the future looks bright for the business.
Pro-forma analysis
Speaking of the future, other investors will try to predict the future performance of a company. They will conduct ‘pro-forma’ analysis in an attempt to generate a bottom line for next year and however many years they wish to look into the future. This is something that has always fascinated me – especially because it is often analysts working in the investment community who undertake this kind of guesswork.
The reason for my fascination is not in the method itself, but rather the fact that the predictions are nearly always wrong. Understandably, no human being is particularly good or consistent at predicting the future, so it not surprising that such analysis is incorrect the vast majority of the time.
However, the forecasts are still regarded as a worthwhile exercise in spite of their inaccuracy. Price-to-earnings ratios are often based on such forecasts, which I suppose in relatively benign trading environments could be of some limited use to investors, but in the current conditions such predictions really are a waste of everyone’s time.
Past performance does not guarantee...
Other investors will have particular views on regions, industries and sectors and will, again, try to predict which of these will perform well in future. This is often based on what is currently performing well – for example I constantly hear people talking about utilities being a good investment or saying that I should go into cash. These are only being considered because they would have been relatively successful had they been bought into a few months ago.
Many investors struggle to buy low and sell high because they are unable to overcome the emotion of fear when stock markets are low. This is a very common problem because people seem to forget that the time to buy is when share prices are low, and share prices are only ever low when there is some kind of major problem, either with the UK or most likely with the global economy.
Stock markets simply do not fall heavily without good reason.
Keep it simple and reap the rewards
This is, however, quite a straightforward problem to fix. The simple solution is to first accept that you are unable to predict the future. Once you do this, you will begin to see that ‘the market’ is actually a herd of people who are constantly chasing profit, but who are never able to step back and think about how to apportion their capital in a logical manner. In other words, they obsess over the short-term news flow and rarely consider where the long-term value lies.
By stepping away from the herd you will see that investing is simple, but not easy. If you buy sound companies at fair prices and have lots of patience to give them the time they need to come good, you are likely to find your capital increase at a faster rate than if you remain in the herd. You will probably sleep better too.
Investing does not need to be complicated. You do not need a unique talent or to be gifted in maths or any other subject. You just need to accept your limitations in terms of being unable to predict the future, focus on the facts and figures, and respond accordingly when the figures tell you to. Otherwise, buy yourself a crystal ball or some tea leaves and join the herd – they’d love to have you.
Tools from Citywire Money
More about this:
More from us
- Smart Investor: don't let predictions cloud investment decisions
- Smart Investor: learn to ignore the market noise
- Smart Investor: you're no Buffett, so ignore company management
- Smart Investor: back to basics to beat the market
Archive
Today's articles
- Rexam flies ahead on profit gains as FTSE lags
- How prepped up are you on your pension? Win £1,000!
- Barclays takes on Hargreaves in fight for DIY investors
- New warning of dreaded 'hard landing' in China
- Welcome to an uncertain financial future
- Barclays: customer complaints down but 'still too high'
- Chart of The Day: PPI victims paid £2 billion but owed billions more
- How to pay for long-term care of your loved ones





5 comments so far. Why not have your say?
Drogue
Oct 28, 2011 at 08:13
In essence, buy good companies with a good & progressive track record, a fair geographical spread and then hold for the longer term through the market variations, watching to ensure your holdings do not get out of step with the overall economic situation. It has paid me well over twenty + years of investing. If only I could buy those companies now at the late 80s prices.
report thisMichael Peters Fenwicks
Oct 28, 2011 at 09:02
I am afraid its better to keep it simple because majority of the time most investors are chasing profits and will not care about fundamentals.
Cease the day I say while also playing long and short objectives. Alternative is simply to chasing the direction of overall market instead of all the science above.
On the other hand I also think that those days when you understood the fundamentals are gone due to fact that sometimes specialist software will do all the trading for you.
In most cases software packages I always observe are mainly driven by directional activity other than anything else traditional investor adhere too!
The case above is the traditional way of doing things but once again I think that is SO YESTERDAY that the computer is now the age and will not go away - METHINKS!
In that case I introduce ALGORITHMIC TRADING where order, risk and market pulse are decided by the speed of light not forgetting no human intervention.
Do computers ever apply the above? I don't think so therefore direction of the market is sometimes the way to go.
That is simplicity in the end!!
report thisRobert Court
Oct 28, 2011 at 14:33
I'm not as clever as Michael Peters & Fenwicks (purveyors of algorithms to Her Majesty the Queen) but I do feel that maybe 'carpe dium' (surely not CEASE or obliterate the day but take advantage of the day) has a place in investment strategy; however one should never berate oneself for not seizing the day when you miss an opportunity as an infinite number of other opportunities shall be waiting over the horizon if you just have the killer patience of a lazy lion.
When clever computer algorithms dictate trading then these clever programs combined also act like herds and it's the wildebeest that stands out from the herd that either gets killed by the lion or gets the chance to chew all the best grass.
Lion or wildebeeste? Who cares as long as you survive and prosper!
I feel we have different investment strategies and different risk profiles at different stages in our lives; I am obsessed with maintaining and increasing investment income but also like to make huge capital gains at the same time so I'm at the wanting to have my cake and eat it stage of my life.
It's like eating a slice of cake and finding it's been replaced by several more slices of cake - disgusting but very, very nice! (I love it). :)
report thissnoekie
Oct 28, 2011 at 18:47
By all means progressive, solid companies, including utilities, but always a small proportion of apparently 'mad' money companies if the fundamentals look safeish, and I have a few of them (less than 5%).
If I have guessed right then they may boost my fund by 20%, quite apart from natural growth on the mainstream.
Most of the 'mad' money companies from 5+ years ago are up on the original investments and paying divis. 2 did not, <£1k loss. But then even some 'safe' companies hit the buffers (Cookson, Invensys, Motorola), much bigger loss.
But then quite a few investments taken over for a very decent return. Overall, +++++!
report thisdf1
Oct 29, 2011 at 10:06
An aspect that I often wonder about is buying a good looking prospect when the whole stock market is at a high (it may have been rising for some years so one cannot say that its 'low'). Any large liquid share will probably move with the general market to some extent.
Its the old question of is it a stock market or a market of stocks.
report thisleave a comment
Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.