Citywire for Financial Professionals
Stay connected:

View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/money/article/a871354

State pension age petition hits 100,000

Petition criticising increases in the state pension age for women born in 1950s gathers enough signatures for a parliamentary debate. 

 
State pension age petition hits 100,000

A campaign criticising ‘unfair’ increases in the state pension age for women born in the 1950s has reached the 100,000 petition signatures needed for the matter to be debated in parliament.

The 1995 Pensions Act first set out incremental women’s state pension age (SPA) rises from 60 to 65 to equalise it with men’s.

The 2011 Pensions Act then accelerated the timetable so women’s SPA would hit 65 by 2018 and both men and women would have a retirement age of 66 by 2020, meaning some women would have to wait an extra 18 months to receive their state pension.

Women born between 6 April 1950 and 5 April 1953 still have a SPA set by the 1995 Pensions Act of between 60 and 63 because they reach SPA before the introduction of the new state pension.

An online petition protesting against these changes was started by the Women Against State Pension Inequality (Waspi) campaign.

It is calling for all women born on or after 6 April 1951 affected by the changes to the state pension age to be ‘put in exactly the same financial position they would have been’ in if they had been born on or before 5 April 1950.

A backbench debate led by Scottish National Party MP Mhairi Black had already been scheduled for 7 January, but passing the 100,000 signature mark means Waspi’s petition must be considered for a full parliamentary debate.

The Downing Street Petitions Committee can decide not to debate an issue that gains 100,000 signatures, but this is rare, with only two currently listed on the government’s online petition website as being refused a debate.

Petitions to have recently hit the 100,000 mark and subsequently be debated include calls against airstrikes in Syria and the protection of bees from certain pesticides.

Waspi co-founder Anne Keen described reaching the landmark as an ‘emotional’ moment in the campaign.

In its response to the SPA petition, the Department for Work and Pensions said it would not be revisiting the arrangements, and that all women affected have been directly contacted following the changes.

‘The policy decision to increase women’s SPA is designed to remove the inequality between men and women,’ the DWP said. ‘The cost of prolonging this inequality would be several billions of pounds. Parliament extensively debated the issue and listened to all arguments both for and against the acceleration of the timetable to remove this inequality. The decision was approved by Parliament in 2011 and there is no new evidence to consider.’

The 2014 Pensions Act does provide for a six-yearly review of the SPA to take into account up-to-date life expectancy data and the findings of an independently-led review. The first such review will conclude by May 2017.

17 comments so far. Why not have your say?

Hampshire cynic.

Jan 04, 2016 at 17:42

It does seem that some women at some ages are going to be losing out, and this does seem to be unfair in many ways.

However, at the risk of bringing down much aggro onto my head, it does need to be remembered that female life expectancy is somewhat higher, according to what every actuary maintains, than us poor males. I will not be rash enough to give possible reasons for this!

So, over the long term, pension payouts should be roughly similar across the sexes.

I feel little vexed that I started taking my State Pension some years ago and will not therefore be getting any uplift to the new or proposed c£155pw level! It would be a waste of time to try and get Parliament to debate this 'unfairness' as we simply cannot afford as a country to do what everyone wants for their own situation. That nice/stupid/devious Gordon Brown wasted so much of our taxes on undeserving welfare a few years ago, and that cannot be reversed in quick time as we are seeing currently.

report this

jeffian

Jan 04, 2016 at 17:51

How's that going to work? We are already part way through the transitional period with many women born after 6/4/51 now receiving their pensions. Given that there can no longer be a legal distinction between the sexes (car insurance is now the same) and we are phasing in a common retirement age, what would the debate be about?

report this

mark antrobus

Jan 04, 2016 at 19:10

There is absolutely no reason why women should still be able to claim a state benefit namely the state pension at a younger age than men. As the article states, the equalisation was first set in motion in 1995, which is more than enough time to adjust one's expectations. Given that average life expectancy, once someone has reached 60, is probably in the upper 80s, how can there possibly be justification for spending nearly 30 years living at the expense of a younger working population? And just to clarify for people are genuinely unable to work there is still disability benefits or JSA. The only real justification for an earlier exception would be people who have worked a lifetime of a hard manual job and cannot physically carry on - in practice mostly men.

report this

Dena Andrews via mobile

Jan 04, 2016 at 23:13

In response to Hampshire Cynic; male and female life expectancy has equalised in recent years. It used to be skewed by war casualties and dangerous or unhealthy working conditions that primarily affected men.

Although the pendion age changes affect me directly, the general principles of equality outweigh personal gain.

report this

J Thomas

Jan 05, 2016 at 14:02

As women live on average three years longer than men there is surely justification for men to receive the state pension at 67, and women at age 70.

report this

dd

Jan 05, 2016 at 22:32

It is an argument of course JT, but in that case women's car insurance should reduce, life assurance should increase etc. Equalisation if fine but it should have been phased in better.

report this

KP via mobile

Jan 08, 2016 at 18:55

Having worked from the age of 15 yrs old I will have worked 50 years by the time I receive my pension in three and 1/2 years

At 62 years old I find it increasingly more physically challenging as a psychiatric nurse. Not only dealing with physically fit people with dementia but younger men and women who suffer alcohol and drug related problems who are often aggressive and unpredictable. My concerns are although I take every precaution to keep safe there are times when incidents occur out with your control , this may result in injury and in some cases _ compensation.

I don't think my sons and granddaughter want to see their mum and granny with bruises and injuries from someone throwing a punch. As I maybe too slow to see it coming.

This is the reality of my profession as a psychiatric nurse.

I,d love to sit behind a desk in some government department making decisions on someone else's retirement plans

report this

carolineripley via mobile

Jan 23, 2016 at 20:03

Would like to sign petition for unfair pension age.!!!

report this

Marie O'Donnell via mobile

Feb 01, 2016 at 10:13

I was born in December 1953.

My pension age has been moved twice.

It doesn't seem fair that women born at the beginning of 1953 are receiving their pension now and I have to wait over 3 years before I receive mine!

report this

Angela Surtees via mobile

Feb 16, 2016 at 20:28

I can't understand how it as happened I have worked hard for 30+years never claimed benefits and now when I come to retirement age it's moved six years to 66.people coming into this country don't have to work half of them don't even speak English and are given benefits straight away I feel like a second class citizen in my own country

report this

Angela Surtees via mobile

Feb 16, 2016 at 20:46

I can't understand how it as happened I have worked hard for 30+years never claimed benefits and now when I come to retirement age it's moved six years to 66.people coming into this country don't have to work half of them don't even speak English and are given benefits straight away I feel like a second class citizen in my own country

report this

Beverley Colclough via mobile

Feb 24, 2016 at 14:19

I was born in July 1951soI won't receive the new pension amount. This is grossly unfair as I had to wait for my pension but we don't appear to have been catered for. Why?

report this

Susan Serridge via mobile

Feb 24, 2016 at 20:08

I was born in May 1954 and was horrified when I learnt the retirement age was rising for women born between 1951 and 1954 and that I could not retire until I was 64 years 8 months and now I have been told that women born after April 1954 have been picked on again and my new retirement age is 65 years 8 months! When is it going to stop!!! Why is the Government changing their minds all the time?

report this

Margaret Greville via mobile

Feb 27, 2016 at 13:27

Think this group of women deserve a fairer deal

report this

karen Lewis via mobile

Mar 22, 2016 at 21:51

Im unable to work until. 65. I grew up knowing i would finish work at 60. I think it is dam right illegal. What has happened. Im worn out now. PUT IT BACK NAZIS.

report this

janet walker

Jan 14, 2017 at 23:20

if pension was reverted to 60 for women jobs would be available for younger people as we are holding jobs that they cannot have.

report this

janet walker

Jan 14, 2017 at 23:20

if pension was reverted to 60 for women jobs would be available for younger people as we are holding jobs that they cannot have.

report this

leave a comment

Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.

News sponsored by:

Greater Europe and Emerging Europe A comprehensive approach to investing in Europe


Making the most out of Europe's potential means seeing things differently. Learn more about how BlackRock's focused approach to investing in Europe helps investors unlock the continent's vast potential.

Watch Now

The Citywire Guide to Investment Trusts


In this guide to investment trusts, produced in association with Aberdeen Asset Management, we spoke to many of the leading experts in the field to find out more.

Watch Now

Today's articles

Tools from Citywire Money

From the Forums

+ Start a new discussion

Weekly email from The Lolly

Get simple, easy ways to make more from your money. Just enter your email address below

An error occured while subscribing your email. Please try again later.

Thank you for registering for your weekly newsletter from The Lolly.

Keep an eye out for us in your inbox, and please add noreply@emails.citywire.co.uk to your safe senders list so we don't get junked.

Read more...

Investment Trust Watch: Temple Bar's Happy Mundy

by Gavin Lumsden on Feb 24, 2017 at 15:01

Sorry, this link is not
quite ready yet