Citywire for Financial Professionals
Stay connected:

Citywire printed articles sponsored by:


View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/money/article/a417147

Stress tests: what the results mean for bank shares

Many European bank stocks have risen following publication of the EU stress test results, although there are concerns the tests may not have been tough enough.  

Pass rate set too low

The fact that only 8% failed in Europe compared to a 47% failure rate in a test of US banks is one of the reasons some are worried the European testers failed to do what is needed.

There are two main areas of concern; whether the banks have enough capital to cope with another downturn and whether the tests do enough to bring about new market confidence, lead to looser credit markets and enable banks to refinance at affordable prices.

Real tests still to come

If lenders remain reluctant to lend to some banks because they are not convinced by the results of the tests it is possible that all banks may have to pay more to borrow.

Mark O’Sullivan, director of dealing at Currencies Direct, said: ‘It seems the tests may have raised more questions than they have answered and in the coming weeks it will be the interbank lending markets that will have the real answer as to whether real confidence has returned to the European banks.’

Simon Samuels, analyst at Barclays Capital, believes too many banks are fighting over a limited supply of funding.

‘With or without a stress test, Europe’s banks still have €1.5 trillion of debt maturing by 2012, as well as the need to repay over €500 billion to central banks,’ he said.

He thinks higher overall funding costs – and the differential in costs among banks – will remain in the months ahead.

What does that mean for shares?

Most agree that the massive jump in bank shares that followed the US and UK tests will not be repeated in Europe over the coming weeks.

There remain regulatory risks with a number of plans to rein in the banks still being considered in the UK and across the globe.

A key catalyst is the final decision on how much capital banks will be required to hold. Recent talk has suggested that the Bank of International Settlements has been listening to the banks and rules will be watered down. But there will still be some uncertainty until a final decision is made.

Alan Webborn, analyst at Societe Generale, said: ‘We favoured strong banks before the tests and our view has not changed on publication of the results.' His key recommendations are Barclays and Lloyds.

Others agree that the relative strength of the UK banks and the upcoming earnings reporting season means UK bank shares could outperform over the weeks ahead. All bar RBS are on many brokers' 'buy' lists.

Sign in / register to view full article on one page

7 comments so far. Why not have your say?

Anonymous 1 needed this 'off the record'

Jul 26, 2010 at 13:23

Hmm, judging by previous experience I wonder if the so-called "stress tests" tested for enough stress? Somehow, considering the events of 2007-8 I suspect not!

report this

Jonathan

Jul 26, 2010 at 13:24

You might find if you buy Lloyds that they don't advance rapidly. The govenment own most of Lloyds and are going to gradually sell them, which they may even have started doing now.

report this

Chris B (Slough UK)

Jul 26, 2010 at 13:53

The tests change nothing and as everyone suspects were only as stressful as those in power wanted them to be. The tests also do not cover the very likely sovreign default of a country and possible knock on effects. Time will tell.

report this

joe stalin

Jul 26, 2010 at 14:08

As long as banks are required to have absurdly high tier one capital ratios Vince and any of the muppets currently enjoying the oversight of our banmks can forget about the banks becoming more willing to lend. The sooner the lunatic fringe back off the sooner the tax payers which have lent the finance industry a few bob to stave off bankruptcy will get his money back with a handsome profit to boot. Vince and his band of sandal wearing bearded bunch of anoraks need to ride off into the sunset and start hugging some trees and leave our financial sector to sort itself out.

report this

Jonathan

Jul 26, 2010 at 15:34

joe stalin, what's wrong with sandals and anoraks? I agree about beards though.

report this

joe stalin

Jul 26, 2010 at 16:42

I think you catch my drift Jonathan :)

report this

Graham Thompson

Jul 26, 2010 at 18:57

Wasn't our financial sector sorting itself out at our expense before, and causing the mess we are now in?

report this

leave a comment

Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.

Sorry, this link is not
quite ready yet