Citywire for Financial Professionals
Share this page:
Stay connected:

Citywire printed articles sponsored by:


View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/money/article/a867253

Tax hikes add to mounting risks for buy-to-let landlords

A double whammy of tax hikes for buy-to-let investors is not the only potential headache for aspiring landlords, warn financial advisers.

 

by Rob Griffin on Dec 18, 2015 at 12:31

Tax hikes add to mounting risks for buy-to-let landlords

The chancellor has made life more difficult for buy-to-let investors through a double whammy of tax hikes, but it is not the only potential headache for aspiring landlords, financial advisers have warned.

Chancellor George Osborne last month announced a 3% increase in stamp duty for buy-to-let properties in the Autumn Statement, following his summer Budget cuts to mortgage interest rate relief for second home owners.

‘It’s been a pretty brutal attack on buy-to-let by the chancellor,’ said Jason Witcombe, a director of London-based Evolve Financial Planning. ‘Lots of our clients have buy-to-let properties, although it’s not something that I’ve recommended as I’ve seen quite a lot of people lose money in this area.’

Witcombe said many investors had made money from buy-to-let purely because they happened to live in an area where prices had risen.

‘We can sometimes become fixated with London and the South East, whereas other areas of the country haven’t experienced anything like the same rises,’ he said. ‘I always advise clients not to get sucked into the hype that property prices can only go one way.’

Justin Modray, director of Buckinghamshire-based Candid Financial Advice, said the changing environment and increased transaction costs were a cause for concern, but pointed out the sector had done well for investors since the mid-1990s.

‘There’s no doubt it has been a particularly lucrative investment over the last 20 years for many people, primarily due to the meteoric rise in residential property prices in the UK,’ he said. ‘But going forwards there are some question marks.’

He said the first was property valuations. ‘Prices seem to keep rising but when you compare these increases with average earnings it’s hard to see how this can continue over the next five to 10 years – although we could have said the same thing a decade ago,’ he said.

Rate hike fears

Another concern for property investors is the looming prospect of rising interest rates.

‘This could be a double whammy for buy-to-let investors as rising rates would be a leveller on house prices, while those borrowing money to invest in a buy-to-let property will see their costs increase,’ said Modray.

If the chancellor’s recent announcement is the start of an increasing wave of taxation pressure on the buy-to-let market this could be disastrous, said Andrew Merricks, head of research at Brighton-based Skerritt Consultants.

‘The more unattractive it becomes from a cost point of view the more people will look to get out,’ he said. ‘If there’s a reversal of the tidal wave of people that went into it, there will suddenly be a lot of property available and investors will be selling into a falling market. This means you won’t get your capital back if you bought at the wrong time.’

Merricks said he also had concerns over liquidity. ‘You have to be able to turn any investment into cash at very short notice because if things aren’t working out you want to change your mind without penalty and costs,’ he said.

Troublesome tenants

While commercial property is a key part of many portfolios, principally exposure to specialist funds that buy and manage a wide variety of office, industrial and retail space, buy-to-let poses more challenges.

Carl Melvin, chief executive at Paisley-based Affluent Financial Planning, advises clients to give buy-to-let a wide berth. He is well placed to judge as he has been an investor in this area for the past decade.

‘When you work out how much everything costs to set up and manage, particularly with all the obligations you have as a landlord, the return on your investment is not as compelling as it initially appears to be,’ he said.

He said the most significant negative was the lack of control over the outcome. ‘If the tenant loses their job or experiences financial difficulties, their problem becomes your problem,’ he said. ‘If they don’t pay their rent it’s a difficult situation to resolve through the courts.’

There are also unforeseen expenses. ‘If a significant repair needs to be carried out to the building this can wipe out your profit from the investment,’ he said. ‘If nothing bad happens and people pay their rent it’s wonderful, but life isn’t like that.’

Melvin believes a lot depends on a person’s reasons for entering the buy-to-let sector. If they see it as a generator of longer-term capital growth it can make sense, but if they want it to generate an income things are slightly different.

‘If you rely on the income, or are retired, you don’t want it exposed to that kind of risk,’ he said. ‘You want a predictable, reliable income stream, and my concern with buy-to-let is that when it goes well it’s wonderful but when it goes badly it’s terrible.’

11 comments so far. Why not have your say?

Ms Dislexic Landlord

Dec 18, 2015 at 13:45

BTL is now finished

Move over now for the Professional Landlord via a Ltd Co

Even I have been shocked at te new changes

There is a new Market opening especially when all the small Landlords understand whats going to happen

I own a new Ltd Co and I will be transferring property at some cost but its worth it

looking long term we will have a crash and homeless Tenants and rents will rise

a perfect storm

lower priced property higher yields are on the cards

FTB will not buy up Landlord property in general some will of course but HMO will sit empty

This govt has now set out the new rules an if im right buying back in when the crash happens will be a golden opportunity for the ones who have stood back and waited

its not over but the game has changed

Learn adapt and change

if you want to stay in the business

Ms Dyslexic Landlord Managing Director

report this

Codger

Dec 18, 2015 at 18:57

Undoubtedly the government had made btl less attractive.

It will be interesting to see what happens if landlords start to sell. I have always had the feeling that outside major cities, people don't really want a flat but prefer a house. However flats have been convenient for landlords and short-term tenants alike. Also, with so many young people unable to buy a property, if they eventually can afford to buy they will be of the age to think of starting a family and wanting a house. So maybe the price of flats will go down and small houses will do better.

report this

Luc Zagbo

Dec 18, 2015 at 20:40

I think as citizens we are being cornered. If you are employed by the state, you can not no longer control your retirement. The retirement age is now 68 and I am quite sure in a few years time, the government will increase it to 70. If you are a self employed wanting to prepare your retirement by investing in property, you are hammered.

There seems to be no way out for one to gain financial independence unless you are Bill Gate or Mark Zuckenberg.

The sad thing is, it is a conservative government that is clobbering people who are working hard, using their own money to invest in properties and provide a service to the rental market.

I thought that is what Capitalism was about.

report this

C Cloy

Dec 19, 2015 at 10:11

I believe that Andrew Merricks is absolutely correct in his assumptions. I further believe there is going to be tsunami of BTL property coming onto the market in the next few years even though many landlords will switch their portfolios into a Limited Company.

Landlords will find in most areas rents will not be forced to rise as many hundreds of thousands of tenants will become FTBs and then use their "rent a room relief" tax allowance to provide accommodation for tens of thousand more tenants in order to assist them with their mortgage costs. FTBs will be the new generation of landlords!

The PM, Chancellor and the Governor of the Bank of England have all "played a blinder" over reducing the attraction of the BTL sector thereby reducing the risk to the economy in addition to assisting generations of aspiring FTBs.

report this

underscored

Dec 19, 2015 at 10:45

My word you lot are in a parallel universe. Tenants vote Labour, owners vote Tory - SIMPLE, you are fighting the tide, so stop being King Cnuts and sell now. Or rebel and vote Labour (ha ha).

Yes there will be a stampede of properties onto the market and the price will have to drop to a price affordable to the next level of buyers. I very seriously doubt professional companies will by broken terraces in Kent and Cumbria - they will BUILD to rent, totally different market and hopefully the big ones will want REIT status. If leveraged landlords start incorporating expect to be CRUSHED in the next budget or Autumn statement.

BTL is bad for Britain, it's bad for families, bad for young people, bad for the banks, bad for financial stability, bad for the economy and it still has stupid IO loans which are a weapon of financial mass destruction, allowing you to get us all in such a mess in the first place. Be gone and don't trouble us all again.

report this

Ms Dislexic Landlord

Dec 19, 2015 at 11:13

I do agree BTL is finished

the days of the working man or women building a business from nothing are over

IO is the worsted thing you can have Now ???

The new Ltd Co model has great advantages 18% corp Tax is ok with me and yes I can now fund my own Directors Pension

Its strange world I bought Property for a pension

Now the Property funds my new Pension

what a world we live in

We will always need Rented Property and I am happy to provide it in the future

More Lenders are coming to the Market for Ltd Co

of course lending rules will tighten just like MMR but if you buy on yield and hold you will make very good money indeed

Parallel Universe yep your right I only look after myself now I have no faith in any Govt to be honest

There will be less Landlords in the future but the ones who stay will be large Players indeed

Just watch what happens its all there to play for

report this

Ms Dislexic Landlord

Dec 19, 2015 at 11:19

Just read the blog from C Cloy its strange how when you own a property you want to make money from it by renting a room

I that not a bit like the kettle calling the pan Black lol

its no more than Landlords have done for years

report this

underscored

Dec 19, 2015 at 11:23

Renting a room in your own house is not the same as evicting a family from a house and renting it back to them.

Property is not a business, it is an investment, HMRC have just clarified.

As to the future of IO and BTL, well it seems BCBS are going to put the stake through the heart, enjoy! http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/12043703/Global-regulators-join-crackdown-on-buy-to-let.html

report this

Ms Dislexic Landlord

Dec 19, 2015 at 11:44

I could not agree with you more

I have never bought of a seller an rented a home back

And I have never evicted anyone in over 30 years ???

And I don't think most landlords do it either

BTL is an investment not a Business and this is the reason HM Govt is jumping on it

I have said IO is mad Now

The new lending rules will come into play But I am No longer a BTL investor going forward I am a Director of a Business and the wrapper has changed

I have spoken to a number of lenders this week all want the same thing Large Deposits and Capital and repayment

I do have BTL on Repayment already and have used that model since the crash

the reason what BTL was not on Capital and repayment ws it was taxed as a profit at 40%

Capita and Repayment via a Ltd Co will be taxed soon at 18% and the major biggy is I can now fund a Pension which is tax deductible via a Ltd Co

There are a great number of advantages of owning a Ltd Co I can give shares to my children and grandchildren in the years to come when I step down from the Business world with a nice new Pension

I love city wire because it just shows how bloggers look only for the bad and the downfall of others that thought in my mind is quite sad

The world has changed in Property investment the old ways of get rich fast are over which I think is no bad thing

It will cost me money to transfer Property which I own But the rewards for my family are worth every penny in the long run

in The dark look for the light true spirit of a self starter money maker

report this

Dave Hill

Dec 20, 2015 at 14:46

I'm retired and would like to get out of BTL, but I can't afford to. eg. I bought a 2 bed mid terrace in 2007 for £80,000. They are now selling for £50,000. Who will pay £80,000 for an old property when you can buy a new 2 bed house for £69,950. I live in the north east where house prices are not rising, but they have stabilized. They say they might start going up soon.

report this

www.commercialtrust.co.uk

Dec 21, 2015 at 17:10

"Landlords will find in most areas rents will not be forced to rise as many hundreds of thousands of tenants will become FTBs..." C CloyDec 19, 2015 at 10:11

Assuming that they can afford to. The point of intervention, we are told, is to prevent a boom from turning into a bust; i.e. to stop the buy to let debt from turning bad much like the sub prime debt of yesteryear and depressing prices as landlords exit en masse or are repossessed.

Discouraging landlords from investing won't ensure that there are more properties to purchase, just that there are fewer to rent. Housing options for the younger generation will narrow. Either that, or prices will have fallen, and the government will have shot themselves in the foot by causing prices to fall as a result of the actions they took to prevent that from happening.

report this

leave a comment

Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.

Sponsored By:

Weekly email from The Lolly

Get simple, easy ways to make more from your money. Just enter your email address below

An error occured while subscribing your email. Please try again later.

Thank you for registering for your weekly newsletter from The Lolly.

Keep an eye out for us in your inbox, and please add noreply@emails.citywire.co.uk to your safe senders list so we don't get junked.

Latest from Investment Basics

Read more...

Banks and miners hit FTSE on Trump's healthcare loss

by Daniel Grote on Mar 27, 2017 at 16:03

Sorry, this link is not
quite ready yet