Citywire for Financial Professionals
Share this page:
Stay connected:

Citywire printed articles sponsored by:


View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/money/article/a418736

The man who wants to save child trust funds

A campaign is growing to save child trust funds from the scrap heap. Do you agree parents and family should be allowed to continue saving into the schemes for children, even if the government stops handing out free money?

by Gavin Lumsden on Jul 30, 2010 at 13:23

Shaw says CTFs already fit the bill of what the government is looking for and that their abolition would be a backward step: ‘Parents like the discipline of the money being untouched until their child reaches 18, at which point it can be rolled into an ISA,’ he said.

‘The simplicity is also attractive: it’s in the child’s name, it’s for the child, there are not the trustee complications you get from taking out other savings on behalf of a child.’

The Personal Finance Education Group, which promotes the teaching of personal finance to children in schools, has used child trust funds as a way of getting pupils’ interest.

Petition

Shaw can only hope that a government that promotes the virtues of ‘Big Society’ will see the bigger picture and ditch CTFs because they were a Labour initiative.

‘Just because the child trust fund was the idea of the last government does not mean it was not a good idea. Just because we are seeking savings does not mean it should be killed off altogether,’ he added.

Shaw said: ‘The alliance accepts there is no money to fund vouchers for new parents at present, but we believe very strongly that keeping the CTF open to new parents is a proven way of encouraging saving and will require very little government support.’

The alliance is asking supporters to sign a petition at its www.savechildsavings.org website.

Do you think it is right to campaign for child trust funds? Please give us your comments below.

Sign in / register to view full article on one page

2 comments so far. Why not have your say?

Guy MacNaughton

Jul 30, 2010 at 15:18

CTF's were a gimmick, a cheap vote winner and not an appropriate use of tax payers money. And like so many other such schemes, of little long term value, helping the few that qualify. "Small", simple non-invasive government is what we want. It is not surprising that the lobbying companies have taken up in arms, they were benefiting from Government/taxpayers money. Instead encourage investment by adults for minors and give tax breaks if it is really necessary. But isn't this already in place with current pension legislation?

report this

jingoistic

Jul 30, 2010 at 16:17

Never agreed with them in the first place. If you want money for the kids star a savings account, you should not expect taxpayers to help out. Whilst we are at it abolish Family allowance or what ever it is called, again amother thing the Tax payer has to pay for,

report this

leave a comment

Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.

Tools from Citywire Money

Today's articles

From the Forums

+ Start a new discussion
Sorry, this link is not
quite ready yet