Citywire for Financial Professionals
Stay connected:

View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/money/article/a1039787

Treasury hits pension transfer jackpot

Treasury officials have spoken to City regulator about the estimated £50 billion switched out of final salary pensions that could stimulate the UK economy.

 
Treasury hits pension transfer jackpot
 

Pension freedom reforms have spawned a new mini-industry around transferring valuable rights out of defined benefit or final salary pension schemes.

With 80,000 transfers going through over the 12 months to 31 March 2017, the market is clearly booming. Consultancy firm Mercer estimates £50 billion has been moved from schemes to individuals since the pension reforms were introduced two years ago.

Most of the money has been switched to defined contribution, or money purchase, schemes where the ultimate pension will depend on how much an individual has put in his or her pot and how much it has grown.

This has created a bit of bonanza for fund managers, who get a chance to attract more money for them to invest in bonds and shares.

Such a huge movement of capital is clearly not only interesting to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), which is inspecting the quality of financial advice in this area, but also to HM Treasury.

A freedom of information (FOI) request made by Citywire’s New Model Adviser® asked the Treasury if it had held any meetings with the FCA to discuss DB transfers.

The answer was yes.

The Treasury responded: ‘A telephone conference with the FCA staff on the specified subject [DB transfers] took place on 15 March 2017. Two Treasury policy officials participated, but no ministers.’

Hitting the jackpot

The Treasury was as tight-lipped on the matter as its grip on the nation’s purse strings, but its interest in DB transfers will stem from its desire for the pension freedoms to succeed.

The Treasury made £1.2 billion more than expected in tax receipts from the freedoms last year (totalling £1.5 billion). But the flow of money is also boosting consumers’ bank accounts.

Indeed, the rise of DB transfers was recently described by Standard Life as having created a new wave of unexpected ‘lottery winners’.

With the rise of these new lucky DB transferees, it is inevitable they will use some of it on consumption, such as helping their children pay for their first homes (or even buying new sports cars).

So perhaps the Treasury’s interest is not just in the tax take, but how DB transfers might help inject a little more life into the economy as the older generations flex their newfound spending power.

Everyone’s a winner

Transfers are also a way for large corporations to get rid of long-term DB liabilities, freeing up the businesses for growth. The Financial Times reported in June that one financial services company used transfers to knock off £100 million from pension liabilities over a six-month period.

The UK economy grew by just 0.3% over the three months to June. Throw Brexit uncertainty into the mix and it is clear to see why the Treasury would be interested in pension cashflows. Not only does the Treasury not want to see any limits placed on the pension freedoms, it will be happy with the short-term effect of the billions moving through the system because of transfers.

It has been said before that the amounts shelled out by banks over payment protection insurance (PPI) claims did more to aid the recovery than quantitative easing from the Bank of England – PPI was more effective at putting spending money in peoples’ pockets electronic money printing.

Therefore the Treasury would have no reason to want the FCA to stem the tide of transfers.

What was said or was not said at the meeting between the Treasury and FCA on pension transfers is unlikely to be made public. But it is clear that while financial services has enjoyed the churn generated from the pension reforms, the Treasury has also been a winner from the DB transfer glut.

3 comments so far. Why not have your say?

Ray Henderson

Aug 04, 2017 at 17:57

I always thought that pensions were in place to provide an income in your old age. Just another example of the financial irresponsibility of the Tory government, allowing people to squander their pension funds to give a short term boost to the economy. Then of course in their old age they will claim benefits off the State because they have no pension.

report this

mark antrobus

Aug 04, 2017 at 21:41

Do these people really understand the rights they are giving up?

report this

JohnR

Aug 04, 2017 at 23:33

QE was never about the real economy.

report this

leave a comment

Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.

News sponsored by:

The Citywire Guide to Investment Trusts


In this guide to investment trusts, produced in association with Aberdeen Asset Management, we spoke to many of the leading experts in the field to find out more.

Watch Now

Today's articles

Tools from Citywire Money

From the Forums

+ Start a new discussion

Weekly email from The Lolly

Get simple, easy ways to make more from your money. Just enter your email address below

An error occured while subscribing your email. Please try again later.

Thank you for registering for your weekly newsletter from The Lolly.

Keep an eye out for us in your inbox, and please add noreply@emails.citywire.co.uk to your safe senders list so we don't get junked.

Read more...

David Kempton: update on RedT Energy

by Gavin Lumsden, David Kempton on Jul 17, 2017 at 07:00

Sorry, this link is not
quite ready yet