Citywire printed articles sponsored by:
View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/money/article/a407061
UK house price inflation climbs to over 10%
But the proportion of first time buyers falls to a three year low, lenders report.
Prev Close:
More FTSE charts & pricesPrev Close:
More FTSE charts & pricesPrev Close:
More FTSE charts & pricesby Victoria Bischoff on Jun 15, 2010 at 13:37
Follow @VBischoffAnnual house price inflation rose to over 10% in April to stand at its highest level since October 2007, according to government figures released today.
The Department for Communities and Local Government said house prices in April this year were 10.1% higher compared to April 2009. This took the average house price to £207,516, which is 0.4% higher than in March.
Northern Ireland was the only UK country to see house price inflation fall, with house prices dropping by 8.9%. Prices rose 10.9% in England, 2.2% in Scotland and 11.3% in Wales.
However mortgage lending in April dipped slightly, according to separate research.
The Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML) said there were 40,000 loans advanced for house purchase in April worth £5.7 billion, down from 45,000 in March, but up from 35,000 in April 2009. CML blamed April's figures on a 'seasonable dip'.
Meanwhile CML said first-time buyers made up the lowest proportion of house purchase loans since September 2007, accounting for 35% of loans - down from 39% in March and 38% in April 2009.
The CML claims this is because first time buyers are struggling to get a mortgage as they tend not to have the high deposits demanded by banks.
Michael Coogan, director general of the CML, said: ‘Easter traditionally causes a dampening of lending levels and this year was no exception’.
‘First-time buyers were particularly affected, perhaps because of the alteration to stamp duty, and in anticipation of the changes arising from the economic and political uncertainty of recent months.’
Tools from Citywire Money
Today's articles
- The Friday Five: lessons from Dickens about money
- Barclays: the figures to make you – but not Bob – weep
- GlaxoSmithKline: why I like this 'big and boring' share
- The week in numbers: loans, bills and funny money
- Week Ahead: a ‘pleasant interlude’ and a mighty market mover
- Saturday Papers: Cameron calls for truce on bonuses
- Britain’s biggest savers: who they are and where they invest
- Tesco profit warning shows vulnerability of defensives, Steve Cordell says





10 comments so far. Why not have your say?
Jonathan
Jun 15, 2010 at 14:46
Maybe there is such a shortage of housing that we don't need first time buyers to support the market?
report thisTim Dawson
Jun 15, 2010 at 15:05
With 870,000 empty homes in the UK there is no shortage of housing in the UK. The reason mortage lending is down is due to the banks not wanting to lend and making their loan criteria much more stringent.
As soon as interest rates get back to 5% the whole pack of cards will come tumbling down...
report thisAnonymous 1 needed this 'off the record'
Jun 15, 2010 at 15:23
If the market does not require first time buyers to support it, how do the so-called first time buyers house themselves??
Or, to look at it another way... perhaps couples should be stopped from breeding altogether. Seems our economy doesn't need another generation of humans to support it if this assertion is correct!!!
report thisNigel
Jun 15, 2010 at 15:47
The cards will eventually fall just a question of when and what triggers the fall. England is one of the few countries in the world I have lived in where making a six figure income (in Sterling) just allows you to rent a two bed flat in Surrey. Something has to give when you need a £200,000 for a downpayment on a three bed house in Surrey. This cannot last forever when the average income is £35,000 in Guildford. You either inherit the money, have equity in property, make £150K + or year or win a Lotto jackpot to own a house in Surrey. I would expect only 5% of the population have this. I would expect this will apply to most areas in the UK.
report thisDavid Husband
Jun 15, 2010 at 16:13
Agree Nigel. The problem with the low interest rates and the "quantative easing" was that it did not allow the housing market to come back far enough to make houses actually affordable. In other words there was not sufficiently long or deep a recession to adjust for the years of excess. As a result even those who can "afford" to buy are, in the main, taking out huge mortgages that they have no hope of ever repaying. The economics of the madhouse comes to mind
report thisDislexic Landlord
Jun 15, 2010 at 17:12
House prices will always go up over the long term
we live on an island and we are not building houses and the british have a love affair with property
Just watch cable TV and see the programs
Im glad i have a lot of property and i have invested over a long time and i will hold onto my property for the rest of my life
if i had taken the advice of Finacial advisers and banks and stock brokers I would be still working 9 til 5 till the age of 75
no I think im sticking with property unless someone else can show me an alternitive
i would be intrrested to have the views of so called experts
report thisChris
Jun 15, 2010 at 17:49
I hope plenty of people "stick with property" - we need lots of people to lose big time if we are to pay for the mess.
report thisJane
Jun 15, 2010 at 18:05
The reason house prices are so high in the UK is a combination of 3 factors that can be directly laid at the door of the Labour Govt.
1.Browns ill thought through assault on taxing pension dividends plus some unrealistic regulations all of which led to the collapse of company schemes and hence the growth of private landlords trying to rescue their retirement.
2.A huge increase in immigration (2 million plus) all needing housing.
3.Central Govt control on Local Authorities house building expenditure.
The issue of house price inflation is not rocket science but base on the simplest law of economics-DEMAND exceeds SUPPLY = PRICE RISES
report thisDislexic Landlord
Jun 15, 2010 at 18:16
chris what sour grapes maybe envey
report thisTruth Searcher 2
Jun 15, 2010 at 19:38
Apart from the first sentence, Dyslecksic Lanlord is right. Try and imagine property going up at just 5% per year for ever more. Wages going up about 2% for evermore. The two will become so diverse that the median person wouldn't have a home to live in, rented or bought. We all know that situation would lead to massive change, possibly even revolution. At the very least a very left wing government in place, voted in by those very people without a home. That would stuff property as an investment. Far better to have realistic growth even for people with lots of property.
report thisleave a comment
Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.