Citywire for Financial Professionals
Stay connected:

View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/money/article/a1039703

Why women have to work harder to save

If you want a comfortable retirement, the odds are stacked against you if you’re a woman.

 
Why women have to work harder to save
 

In the battle for gender equality there is one area where women seem to be losing ground: money.

A report out this week from the Institute of Fiscal Studies (IFS) revealed more than a million women in their early 60s have been made poorer by raising the age at which people can take the state pension.

The campaign group, Women Against State Pension Age Inequality (Waspi) has been fighting for some sort of transitional arrangement, which while it is gaining support in some quarters does not look like it will happen.

There are plenty of people arguing on behalf of Waspi and against, and I’m not going to get into that argument now, but the IFS report does serve as a reminder that women need to work harder than men to ensure they save enough.

While great strides have been made in gender equality, money is still one area that women fall short. Typically, women still take on the majority of caring responsibilities, whether that be children, disabled relatives, or elderly parents, and this hampers their ability to earn and to save.

Research by Zurich showed there isn’t just a gender gap in the state pension as women also face a shortfall in their workplace pensions. They are hit by a triple whammy of smaller salaries, more greater career breaks and men (who are not taking career breaks) moving into higher-paid, senior positions ahead of women.

And this triple whammy is costly. In fact it’s costly to the tune of £47,000 over a woman’s working life. According to Zurich, the insurer, that’s the sum that women miss out on in employer pension contributions over their working life, and last year on average, men aged under 35 received £217 more in employer pension contributions than women of the same age.

The fact women receive less is due to the persistence of lower salaries when compared to men, and as employer pension contributions are paid as a percentage of salary, women lose out.

All these factors set us up for a retirement on the breadline. But we’re maybe not helping ourselves either. When I write about women and money, I often think back to an article I wrote five years ago that looked at how men and women save.

Interestingly, when men thought about saving they did so for the long term, investing their cash and locking it into pensions. Women on the other hand were more short-term in their thinking, and more likely to save for a rainy day fund that could protect their family in the event of an emergency.

In an ideal world, of course, we’d all have an easily accessible rainy day fund and long-term savings to provide a comfortable retirement. As it stands, 20% of women aged 55 to 65 have no retirement savings, according to Aegon, and women of this age that have saved have put aside £24,900 compared to £73,600 for the average man of the same age.

What these figures, and attitudes to long and short-term savings, tells me is that women need to be a bit more selfish. They need to put their retirement first and not see their savings as ‘family’ money to dip into when needed. In short, we have to mimic men, and start locking away our money and be brave enough to invest it.

Research from RateSetter shows that women are half as likely to hold stocks and shares as a man, and men are more likely to put their money into investment products - 66% of men compared to 48% of women.

The government is taking steps to close the gender gap in pay and positions of power, requiring larger companies to disclose the pay gap between male and female staff from next April.

Minister for women and equalities Justine Greening said eliminating work-related gender gaps could boost the economy by as much as £150 billion but until that pay rise comes in, women need to take responsibilities for their savings - and probably work harder to save than their male counterparts.

3 comments so far. Why not have your say?

Nigel Harris

Aug 05, 2017 at 09:09

Gynocentrism, solipsism, hypergamy, victimhood, etc.

report this

Seasoned cynic

Aug 07, 2017 at 08:26

Nigel Harris. Is the truth about working women's income, putting family first for savings, enforced career breaks to care or have children etc. really that hard to understand?

I'm sure a journalist could turn this the other way and say how bad it is that men don't have to take career breaks and it's worse for them to be paid more than women etc. but I've yet to see a single report along those lines.

If you can't make a constructive comment, don't bother!

report this

Anonymous 1 needed this 'off the record'

Aug 08, 2017 at 09:25

@ Nigel Harris

Misogyny, blockheadedness, abusiveness, victimhood, etc.

report this

leave a comment

Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.

News sponsored by:

The Citywire Guide to Investment Trusts


In this guide to investment trusts, produced in association with Aberdeen Asset Management, we spoke to many of the leading experts in the field to find out more.

Watch Now

Today's articles

Tools from Citywire Money

From the Forums

+ Start a new discussion

Weekly email from The Lolly

Get simple, easy ways to make more from your money. Just enter your email address below

An error occured while subscribing your email. Please try again later.

Thank you for registering for your weekly newsletter from The Lolly.

Keep an eye out for us in your inbox, and please add noreply@emails.citywire.co.uk to your safe senders list so we don't get junked.

Read more...

Treasury hits pension transfer jackpot

by Jack Gilbert on Aug 04, 2017 at 09:30

Sorry, this link is not
quite ready yet