Citywire printed articles sponsored by:
View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/new-model-adviser/article/a530754
Adviser Insight: Why we need a new approach to risk
by Steve Buttercase on Oct 14, 2011 at 11:01
Throwing in the towel too early
What information should the financial planner communicate about risk?
It would be useful to develop a version of a risk scale that was as clear as Prof Spiegelhalter’s, and some have tried to. Many portfolio risk measurement tools show something akin to a child’s spinning top where the fattest area represents the most likely outcome. Most of these failed to anticipate the 2008 correction accurately but, even then, most portfolios subsequently recovered to within the ‘safe zone’.
Similarly, the reason thousands of people threatened with repossession of their homes in the last housing slump decided to give up the struggle and hand their keys over to lenders was partly a misconception about the risks involved. Yes, they felt betrayed and confused after the great promise of continuously rising housing prices failed to appear and they were left in negative equity. But it was also because they were suddenly forced to confront the viability of their personal balance sheet – maybe they lost their job, or repayments became unaffordable. It became a straight black or white choice: stay put or go.
Surely any adviser facing these choices today would advise at least attempting to stick it out? That is risk management too, albeit disguised.
The way forward
The challenge for the industry after the retail distribution review is to invent an alternative to the one-size-fits-all risk systems thrown down by the networks and national firms as appropriate solutions to the risk conundrum, and then resume the focus on client education.
Risk is often a mirage that can seem horribly real at the time but is no worse than many other aspects of everyday living. In the 24-hour media age, with its focus on negatives, it is tempting to just disengage rather than understand it properly.
When was the last time you saw the headline ‘£500 billion added to the stock market in another steady week for shares’? That’s what I thought. Risk has an upside, sometimes a spectacularly good one. Motorbikes, bananas and trips to New York can be highly enjoyable and are probably worth it.
Anyway, I am not sure how many microlifes I have spent writing this article or how many you have spent reading it, but at least you haven’t been riding a horse while doing so, have you?
Steve Buttercase is a financial planner and IFA at Sense Financial Solutions
Markets
News sponsored by:
Today's top headlines
- Ofqual criticises CII level four diploma over gaps and easy questions
- FSA: Platforms can't reward IFAs for assets after RDR
- SimplyBiz's Ken Davy to launch restricted national
- FSA warns over advisers failing to consider cost of fund switches
- Concept hopes to fill client knowledge gap with ISA handbook
More about this article:
More from us
- Fowler: why wealth managers are to blame for suitability crackdown
- Should psychometric testing be the benchmark for client risk?
- FSA reveals adviser failures in investment suitability review
- Talking about risk is good for business





10 comments so far. Why not have your say?
Kate Brookes
Oct 14, 2011 at 13:39
This is a really interesting and thought provoking article.
How great to read something that is of real value to me, much better than the latest FSA dictat, or who has got the most money under management.
Thankyou.
report thisWGFS
Oct 14, 2011 at 13:57
Yes great article and one I actually read rather than the who has got £100M or more under management.
report thisThe party's over!
Oct 14, 2011 at 13:59
Ditto!
report thisTrevor C
Oct 14, 2011 at 14:00
Excellent article Steve.
report thisThe Scud
Oct 14, 2011 at 14:12
A clients tolerance to risk is directly proportional to the level of emphasis and importance they place upon achieving their genuine objectives.
It is beyond comprehension and total nonsense that investors are tagged 'cautious' moderately cautious, slightly more ..etc
But as we see historically the Investors so called tolerance to risk will be prostituted inversely to the size of potential financial re dress.
They define the target we advise the magnitude of bullets required..its a big boys world ...sorry I should be PC and say its a big persons world
BIG OBJECTIVES , MEANS BIG COMMITMENT,
report thisJonathan Kirby
Oct 14, 2011 at 14:23
One of the biggest snags is that people are often prepared to to take risk for the upside they anticipate, but don't like it when things go the other way.
They then perhaps blame the IFA who should have seen every blip that governments and regulators failed to spot.
I often find myself going for less risk than the client says he or she is prepared to accept and build a portfolio of a few satellite funds round a large core of cautious multi-asset.
The consequence of this is that the overall returns may not be as good, but I get very few calls from worried clients and find my night-time's are less disturbed.
report thisKaren Wagg
Oct 14, 2011 at 15:24
I like the idea of discussing units of certainty rather than "risk", which immediately suggests 'danger' or loss for most people. A very interesting article.
report thisDave Knight
Oct 14, 2011 at 15:36
Excellent article. Makes a change to read something both thought-provoking and not related to IFAs remuneration (or lack thereof).
There should be more of this sort of stuff in CityWire, like the hour by hour commentary a couple of weeks ago when something of genuine importance occurs.
Wonder if Hector read it?
report thisLydia Molyneux
Oct 14, 2011 at 16:25
Good to see that you are still on the ball Steve!
report thisTerence O'Halloran
Oct 14, 2011 at 16:32
Refreshing. I enjoyed that. Thank you.
report thisleave a comment
Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.