Other Citywire websites

Citywire printed articles sponsored by:


View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/new-model-adviser/article/a406434

Centre for Policy Studies: eight proposals to reform retirement saving

by William Robins on Jun 14, 2010 at 15:29

Centre for Policy Studies: eight proposals to reform retirement saving

Influential economist Michael Johnson has outlined eight proposals to reform retirement saving, including inheritance tax (IHT) free pension fund bequests and a single contribution limit for pensions and ISAs.

In a paper for the Centre for Policy Studies, entitled Simplification is the Key, Johnson argues for early access to pension funds and aligning pensions and savings taxation more closely.

He recommends IHT-free pension fund bequests up to £100,000, auto-enrolment into ISAs, removing tax on annuity income and a single savings contribution limit for pensions and ISAs.

‘Currently people have two questions: am I going to save and, if I am going to save, do I want to access it or take the tax bribe? Either way people could end up feeling they made the wrong decision,’ said Johnson. ‘What I am proposing is taking away that second question.’

The paper suggests early access to 25% of assets in a pension wrapper and the option of re-nominating ISAs as pension savings.

‘What we are trying to do is move ISAs and pensions closer together under a single tax regime. For example, there would be a limit of £45,000 shared between pensions, £35,000 annually, and ISAs’ £10,000 annual limit,’ said Johnson.

The paper also calls for exemption from income tax for annuities bought with ISA funds. This would then be combined with an extension of workplace pension auto-enrolment to ISAs.

‘The point is that ISAs are very popular and they attracted £37 billion of subscriptions last year while workers put £24 billion into pension savings,’ said Johnson.

‘If people are willing to save at all then why not go the next step and include ISAs in auto enrolment?

‘It would increase ISA assets and it is in the government’s interest to encourage people to buy annuities. Just don’t tax [annuity income]. People buy an annuity to ensure they have income, let’s not penalise that unfairly.’

1 comment so far. Why not have your say?

Is it ME!

Jun 15, 2010 at 08:38

It seems so much more logical to move taxation onto spending, we see this in operate abroad, and it doesn't stop holiday makers, it seems fair to me that whilst visiting and enjoying the infrastructure of your hosts that you should help contribute to it's upkeep. I totally agree with the articles call to keep it simple and easy to understand, that way more people will want to do pensions and savings. To engage the masses we need to overcome the barrier of " but if I do something for myself I will lose my ENTITLEMENT from the state!"

report this

leave a comment

Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.

Sorry, this link is not
quite ready yet