Citywire printed articles sponsored by:
View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/new-model-adviser/article/a348097
Cru on a knife edge as fund trail is blocked
by Daniel Grote on Jul 06, 2009 at 09:46
Arch security for the loans is the distribution agreement between it and Cru that is thought to entitle Cru to 0.9% of the annual management charge of the funds. But if fees from the funds continue to be cut off, this security is effectively worthless.
In a letter being sent to advisers invested in the funds today, Ainscough calls for the custodians to reinstate the fees and points specifically to the danger that Cru may have to default on the loans.
The letter reads: ‘The funds will be used to repay the loan to the Guernsey ICCs [the cells] and avoid a write down of the Cru debt (which would be to the ultimate detriment of investors!).’
As authorised corporate director, Capita is responsible for paying Arch for managing the funds. But it needs the approval of BNY Mellon and HSBC. Acting as trustees, they are able to stop the payment of fees if they believe it is in the interest of investors to do so.
Cru relies on a separate arrangement with Arch for its remuneration, but Arch has stopped paying Cru after Arch stopped receiving money from Capita, Ainscough said.
Markets
News sponsored by:
Today's top headlines
- Ofqual criticises CII level four diploma over gaps and easy questions
- FSA: Platforms can't reward IFAs for assets after RDR
- SimplyBiz's Ken Davy to launch restricted national
- FSA warns over advisers failing to consider cost of fund switches
- Concept hopes to fill client knowledge gap with ISA handbook
More about this article:
More from us
- Cru defends soft loans as investments
- Cru borrowed £3.2m in soft loans from Arch fund cells
- Arch to manage Cru fund 'cells' despite FSA restrictions
- FSA clamps down on Arch following Cru funds suspension
- Cru admits re-opening of funds 'extremely unlikely'





5 comments so far. Why not have your say?
William George
Jul 06, 2009 at 11:53
I have client money in CRU. I don't want any trail fees...I'm just concerned about my clients investment that's all.
report thisMike Pendergast
Jul 06, 2009 at 12:20
One of the downsides of taking trail commission - no guarantee it will always be paid!
report thisGraeme Urwin
Jul 06, 2009 at 15:31
There is a simple solution to Mike Prendergast's point saying there is no guarantee trail will always be paid.
Dont have an investment process that has them. Use a Wrap Platform, agree the fees the client will pay you for what level of service, and if the fees are say above £1,500pa, then also provide cash flow modelling etc.
Its very simple really - work for the client (not the product provider) and help them acheive their goals in life.
report thisWillem Vlok
Jul 07, 2009 at 09:57
Will any investors get there money back? I invested in Arch Private Finance Strategies IC Limited (Class A Shares (GBP)). We asked for redemption on 27 February 2009 and still have had nothing.
report thisJohn Whipple
Jul 07, 2009 at 15:33
Looking bad isn't it.
Looks like a further call on FSCS is in the pipeline ? - Where is all this money going to come from?
report thisleave a comment
Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.