Citywire printed articles sponsored by:
View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/new-model-adviser/article/a339140
Darling admits there was 'no science' to his Budget
by Michelle McGagh on Apr 29, 2009 at 17:03
Chancellor Alistair Darling has admitted that there was ‘no science’ behind his decision to impose a 50% income tax on salaries over £150,000 in the Budget and could not promise that he would not make more changes to pensions.
Darling (pictured) when asked why he chose the £150,000 figure by MPs at a Treasury Select Committee meeting, said: ‘There was no science, just my judgement. I felt it was appropriate as it is the top 1%.’
When questioned on whether he had looked at other rates that might yield more tax, Darling replied: ‘I wanted to push it up as high as I could but did not want to increase tax for those on modest incomes.'
He added: ‘In present circumstances we need to take action and support our economy and I think this is fair thing to do.’
MPs said Darling had been accused of using the 50% tax rate for political manoeuvring which the chancellor did not accept.
‘It is a fair way of ensuring we raise revenue and that decision is mine and I stand by it,’ he said.
‘We still take a cautious view of how much we will raise. The yield from this measure raises a substantial revenue.’
On the tapering of pensions tax relief for those earning £150,000 to £180,000 the committee said that the government had broken long-standing rules and looked for assurance that pensions would not be tampered with again.
‘I do not want to, said Darling. ‘I can see the logic of aligning relief to the rate of income tax but if 25% of relief goes to 1% of top earners, that is not right.
‘I do not think it is unreasonable to tell people in the top percent they have to make a contribution.’
Markets
News sponsored by:
Today's top headlines
- Ofqual criticises CII level four diploma over gaps and easy questions
- FSA: Platforms can't reward IFAs for assets after RDR
- SimplyBiz's Ken Davy to launch restricted national
- FSA warns over advisers failing to consider cost of fund switches
- Concept hopes to fill client knowledge gap with ISA handbook
More about this article:
More from us
- Darling reveals new 50% tax rate
- SJP sales drop 4.9% and warns Budget measures will hit pension business
- ‘Wealth attack’ sparks debate on pensions and salary sacrifice
- Sipps look sick after Budget brake on pension consolidation
- Budget 2009: govt prevents high earners maxing pension contributions before 2011
- Budget boosts appeal of offshore bonds and other non-pension alternatives





2 comments so far. Why not have your say?
Duncan Carter
Apr 29, 2009 at 17:35
There's not much science to anything this lot are doing and certainly no art!
I think our pips are going to be squeaking for some considerable time to come after the latest bout of borrowing.
Still keeps the civil servants in pensions anyway!
report thisclive foulkes
Apr 29, 2009 at 18:35
This lot of half arsed goons do not think at all. As already said here and by me before, the lot of the civil sertvice and local government pensions is a disgrace to all of us not in the cosy club. And the public sector (I wrote that on purpose, it was not a slip) are still adding endless NON-JOBS. I wish we were more like the French in that when they have had enough of an incompetent lot, they get rid, starting with covering the roads in shit. They have no idea of accountability. You can scoff at Maggie if you like. At least we had sound money and the world listened. I c annot stand the supercilious smug grin of Brune, he of the Manse upbringing.
report thisleave a comment
Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.