Other Citywire websites
Stay connected:

View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/new-model-adviser/article/a636568

FSA defends tougher Sipp cap ad for commercial property

by William Robins on Nov 22, 2012 at 15:23

FSA defends tougher Sipp cap ad for commercial property

The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has defended plans to place higher capital adequacy requirements on Sipp providers holding commercial property in their books, pointing to the illiquidity of the asset.

Under the FSA’s plans for reform of Sipp capital adequacy requirements, it will require providers including ‘non-standard’ assets, such as unregulated collective investment schemes, on their books, to hold more capital in reserve.

The FSA has drawn up a list of standard assets, with any assets not on that list triggering the higher requirements. Commercial property has not been included on the non-standard assets list, despite being widely held by Sipps.

David Geale, FSA head of investment policy, said the classification was fair because it was based on liquidity rather than risk. Since commercial property investments can take months to wind-up or transfer it has been deemed non-standard, he said.

‘Including commercial property does not unduly affect Sipp providers. We are not saying it’s a risky investment but it’s about the ability to wind down,’ he added.

He said that the 12-month lead-in to the introduction of the rules meant Sipp providers have a year to decide whether to hold more capital or consolidate.

He added the Sipp industry must ‘move forward’ with the proposed capital adequacy regime even though the reforms could lead in some cases to members being left without a provider.

‘We will look closely at how they are making these changes, but they have a year until the rules come in,’ he said.

‘We have to start somewhere. Some firms may decide to leave the market but the whole point of the proposals s to protect consumers. Therefore it will get to be difficult for some but we have to move forward.’

2 comments so far. Why not have your say?


Nov 22, 2012 at 16:29

how on earth does added capital in reserve provide a safety net for the end user, the price of the underlying asset (ie the commercial property) will still vary.

yet another example of lip service by the FSA bychance?

report this

Arthur Schopenhauer

Nov 22, 2012 at 22:05

More of the objective showing of favouring the large institutions restricting choice this is what happens when an institution answers to no one makes mistake after mistake and yet imagines it is blameless I hope they feel the "consistency" of Cameron's attack on expanding bureaucratic budgets.. let the Greek Finance minister design the 2013 Budget for this lot

report this

leave a comment

Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.

News sponsored by:

Opportunities emerge as production moves back home

As the UK coalition government strives to rebalance the national economy, so called 'reshoring' looks set to play an increasingly important role in economic recovery.

Today's top headlines

A spotlight on Alastair Mundy

Alastair Mundy met Citywire's Daniel Grote at the London Stock Exchange Studios for a detailed interview about the Investec Cautious Managed fund.

Sorry, this link is not
quite ready yet