Citywire printed articles sponsored by:
View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/new-model-adviser/article/a647435
Halifax charging blunder could spark payouts
by Daniel Grote on Dec 24, 2012 at 10:38
Thousands of Halifax customers could be able to claim compensation after the bank forgot to tell them it was raising the price of their accounts, according to The Sunday Telegraph.
The bank said a small portion of the million customers who use its Ultimate Reward account did not receive letters informing them of the price hike from £12.50 to £15 a month.
It told the Telegraph it was now writing to them informing of the change, and had ‘sought advice’ over whether compensation was due. It added it was required by the Financial Services Authority to give two months’ notice of price and terms changes on the account.
Markets
News sponsored by:
Today's top headlines
- IFAs vent frustration at lack of re-reg progress
- Lighthouse ties up with Aviva for exclusive protection offering
- Barnett Waddingham: give trustees power to block pension liberation
- Standard Life to pay platform rebate tax for investors
- Treasury: Scottish independence will disrupt pensions and advice
More about this article:
Look up the shares
What others are saying
Archive
Read more...
IFAs vent frustration at lack of re-reg progress
by Jun Merrett on May 20, 2013 at 10:27







1 comment so far. Why not have your say?
Julian Stevens
Dec 27, 2012 at 10:30
The banks, building societies and other DPI's are making massive profits from the billions, perhaps hundreds of billions of pounds languishing in various accounts under which the rate of interest being paid has declined to negligible levels. Cash ISA's are a prime example, under which, after 12 months, the rate being paid typically falls to something like 0.25% p.a. or even less.
Whether this is due to people ignoring letters notifying them of rate changes or because the letters themselves are framed in such a way as to underplay just how poor the rate has now become I know not, but I would have thought that the regulator should take steps to ensure they include a clear comparison with:-
1. the rate that was being paid when the customer first started using that particular account,
2. the best rate/s available from alternative accounts and
3. point out the wisdom of reappraising the best rates available in the open market.
Simple. So why hasn't the regulator acted? Too preoccupied with other things perhaps?
report thisleave a comment
Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.