Other Citywire websites

Citywire printed articles sponsored by:


View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/new-model-adviser/article/a427776

HSBC may leave the UK if forced to split

by Deborah Hyde on Sep 03, 2010 at 09:39

HSBC may leave the UK if forced to split

HSBC has hinted it may consider moving its headquarters overseas if a commission on banking reform recommends banks split their investment banking arms from their retail operations.

HSBC's head of investment banking Stuart Gulliver told a conference on banking he is ‘genuinely concerned’ that banks will be forced to split their businesses, which he said would have ‘significant implications’ for where HSBC chooses to locate its headquarters, currently in Canary Wharf.

HSBC’s chairman Stephen Green has already warned that unilateral rules could mean London will become less attractive than rival cities such as Hong Kong and Zurich, while Angela Knight, chief executive of the banking lobby group British Bankers' Association, has warned that would mean the UK could lose billions in tax revenues.

In June chancellor George Osborne announced that the head of the Office of Fair Trading, John Vickers, will head up a commission to consider whether any banking industry reforms are necessary to prevent a re-run of the financial crisis.

As well as looking at increasing competition and reducing the risks and impacts of bank failures the commission will consider how much competitive advantage large banks get ‘from being perceived as too big to fail’.

But bankers have repeatedly said that while there are many lessons to be learned from the financial crisis there has been little evidence that size mattered.

Barclays’ chief executive John Varley has said historical data shows that bigger, more complex banks are not more likely to fail.

‘The evidence from the last 100 years is clear. By converting broad banks into narrow banks we will make the system less safe not more safe,’ he said earlier this year.

HSBC - which employs 50,000 staff in the UK - refused money offered by the UK government at the peak of the crisis and was relatively unscathed by the crisis thanks to its focus on Asia.

In January this year chief executive Michael Geoghegan relocated to Hong Kong but the bank said this reflected the rising importance of the Asian market and was not the start of a large scale move.

Sign in / register to view full article on one page

2 comments so far. Why not have your say?

Julian Stevens

Sep 03, 2010 at 12:41

And, unless the profligacy, self interest and virtually total lack of accountability of the FSA (to name just three issues) are addressed when it is superseded by the CPMA, life companies will do the same. Who can blame them? The black cloud of oppressive and biased regulation, dressed up as striving for "better consumer outcomes", has become so dreadful that it's costing the industry more and more to earn less and less.

report this

Kevin Neil

Sep 03, 2010 at 12:56

The comment from John Varley @ Barclays misses the point (which is entirely to be expected from one with such a vested interest!). This is not that big banks are more or less likely to fail, but that the consequences (and subsequent bail-out costs) of a big bank failing due to undue risks taken by its investment banking side are so much greater than the consequences and costs of a narrow retail bank failure.

If the UK taxpayer had only had to bail-out the like of Dunfermline BS, B&B, and Northern Rock, instead of taking on RBS and Lloyds then we would be in a far better position.

If the likes of Barclays and HSBC want to continue as integrated banks then they would be better advised to come up with some cast-iron way of ensuring that the casion operations can be spun off and allowed to fail instead of dragging down the Retail side with it and triggering large bills for the taxpayer.

report this

leave a comment

Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.

Sorry, this link is not
quite ready yet