Citywire printed articles sponsored by:
View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/new-model-adviser/article/a418366
Integrity's Stamp clashes with critics in court
by Nicholas Paler on Jul 30, 2010 at 10:26
'Integrity should have made these risks clear to investors, but it did not; neither did it ensure that the promotional material given to IFAs selling its product described the risks sufficiently.'
The FSA said there had been insufficient evidence of personal culpability by anyone at Integrity.
Markets
Other markets
News sponsored by:
Today's top headlines
- Ofqual criticises CII level four diploma over gaps and easy questions
- FSA: Platforms can't reward IFAs for assets after RDR
- SimplyBiz's Ken Davy to launch restricted national
- FSA warns over advisers failing to consider cost of fund switches
- Overnight Markets: Wall Street erases loss amid European optimism
More about this article:
More from us
- Ex-Integrity head Iain Stamp heads to Italy to present on currency trading
- Nedas criticises Mint over Integrity compensation
- Stamp markets Integrity loss-maker lookalike fund
- FSA condemned for ignoring role of banks in Integrity censure
- FSA censures Integrity but waives £350,000 fine





4 comments so far. Why not have your say?
Anonymous 1 needed this 'off the record'
Jul 30, 2010 at 11:36
Margaret Cole, the FSA's director of enforcement and financial crime, said at the time: 'Geared traded endowment policies are complex products with significant risks attached to them.
'Integrity should have made these risks clear to investors, but it did not; neither did it ensure that the promotional material given to IFAs selling its product described the risks sufficiently.'
I didn't go anywhere near these products but the comment above makes me wonder.
Did anyone with a compliance background or acting as a regulator comment on the promotional literature was sent out to IFAs?
Before the company had problems!
report thisSimon Kershaw
Jul 30, 2010 at 12:26
Borrowing to invest is a risky practice for sophisticated investors.
Why was this not picked up sooner by the FSA?
report thisLuxemburger
Jul 30, 2010 at 15:59
But most financial advisers willingly arrange large borrowings for clients to invest in illiquid assets that take months to buy or sell.
report thisAnonymous 2 needed this 'off the record'
Jul 30, 2010 at 18:30
Sorry FSA but we have no effective regulators in the UK.
We have a hit squad who clear up the mess after the event - regulating with hindsight like an auditor- who get rewarded handsomely for this sorry state of affairs. This failure despite FSA draconian powers and their ability to get paid anything they so desire.
Todays Tip for the FSA - Try enforcement of regulation BEFORE the event and save the UK consumer (and IFAs) some money. NOT after.
report thisleave a comment
Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.