Other Citywire websites

Citywire printed articles sponsored by:


View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/new-model-adviser/article/a411321

Lifemark investment adviser Meditron resigns

by Iain Martin on Jul 02, 2010 at 10:35

Lifemark investment adviser Meditron resigns

Meditron Asset Management has resigned as investment adviser to the troubled life settlement vehicle Lifemark, which backed Keydata products.  

The New York-based investment company was responsible for selecting the life settlement policies which make up the Lifemark portfolio.

‘They have decided on their own to resign,’ said a source close to Lifemark. ‘At this time they had a very limited added value service and quite significant fees.’

Lifemark was put into provisional administration by the Luxembourg financial regulator in November, which stopped it paying income to investors in February 2010 due to liquidity problems.

However, Meditron chief investment officer Walter Gerasimowicz claimed in March 2009 that Lifemark maintained adequate cash reserves to meet its obligations to pay premiums and argued that investors should be pleased with the performance it had delivered.

Geoff Hartnell of Vintage IFA and a member of the Keydata creditors committee said that Gerasimowicz and Meditron had questions to answer about the problems with Lifemark portfolio, pointing to the liquidity problems caused by not enough life policies being redeemed.

‘Look at the investment reports and Meditron are talking about good performance but Lifemark was predicted to have 30 to 35 deaths a year but it has actually experienced eight to 10 maturities a year. I would regard that as under performance,’ said Hartnell, adding that he had concerns about the quality and construction of the Lifemark portfolio.  

Meditron's role was to liaise and verify the work of Montage Financial Group, which was responsible for sourcing the life settlement policies for Lifemark.

The 25,000 investors who put £350 million into Keydata products backed by Lifemark are still waiting on a restructuring deal, which was understood to involve US hedge fund CarVal Investors.   

Meditron was contacted for comment but did not respond before publication.

6 comments so far. Why not have your say?

Anonymous 1 needed this 'off the record'

Jul 02, 2010 at 11:56

And the Grand old duke of York of the FSA wants us post RDR to consider such investment vehicles for the man in the street all the time.

Right up there with 'geared wine funds', AIM IHT friendly portfolios.

Why not simply buy the wine and drink it yourself and donate the money to a good cause or enjoy yourself.

Ordinarily I would describe myself as a positive person but ...........................

report this

Anonymous 2 needed this 'off the record'

Jul 02, 2010 at 14:47

To Anon 1 - actually the FSA do not want us considering these lifesettlements as mainstream going forward as was reported by Citywire earlier this year following a speach by Peter Smith (FSA) which is available on the FSA website I think.

report this

david kirby

Jul 02, 2010 at 16:13

Rats and sinking ships come to mind.

report this

Anonymous 3 needed this 'off the record'

Jul 02, 2010 at 17:29

actually the article is rubbish. The liquidity problems in Lifemark were caused by the Luxembourg regulator not allowing Lifemark to continue with its business model of raising funds by issuing bonds to the market.

The investment manager actually did what was on the tin, and achieved a higher IRR than was required. Policy maturity delays impact performance as well as liquidity, but this was all taken into account. What was not taken into account was that the regulators would be so stupid and put investor money at risk.

report this

Quentin McCormick

Jul 03, 2010 at 09:01

Anonymous 3

I really cant believe your in any way serious? Do you really expect the Luxembourg regulators to allow an authorised company to borrow from Peter to pay back Paul. Have you never heard of a ponzi scheme?

I dispair....................

report this

Anonymous 4 needed this 'off the record'

Jul 04, 2010 at 19:58

Dear Anonymous 3. What you describe is more commonly known as a Ponzi Scheme.

report this

leave a comment

Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.

Sorry, this link is not
quite ready yet