Citywire printed articles sponsored by:
View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/new-model-adviser/article/a417134
Lifemark rescue talks with CarVal collapse
by Iain Martin on Jul 26, 2010 at 07:32
Lifemark could still sign a deal with CarVal or another third party which was willing to invest into the portfolio.
‘The only way to pay for the premiums is to look to a third party funding or sell assets,’ said a source. ‘It is not easy to sell assets in the current environment…It is sad for investors but unfortunately this is what they have invested in.’
The FSCS announced last week that it would make a decision in September on whether Lifemark investors would be entitled to a payout. The FSCS said it had carried out an in-depth investigation into Lifemark with the support of the Financial Services Authority and Keydata administrator PricewaterhouseCooper.
Even if the FSCS confirms investors are eligible for a payout, they may face a long wait before they can make a claim.
Many investors have lost income but could struggle to prove that they have suffered a capital loss when Lifemark remains in administration and the performance of its portfolio could improve.
Another Luxembourg-based life settlement vehicle, which was involved in earlier restructuring talks with Lifemark, has been suspended to new investors.
Catalyst Investment Group has closed its ARM Capital Growth bond product and ARM Assured Income plan products to new investors.
Catalyst claims it closed the product and pulled literature from its website while it tried to move them to Dublin.
Money invested in the ARM Capital Growth bond product is used to buy life settlement assets which are held in bonds listed on the Dublin Stock Exchange.
These bonds are owned by a Luxembourg-based special purpose vehicle called ARM Asset-backed Securities SA but Catalyst hopes to novate the bonds to a new special purpose vehicle based in Dublin.
Catalyst claimed to have been working on the plan since January but was unable to explain why this was necessary.
Prev Close:
More FTSE charts & pricesPrev Close:
More FTSE charts & pricesPrev Close:
More FTSE charts & pricesNews sponsored by:
Today's top headlines
More about this article:
More from us
- Keydata investors face up to 14-year wait for refund
- Keydata scandal causes 500% FSCS claims hike
- FSCS plans September judgement for Lifemark compensation
- Keydata victims ask: who is Stewart Ford?
- PwC racks up £1.94m in Keydata fees
- Lifemark investment adviser Meditron resigns
- FSA says it was 'pro-active' in tackling Keydata
- Stewart Ford blames FSA for Keydata collapse
- FSCS refuses to explain why it rejected Keydata claim
- Lifemark paid 10% commission to Ford’s offshore company





4 comments so far. Why not have your say?
Harry K
Jul 26, 2010 at 10:00
If the details of the proposed deal were accurate it is no bad thing that CarVal has withdrawn. How would you like to wait 14 years to be repaid?
Yet again - will the FSCS please stop fannying about and start compensating Lifemark customers. Am I being a simpleton about this? I thought that is precisely what the FSCS is there for, so why in all that’s holy doesn’t it get on with it?
report thisPeter Hilton
Jul 26, 2010 at 11:48
There was never any possibilty that the PWC sponsored CarVal deal would do anything at all to allieviate the plight of the 24,000 UK pensioners who took out these "Secure Income Plans" etc. It was never about that - it was all about paying off the debt and unpaid fees to other parties which have accumulated during PWC's stewardship of the failed company. And of course benefitting CarVal's shareholders.
It has always been clear that the only way the victims would have any chance of seeing anything back (probably, in many cases, within their remaining lifetimes) would be if the FSCS scheme recognised that this whole thing (starting with names like "Secure Income Plan"and other marketing misrepresentaions and progressing through hidden $60M rakeoffs into Virgin Island "Trusts" was at best a regulatory cock-up of the first order and at worst a massive fraud perpetrated under the very noses of that same regulator.
So, as Harry has said - why is it so difficult for FSCS to make a decision?
report thisChris Stapleton
Jul 26, 2010 at 11:53
FSCS fannying about eh? they don't normally do that when they want to take more money from us!
report thisAndrew Cripps
Jul 26, 2010 at 16:09
It is now time that the FSCS should announce there decision on their 'IN DEPTH INVESTIGATION' and not September.
Some come on David and Nick, GET INVOLVED and help bring a swift end to this whole sorry debacle.
report thisleave a comment
Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.