New Model Adviser - For Professional Investors

Register to get unlimited access to Citywire’s fund manager database. Registration is free and only takes a minute.

Tory plan to restructure SFO criticised by lawyers

Tory plan to restructure SFO criticised by lawyers

The Conservatives manifesto plan to incorporate the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) into the National Crime Agency has been criticised by lawyers.

Yesterday in the Tory manifesto, the Party pledged to do more to stop financial crime. As part of this, the Tories said it will reshape the organisations who deal with this.

‘We will strengthen Britain’s response to white collar crime by incorporating the SFO into the National Crime Agency (NCA), improving intelligence sharing and bolstering the investigation of serious fraud, money laundering and financial crime,’ the manifesto said.

Founded in 1988 the SFO is charged with tackling the ‘top level’ of fraud and corruption and a ‘small number of large economic crime cases’. The organisation has been involved in tackling certain pension schemes over the years; however often bringing cases to prosecution is a lengthy process for the body.

Ben Rose, a partner at law firm Hickman & Rose, said moving the SFO under the NCA umbrella is a big risk.

‘It is difficult to see the rationale for moving the SFO under the umbrella of the NCA when the next government will have a very long list of institutions to reorganise,’ Rose said.

‘Given its specialist role there are scant savings to be made, and much to lose.  It would be preferable to use the time, energy and money in ensuring the SFO can do the job for which it was created.’

Omar Qureshi, head of corporate crime at law firm CMS, questioned the reasoning behind the move, calling it a ‘backward step in the fight against complex economic crime’.

‘Law enforcement needs more specialist resources and support to fight white collar crime, not less,’ he said.

‘In recent years the SFO has demonstrated its potential to achieve successful outcomes cost effectively. It is not at all clear why the government would want to curtail law enforcement’s ability to tackle economic crime in this way. The policy sends out a negative message on the government’s commitment to tackling fraud and corruption.’

 

 

 

Leave a comment!

Please sign in or register to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.
Comment & analysis
Investment

What does Mifid II mean for adviser outsourcing?

What does Mifid II mean for adviser outsourcing?

Adviser outsourcing soared ahead of the RDR, but the looming MiFID II directive lends fresh urgency to the question of whether advisers or outsourcing partners are responsible for suitability

Twitter