Other Citywire websites
Stay connected:

View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/new-model-adviser/article/a635381

Property groups warn Ucis clampdown could hit investment

by Daniel Grote on Nov 19, 2012 at 07:57

Property groups warn Ucis clampdown could hit investment

Property companies have raised fears the Financial Services Authority’s clampdown on unregulated collective investment schemes (Ucis) could hurt investment in property stocks, according to The Times.

Property groups Hammerson and Land Securities, which are both structured as real estate investment trusts (Reits), have warned the FSA’s plans could hurt investment into the vehicles.

The FSA is consulting on plans to ban the promotion of Ucis and similar products to ordinary retail investments, and property groups have voiced concerns they will be caught by the clampdown.

A spokesman for the FSA told The Times: ‘Some Reits may be included depending on their legal structure and if they are set up as a special purpose vehicle which is designed for investment purposes. But this is a consultation and this is not a foregone conclusion.’

Hammerson chief financial officer Timon Drakesmith told the paper: ‘Reits are arguably the safest form of securitised real estate as they are mandated to distribute dividends and there is a high degree of scrutiny and oversight. It is perfect for the retail investor and much safer than other types of investable stocks that are apparently fine.’

A spokesman for Land Securities added: ‘The worry about this is that it would almost seem to defeat the purpose why Reits were introduced in the first place, which was to make property investment more attractive to everyone.’

2 comments so far. Why not have your say?

Hickky

Nov 19, 2012 at 11:15

Methinks these property companies moan too loudly. By all means let stockbrokers advise on and recommend these REITs, but do they have a place within the type of investment recommended by an IFA?

We are not permitted to recommend individual stock, and these REITs are not a pooled investment per se, but a company that has converted to a REIT for its own and investor tax benefits.

If the clampdown means little new money coming in, then presumably the companies can convert back to the quoted share they used to be, although they then will have to pay the exchequer more in taxes. Result!

If they are so weak as businesses they cannot compete without this tax advantaged structure, tough!

report this

John Frink

Nov 19, 2012 at 13:24

Hmm, a REIT isn't a UCIS and most of them are PLC's anyway - how would a ban on UCIS (or even a ban on collectives...) effect dealings in shares?

report this

leave a comment

Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.

News sponsored by:

Opportunities emerge as production moves back home


As the UK coalition government strives to rebalance the national economy, so called 'reshoring' looks set to play an increasingly important role in economic recovery.

Today's top headlines

A spotlight on Alastair Mundy


Alastair Mundy met Citywire's Daniel Grote at the London Stock Exchange Studios for a detailed interview about the Investec Cautious Managed fund.

More about this article:

Look up the shares

  • Hammerson PLC (HMSO.L)
    Register or Sign in to receive email alerts for items in your favourites whenever we write about them
  • Land Securities Group PLC (LAND.L)
    Register or Sign in to receive email alerts for items in your favourites whenever we write about them

What others are saying

Archive


Sorry, this link is not
quite ready yet