Other Citywire websites
Stay connected:

View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/new-model-adviser/article/a705089

Provider payments scrutiny better late than never

by Daniel Grote on Sep 24, 2013 at 15:27

Provider payments scrutiny better late than never

In his two years with the regulator, Nick Poyntz-Wright can already lay claim to an impressive body of work. Annuity pricing and the management of unit-linked funds have come under scrutiny during the ex-Skandia boss’s time at the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), latterly in the role of long-term savings and pensions supervision director.

Last week we saw the results of his focus on provider payments to advisers, with a review of 80 deals showing more than half contravened the objectives of the retail distribution review (RDR).

It could be argued that these three issues are areas the FCA should have focused on a long time ago. As for its crackdown on provider payments, one obvious response, and one that was voiced on our blogs, is: why now?

That is one way of looking at it. The FCA has pointed to an upsurge in such deals, such as where providers funded adviser support services, in the run-up to the RDR as its call to action.

And it is only with the policy weight of the RDR behind it that the FCA has been fully equipped to tackle it. With the RDR’s objective of eliminating provider bias, the regulator is now emboldened to remove it wherever it occurs.

Just because the FCA has started to tackle the issue a little later than some would have wanted does not mean it is not doing the right thing.

1 comment so far. Why not have your say?

Ian Lees

Sep 25, 2013 at 08:23

What I fail to understand . . .and I am not alone . . . is Why these were allowed in the first place ? What is the difference between . . . unethical business ( e.g bungs backhanders and payments of any description ) and fraud ? these are corrupt payments - and the on going failure of a Regulator - who claims " they were not equipped to tackle it ", is irrelevant. The soldiers who went to war on Iraq under instruction of Tony Blair ( and the Labour Party ) - were " not equipped ", but got on with the job - and dealt with it as per instructions. Perhaps David Cameron should arm the FCA ?

report this

leave a comment

Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.

News sponsored by:

@investecam_uk

Latest Blogs


More about this article:

Archive


Read more...

FCA bans two advisers over unsuitable Sipp advice

by Michelle Abrego on Apr 17, 2014 at 10:24

Sorry, this link is not
quite ready yet