Other Citywire websites
Stay connected:

View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/new-model-adviser/article/a638154

Providers tell MPs to lift Nest restrictions….but not until 2017

by William Robins on Nov 28, 2012 at 14:18

Providers tell MPs to lift Nest restrictions….but not until 2017

Pension providers have told MPs to lift restrictions on the National Employment Savings Trust (Nest) after it has cleared financial and administrative hurdles.

Giving evidence to the Work and Pensions Select Committee providers Fidelity, Partnership, Scottish Life, and Phoenix Group said there was justification for removing the restrictions on Nest- there is currently a ban on transfers and a contribution cap-  under certain circumstances.

Ronnie Morgan, strategic insight manager at Scottish Life, told MPs: ‘Nest was set-up because of a supply side failure. Because of that the Nest restrictions should stay on until 2017. We couldn’t supply a solution to everyone. It would take a lot of skilled people away from the government’s policy. Getting employers enrolled.

‘Only [in 2017] will Nest have a track record. Until we have explored this market we should leave them on. It is really expensive and time consuming getting people on board a pension scheme. Nest will certainly have a significant problem getting these people on board [as] it’s a massive challenge already.’

Richard Parkin, head of proposition, defined contribution and workplace savings, Fidelity, said if the government implemented plans for automatic transfers of small pension pots it would have to remove the Nest transfer ban, but only for automatic transfers.

Partnership chief executive Steve Groves added: ‘The industry has not been very good at serving customers will small and average pots. The restrictions were put in there because of government subsidy and that’s a fair thing for the industry to have. We should give Nest time to build then I would remove the restrictions but I would make sure Nest is self-financing by the time they are removed.’

1 comment so far. Why not have your say?

Paul Barnard

Nov 28, 2012 at 15:09

Client "Should I transfer my highly charged with profits pension to a stakeholder Mr Adviser?"

Adviser "Can you come back in 2017 because you might be able to transfer it, free of charge of course, to a super new NEST plan. If I transfer it for you now, you mught sue me for bad advice in 5 years"

Client "Seems like an odd way to encourage people to save for retirement"

Adviser "You don't know the half of it. Try The MAS, they do everything free of charge and have been set up using "free" money too"

report this

leave a comment

Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.

News sponsored by:

Opportunities emerge as production moves back home

As the UK coalition government strives to rebalance the national economy, so called 'reshoring' looks set to play an increasingly important role in economic recovery.

Today's top headlines

A spotlight on Alastair Mundy

Alastair Mundy met Citywire's Daniel Grote at the London Stock Exchange Studios for a detailed interview about the Investec Cautious Managed fund.


Adviser Workshop: How to implement a fixed-fee model

by Jun Merrett on Jul 22, 2014 at 14:38

Sorry, this link is not
quite ready yet