Citywire printed articles sponsored by:
View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/new-model-adviser/article/a604369
Regulator freezes assets of suspected land banking firm
by Michelle Abrego on Jul 13, 2012 at 14:51
The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has frozen the assets of suspected land banking firm, Asset L.I. which also traded as Equity Services (London), and Asset Land Investment.
The FSA said that following a court order made on 13 July 2013, it was able to secure asset freezing orders on the firm as well as three individuals that cannot be named for legal reasons.
The FSA suspected that Asset L.I had been running the land banking operation, an activity it believes amounts to an unauthorised collective investment scheme.
The freezing order was achieved with the West Berkshire Trading Standards and the Metropolitan and Essex police forces, which have arrested one individual involved.
The FSA has also obtained court orders to prevent any of the companies or individuals from selling plots of land on particular sites, as there are pending investigations by the regulator and other agencies. There are also ongoing civil proceedings, it said.
The firms are believed to have promoted and sold plots of land in Stansted, Harrogate, Lutterworth, Newbury, Liphook, and South Godstone.
Tracey McDermott, FSA acting director of enforcement and financial crime, said: ’This is a further example of the FSA working with other agencies and taking action to protect consumers from unauthorised land banking firms and the individuals behind them.
‘Anybody investing in land should always have it independently valued to check its worth. Further, if you are ever sold land as an investment, and on the basis that someone else will manage it for you as part of a wider site, you should check that the firm is authorised by the FSA.’
The FSA does not regulate the sale of land, but land banking often amounts to collective investment, which requires FSA authorisation.
In March 2012, the regulator won a £32 million High Court battle against three land banks.
Markets
News sponsored by:
Today's top headlines
More about this article:
More from us
- FSA publishes legal basis for £100m Cru redress scheme
- FSA: Ucis rules have been ignored or misapplied
- MPs claim FSA support for Arch Cru settlement
- won a £32 million







5 comments so far. Why not have your say?
PensionMan
Jul 13, 2012 at 15:31
Here we go again!
report thisCirrusPilot
Jul 13, 2012 at 15:49
It amazes me the amount of money these bent sods take off people, If I could have a 10th of it legally, I would a very rich adviser.
As it is I do not use verbal strong arm tactics nor do I badger and pester clients as these firms have done.
I had 2 firms chase me for weeks, getting ever more insistent that I should give them my money. Only when I had told them that all their documentation they had sent me has been sent to the FSA, did they swear at me then left me alone
report thisMichael Middleton
Jul 13, 2012 at 18:12
Clearly this is good news, but Citywire you really must improve the clarity of your articles. Per se land banking is legitimate, after all how would the likes of Berkeley Homes survive, it is the "bent" selling of a scheme or bent scheme which is at issue
report thisArthur Schopenhauer
Jul 14, 2012 at 12:11
If we delete the word "should " from these articles and comments then we might have less sanctimonious pointless comment
report thisKeith Cobby
Jul 14, 2012 at 18:32
Will the FSA let me have a copy of the list of investors.
I am growing some lovely tulips!
report thisleave a comment
Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.