Citywire printed articles sponsored by:
View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/new-model-adviser/article/a394618
SFO investigates Keydata and Lifemark
by Iain Martin on Apr 16, 2010 at 16:21
The Serious Fraud Office has opened an investigation into Keydata and Lifemark.
The SFO said it was focusing its investigation on the activities, control and ownership of Luxembourg-based life settlement vehicle Lifemark. It has also begun to probe Keydata’s role in marketing and selling products underpinned by Lifemark.
Keydata was run by Stewart Ford, the founder of Keydata Investment Services and Lifemark (pictured). The FSA has investigated Ford over his management of Keydata, which was pushed into administration in June 2009.
The SFO has also traced a sizeable proportion of the £103 million misappropriated from around 5,000 investors who bought Keydata Secure Income Bonds. ‘The SFO has not traced the ultimate destination of all SLS funds but a sizeable proportion of funds has been traced,’ it said.
The SFO confirmed that controversial businessman David Elias was involved in the liquidation of assets from SLS Capital, the life settlement vehicle which backed Keydata Secure Income Bonds.
‘Assets were subsequently liquidated and funds were misappropriated in order to meet other business needs of David Elias, the then ultimate beneficial owner of SLS, and thus to the detriment of Keydata and other investors,’ stated the SFO.
Overseas investors who also put money into SLS Capital believe they have traced the missing money to Elias’ last business venture, which was a carbon credit trading scheme based in Brazil. Elias, who lived in Malaysian tax haven Labuan for the last years of his life was believe to have died on 8 May.
The SFO also identified a series of flaws with the business model of SLS Capital, which included not taking out hedging against the currecny risk posed by US dollar denominated life policies.
Markets
News sponsored by:
Today's top headlines
More about this article:
More from us
- SFO investigates Keydata and Lifemark
- FSCS faces legal challenge from Keydata victims
- Levy fears as FSCS revisits rejected Keydata claims
- Compensation fund revisits rejected Keydata claims
- FSCS: Why IFAs should pay for Keydata
- FSCS defies common sense on Keydata
- FSCS confirms £80 million interim levy for IFAs
- Why is FSCS blocking Keydata compensation now?
- Lifemark talks could leave FSCS liable for £350m
- FSCS reported to be rejecting Keydata non-ISA customers
- FSCS: Keydata could not have foreseen SLS fraud
- After Cru and Keydata, IMA chairman Ferrans urges vigilance
- Keydata: £12.3m of Lifemark bonds in default
- Keydata investors in disarray after tip off over £3m in worthless assets
- How to avoid being burned by traded life policies
- Keydata: Lifemark administration extended by six months
- Keydata victims still up a gum tree
- Keydata: rainforest link to missing millions
- FSA slams Keydata's Ford in court battle
- Keydata: SFO working with Luxembourg regulator to trace missing £103m
- FSCS: Keydata could hit advisers with £50m levy
- Ford launches new bid to regain parts of Keydata
- PwC questions recovery of Keydata's £2m Hometrak investment
- Pressure grows to put Keydata in default
- FSCS promises answers in September for Keydata investors
- Keydata missing millons: prospect of recovering assets 'poor'
- Keydata: Brunei insurer starts legal action to find money in SLS
- Keydata founder lent millions to David Elias
- Keydata founder fails to block FSA probe
- Fraud office sanctions probe into Keydata missing millions and SLS Capital
- Keydata: Fortis was custodian of missing millions
- Keydata directors deny links to David Elias
- David Elias: the man behind missing Keydata money
- Keydata administrator: '£103 million has gone', SFO called in
- Keydata collapsed after months of FSA scrutiny
- Serious questions for FSA over handling of Keydata
- Keydata director's salary increased eight fold in three years
- FSA forced Keydata into administration over contingency fund for tax dispute





2 comments so far. Why not have your say?
Harry Katz
Apr 16, 2010 at 16:53
So why is the FSCS dicking about? Why aren't the poor old clients given some comfort and told exactly how much has been recovered and that at least they can expect £x (or x% of their original investment) to be repaid. Or does it all have to go to PWC to meet their charges?
Perhaps enough can be recovered to reimburse (even in part) the poor old IFAs who have stumped up to compensate the ISA clients.
report thisleslie lawrence
Apr 16, 2010 at 17:55
harry the fscs could not care less about the clients their letter to us implicated that they were rather fond of Keydata & it was not Keydatas fault so no hope for the investor who put their trust in the FSA
report thisleave a comment
Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.