Other Citywire websites

Citywire printed articles sponsored by:


View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/new-model-adviser/article/a513081

Skandia hits out at FSA over cash rebate ban delay

by Alex Steger on Aug 02, 2011 at 14:26

Skandia hits out at FSA over cash rebate ban delay

Skandia has criticised the Financial Services Authority’s (FSA) decision to delay the implementation of the cash rebate ban, and claimed the delay creates uncertainty for platform operators.

The platform policy paper, which was published yesterday, confirmed the FSA’s intention to ban cash rebates and fund manager payments to platforms in principal, but it delayed their implementation until after the retail distribution review (RDR) deadline of 31 December 2012.

Skandia said: ‘Whilst the deadline for implementing the final platform rules remains unclear, the policy statement suggests that the platform consultation and RDR implementation date have been de-coupled. This is less than ideal for platform operators who are already building RDR-ready platform services and will have to continue these developments with uncertainty around what the final platform rules will be.’

Skandia was the only major platform to back the FSA’s decision to ban cash rebates when it was announced in November 2010.

Skandia also said it understood the FSA’s decision to ban fund manager payments to platforms despite being one of three fund supermarkets, along with Cofunds and FundsNetwork, which get paid via this business model.

The Old Mutual-owned platform provider said it was building an unbundled charging structure and so could survive under the FSA’s proposals.

It said: ‘The FSA’s desire to ban provider payments to platforms causes no issues for Skandia and it can understand the thought process and rationale behind it.  As part of the Retail Distribution Review and in line with adviser charging, the platform market has an opportunity to deliver transparent and understandable charging structures to investors. 

‘Skandia believes this will best be delivered by fully unbundled charging structures that separate the costs for fund management, platform and financial advice.’

‘Skandia is already well down the road in developing a new charging structure that will pass rebates in full back to customers, facilitate transparent adviser charging and be ready well ahead of the proposed RDR implementation date. 

‘This preparatory work gives Skandia the confidence that it can accommodate unit rebates if necessary, whereas other platforms only have one operating model, either based on a bundled charging structure or cash rebates, and will have to invest heavily to be able to accommodate unit rebates, thus potentially limiting further innovation.’

Sign in / register to view full article on one page

4 comments so far. Why not have your say?

Bert Poppins

Aug 02, 2011 at 15:30

But can they deliver it at a competitive price? It wasn't long ago that someone from Skandia stated that it would be impossible for them to deliver sub 50 bps which from where the market is heading looks rich.

report this

Stanley Kirk

Aug 02, 2011 at 18:21

Uniquely, Skandia operates both life company and platform businesses so closely linked that it is hard to see where one ends and the other begins. It started as a life company and that is still the largest part. None of the FSA platform proposals apply to life companies operating their fund choice through mirror funds (a Skandia speciality). Skandia therefore has an easy opt out if it wants to continue much the same 'high but hidden charge' model as it has done in the past unless the FSA wake up and look at life companies as well.

report this

Martinifa

Aug 03, 2011 at 11:17

Allow re-registration off your platform and life business Skandia!!!!!

I have clients stuck due to CGT that you are holding, non TCF !!!!

report this

John Stirling

Aug 03, 2011 at 17:46

I don't understand the difference between unit and cash rebates, provided both are transparent and recognised in the transaction statements both should be ok. If they are under the table then that is different, and the FSA appear to have finally recognised that. If it's a unit rebate then presumably you simply sell those units as they arrive - an additional transaction which may be chargeable - if you want the cash rather than the units - or will they be banning customers from liquidating those units?

Which means it is needless complication for the sake of complication. Provided the platform has the technology to recognise unit rebates it has no impact whatsoever, and if the platform doesn't have that capability then the FSA is promoting additional cost, and IT spend for no additional client benefit or clarity.

The purported reason for 'no cash rebates to client account' was because dodgy advisers (or platforms) could say 'look we're cheap/free because the rebate pays for us'. Well I suppose that units will work identically except dodgy advisers and platforms have to say 'look we're cheap/free because the rebate of units pays for us'.

How much is this process costing?

report this

leave a comment

Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.

Sorry, this link is not
quite ready yet