Towry takes on ex-RBS adviser for Nottingham office

And this is felt worthy news because ?????

1 Towry advertise with us a lot and we like mentioning them

2 it a quiet news day

Or

3 we couldn't be bothered in reporting proper news?

"a highly regarded professional firm" -

hahahahahahahahahahahaha

I am so please that she has been blinded by semantics, I will give her 12 months and then she may realize that pushing clients all across to TL s own funds is not only not impartial but is designed to create a big chunk of AUM to sell when Mr Fisher decides he is ready to retire, great when you can get it, but not for the clients.

I agree, I'm not sure why this makes the news. Makes me think twice about opening other links now!

I'm impressed to read that she's "level four qualified", unlike...Oh, hang on.

hahaha

And this is news because.......?

Of course completely unrelated to this story but it is a shame there is no 'rate this comment' (i.e. agree or disgaree) facility on Citywire like there is on the BBC News site. It would reduce the amount of comments to read for some stories as well as garner opinions as to how others feel (i.e. 35 people like this comment/5 people don't etc). Food for thought maybe.....

The BBC doesn't have to keep advertisers happy Julian.

Has anyone ever seen Towry adviertise on Citywire..... or anywhere else for that matter?

Why advertise when they get all this free publicity. They must be name-checked every day on Citywire.

What a miserble bunch you all are.

Good luck to her I say! :)

Zoomer

She will need all the luck she can get, and believe me, after a couple of weeks she will be miserable too.

Aye but maybe you should let her find that out for herself!

To: Step hen (fee based IFA).

I have seen Towry Law advertise, sadly, only when it is paid for by someone else!

The point I was making is that Citywire is a "free" subscription entity. They therefore need to quantify the amount of readers to give there advertisers people to sell to. The BBC is not reliant on revenue from advertisers and can therefore afford to ask readers to rate posts, Citywire cannot as it may affect advertising revenues. My previous comment was not particularly relating to the article, but more a previous post.

And the latest sucker joins Towry Law, to only be dismissed in 12 months time after all her clients have been transferred onto their overcharged tied portfolio.

@ Ivan Lyons - what clients will she have - she was a bank adviser and if she has taken their details with her, she will be in breach of Data Protection Laws. I don't know many bank advisers that give their customers their private mobile number,...

However, "impartial advice" it aint, nor independent, nor cheap, nor well performing and not that low on volatility either,...

Anyway, good luck Victoria!

Nottingham Andrew you may find the quality of wealth managers well established in that area

Adam Grant.

I think you may be being a little naive.

Firstly, there is no breach of data protection laws. Giving your clients your personal mobile is perfectly acceptable to "go the extra mile" in service. I know many that give their personal number.

If anything she's more likely to be in breach of the restrictive covenant in her contract not to contact clients within 6 months of leaving RBS.

However, let's not forget that RBS has little to no systems in place to actually ascertain suddenly losing a load of bancassurance business since their model is entirely based on a single sale with no ongoing relationship.

As far as I was aware the standard model for being an IFA was to go to a bank, get qualified, run off with a client bank and do the job properly. Or has that changed?

Citywire, I took on a new paraplanner last week. Would you like a photo so you can get the scoop on this headliner?