Other Citywire websites

Citywire printed articles sponsored by:


View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/new-model-adviser/article/a392558

Why expats are crying out for New Model Advisers

by Carl Melvin on Apr 08, 2010 at 12:00

Why expats are crying out for New Model Advisers

The arrival of wraps allows fee-based financial planners in the UK to offer a sound, client-focused service to expats, who up until recently have been easy prey to unscrupulous offshore IFAs, writes Carl Melvin of Affluent Financial Planning.

Life can be tough for expatriates using the services of offshore independent financial advisers. These are advisers based outside the UK and not subject to the strict compliance and professional standards imposed on IFAs by UK financial services rules.

I worked briefly for an offshore firm in the early 1990s, but I lasted less than six months. I left disgusted at the practises and behaviour of the firm and its ‘advisers’.

The alarm bells started to ring when I discovered that my employer did not have a work permit for me, only a tourist visa. As with the other advisers, I was expected to leave the country every six months and fly to Kuala Lumpur for a few days before flying back to resume my position. The sales practises employed by the company were truly shocking.

Unfortunately, 20 years later, little has changed in the way many offshore IFAs work or the protection afforded to expatriate investors.

Poor-quality plans

The offshore environment offers unethical ‘advisers’ a home where they can avoid regulation designed to protect investors and ensure professional behaviour.

The offshore IFA is assisted by the offshore insurance company. Many are the international divisions of well-known UK insurance companies, which trade on their brand awareness and trust with the public. All too often, the providers create poor-quality offshore plans that help the offshore IFA sell the scam to the expat investor.

Such plans exhibit the following features:

  • Complex charging structures – with multiple charges such as establishment fees, percentage or flat administration fees and policy charges.
  • Restrictive terms/lack of flexibility – the providers use obfuscation to hide the lack of flexibility, even though the offshore IFA sells the plan on the basis of flexibility. Enhanced allocation, establishment
    periods, surrender penalties for early termination or even reducing the level of contribution are commonplace. Such contracts are wholly unsuitable for expatriate clients.
  • High charges – the total costs for such plans are huge but because they are layered between multiple charge types, such as those above, the investor does not fully understand how expensive the plan is.

In short, these plans are designed to make the product provider and the offshore IFA money, rather than serve the client. Their purpose is to hide big commissions for the salesperson and the massive penalties should the client stop the plan early.

One ploy that continues is the ‘extended term’ swindle. Here, the salesman sets up the offshore ‘regular savings plan’ with a term of, say, 20 years
or more, even though the expat investor may only have a work contract for three to five years in the country in question.

So why not set the plan term to three or five years? Because the longer the term, the bigger
the commission. Unfortunately, if the client stops the plan or reduces the contribution level, there are often very severe penalties or administration costs. It is not uncommon for the first two or three years’ contributions to be taken in charges, leaving the investor with nothing after saving for years – outrageous!

No redress

But then, how are you going to obtain redress? The provider will say the advice was given by the adviser firm, who in turn will blame the individual adviser who happens to have left the company or country. Nor is there any effective ombudsman service to enable the client to be compensated.

The offshore IFA sector demonstrates the following qualities:

  • Lack of professional standards regarding commission disclosure and treating customers fairly rules.
  • Low levels of professional qualification.
  • A sales-led approach rather than a client-centric, service-based approach.
  • Dubious integrity and honesty.

Expats often have high tax-free salaries but no UK pension scheme benefits, so there is a real need for them to engage in financial planning and invest for the future. They are vulnerable to offshore IFAs, many of whom do not behave ethically.

There is a real need for the New Model Adviser® to engage with the expat community. Such clients would benefit from the higher professional standards, transparency and lack of commission bias that is provided by a fee-only approach.

Technology now makes it possible for UK financial planners to service expat clients wherever they may be. Email and web conferencing have dissolved the barriers to service that existed before.

The emergence of wrap platforms will be the final nail in the coffin of the offshore products pedalled by offshore IFAs. Wraps offer a simple, transparent, flexible and comprehensive wealth management service for expat investors.

Offshore salesmen move aside – the new model expat adviser has arrived!

Carl Melvin (CFP) is managing director of Affluent Financial Planning

7 comments so far. Why not have your say?

Mary Dunn

Apr 08, 2010 at 15:12

Thank you Carl - I hadn't really thought about offshore IFA's in that way before.

Had I read this article a year ago I might well have fought harder to keep a client who recently decided to return to his original adviser in order to avoid my fees.

It just so happens that the adviser is an off-shore IFA based in Saudi who sold some 'wonderful pension plans' (reg saving offshore Inv Bond) over, you guessed it, a 20 yr term when from memory, a 10 - 12 yr term would have been ample

When I tried to unlock the plans I found the client was rigidly tied in and that servicing commissions were locked into the adviser for the term , thus rendering them useless in offsetting our fees.

Very sad.

report this

David Trenner - Intelligent Pensions

Apr 08, 2010 at 15:46

Big chunks of money are going to QROPS through offshore advisers.

We have seen correspondence to one of our clients, which amongst other things ignores the tax exempt nature of UK pension funds, implying that an offshore bond is more tax efficient.

The "advisers" email concludes with a classic 'buy now before the loophole is closed' pitch:

"The window of opportunity with HMRC may close in the future, so time may be of

the essence."

Incidentally, since Gaines-Cooper, when is an ex-pat not an ex-pat?!!

David

report this

Mark Fletcher

Apr 08, 2010 at 17:06

I went to a conference in the Isle of Man a few years back where there were both UK and International advisers present.

I can endorse everything Carl says about the offshore fraternity, although some of those guys go into some pretty hairy places to get the business (Africa, Central Asia, Mid East).

I also came across a client who'd spent time out in Hong Kong and had been flogged a Clerical Medical With Profit Offshore Bond. However, this had the added benefit of being 100% geared!! Unfortunately the bonus rates in no way covered the interest payments as originally designed and the whopping surrender penalties and MVA meant that he was going to be stuck with it until the 10 yr anniversary. Sweet!!

report this

Rob Stevenson

Apr 09, 2010 at 11:59

I read this article in the paper this week (terribly old fashioned I know) and found myself nodding furiously.

I've undertaken a few research projects for IFA firm's looking to open up offshore advice centre's and it really is like the wild west - red braces, ferrari's, smile and dial salesmen, terrible products and innocent client's being taken to the cleaners.

Interestingly, any mention of UK based, FSA authorised firms coming onto their patch to do business, was met with derision from the offshore boys - "you wouldn't last 5 minutes out here".

One chap in Dubai who was prepared to talk openly explained that the FSA is viewed as the gold-standard and so any FSA authorised firm brave enough to get out there and do it properly, would clean up - literally.

Modern technology makes this possible, without the air miles. Just watch your regulatory passports and all that!

Great article.

report this

steve taw

Apr 12, 2010 at 02:44

Can anybody suggest a Provider willing to take money, Lump sum, pension, Regular, Insurance Premium-whatever, from a client living in Japan?

...except Friends Provident, Generali and Royal London

report this

Jeremy Psar

Jun 07, 2010 at 06:06

Carl Melvin, in his article, refers to wrap platforms in opposition to Life Assurances products.

Does anyone one know which wrap platforms allow you to accept business from international clients (non UK) no matter where they are residing?

As far as I know, Life assurance products are the only one flexible enough to be used in most countries around the world. Indeed, it is not the cheapest alternative and makes it difficult to work on a fee basis...

report this

Susan Barnes

Sep 07, 2011 at 16:31

Thanks for the above article. It reflects my experience as a client. I was sold a Generali Vision life insurance policy as a flexible and profitable retirement savings plan by an offshore adviser. He misrepresented the policy and gave a varying but reassuring-sounding account his own supposed background in financial services. He said what needed to be said to make the sale.

I posted a more detailed comment earlier, but it has been deleted.

report this

leave a comment

Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.

Sorry, this link is not
quite ready yet