Other Citywire websites

Citywire printed articles sponsored by:


View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/new-model-adviser/article/a413332

Williams went in too hard at Cofunds

by Michelle McGagh on Jul 09, 2010 at 11:58

Williams went in too hard at Cofunds

When New Model Adviser® spoke to Williams in February 2009 weeks after he took up his post at Cofunds he was already putting in place a strategic plan for the next three years.

His plan was to liberate advisers and their clients from ‘old-fashioned’ with-profits funds and life assurance bonds. Now, just two years on and Williams gone, maybe he should have looked at updating his ‘old-fashioned’ negotiating skills too.

It was one thing for Williams, who cut his teeth at Selestia, to use the might and scale of Skandia to bully fund managers into paying 90 out of 150 basis points to the industry’s original funds platform.

It was quite another to try the same at Cofunds where fund managers Legal & General, Threadneedle, Jupiter and Prudential are shareholders in the business

It can’t have been positive for board/ shareholder relations to have an over-confident Williams swagger into their offices and demand a bigger slice of the pie and it wouldn’t be surprising if mild-mannered Charlie Eppinger had been brought back as a friendly face to calm the situation.

Wraps may be the doorway through which the financial sales industry becomes an advice profession – but new model or not the power ultimately lies with shareholders who want growth and return on their investment not squabbles over basis points.

1 comment so far. Why not have your say?

Man in Black

Jul 10, 2010 at 09:18

Well, CoFunds is now in profit (finally). It's no longer selling extra chunks to the Life Companies....that is at least a positive.

The main problem I see for Cofunds now is that with these deals in place with the Fund groups, it's business-model (and moreover its margins) are highly vulnerable to regulatory interference e.g. unbundling and RDR.

Arguably, they went the 'wrong way' in terms of taking a greater cut of the AMC (which in turn is tending to restricting choice/availability).

These 'older' more established paltforms/supermarkets seem to capable of catching the Life Company Disease e.g. increasing amounts of bureaucracy, longer/slower decision making chains, and an inability to keep up with technology. New Entrants into the market do not have this baggage, are able to adopt the cutting edge technology etc and of course, are not run like the Civil Service...Somebody at Cofunds (and indeed Transact) needs to address this.

There's a related point. With smaller/new-entrant platforms, the IFA is understood as valuable customer. With the larger established players (and again I include Transact in this), no IFA (however large its FUM) seems anymore to be valued and treated with the flexibility and common-sense by which we treat our clients.

report this

leave a comment

Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.

Sorry, this link is not
quite ready yet