Twitter icon Email alerts icon Latest News RSS icon Magazine icon Stay connected:

View the article online at

All eyes on pay after Aberdeen forced to explain bonus system

by Eleanor Lawrie on Jan 29, 2014 at 15:05

All eyes on pay after Aberdeen forced to explain bonus system

Now Aberdeen Asset Management has been compelled to clarify its remuneration policy for departing employees, will other listed asset managers face shareholder pressure over executive pay?

Aberdeen responded to criticism of its remuneration policy ahead of its AGM earlier this month by stressing that incoming executive directors will not be entitled to a bonus after they have left the company, except in exceptional circumstances such as ill health.

A spokesperson said the company did not believe in rewarding failure, with executive bonus awards taking account of key financial performance indicators.

Shareholder activism on remuneration has not been commonplace, but since October of last year, shareholders have had a legally binding vote on directors’ remuneration in a listed company. This means more than half have to agree on a policy for it to be passed.

The changes were the brainchild of business secretary Vince Cable, who wants there to be a ‘clearer link between pay and performance’.

The new rules also force firms to reveal how much chief executives are paid as a single cumulative figure, rather than a potentially complex breakdown of their salary and various benefits. If they leave the company, their payoff must also be made public.

Aberdeen was one of the first companies to be affected, but other firms may also come under pressure to make changes so they do not appear to be ‘rewarding failure’.

Paul Hewitt, a business development manager at Manifest, a leading proxy voting and corporate governance support service, believes the fact that Aberdeen issued an update of this kind was significant because the firm was aware of how a less specific policy could look to shareholders.

‘It’s interesting that Aberdeen specifically referred to the fact that it won’t apply in the case of poor performance because they are cautious of what the public response to that kind of announcement could be,’ he said. ‘Investors are a little bit more focused now, and they are less willing to assume the best where there is doubt.’

Sign in / register to view full article on one page

leave a comment

Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.

News sponsored by:

Sponsored Video: Bringing it all back home

As the UK coalition government strives to rebalance the national economy, so called 'reshoring' looks set to play an increasingly important role in economic recovery.

Today's top headlines

Sponsored Video: Barings on investing in Frontier Markets

From Nigeria to Pakistan and from Kenya to Kuwait, frontier markets are catching investors' attention as never before.

More about this:

Look up the shares

  • Aberdeen Asset Management PLC (ADN.L)
    Register or Sign in to receive email alerts for items in your favourites whenever we write about them

Look up the fund managers

  • Peter Michaelis
    Register or Sign in to receive email alerts for items in your favourites whenever we write about them


On the road

Click here to find out more from the Audience Development team.

Sorry, this link is not
quite ready yet